Display options
Share it on

Matrix Biol Plus. 2021 May 14;10:100064. doi: 10.1016/j.mbplus.2021.100064. eCollection 2021 Jun.

A new mouse mutant with cleavage-resistant versican and isoform-specific versican mutants demonstrate that proteolysis at the Glu.

Matrix biology plus

Sumeda Nandadasa, Cyril Burin des Roziers, Christopher Koch, Karin Tran-Lundmark, María T Dours-Zimmermann, Dieter R Zimmermann, Sophie Valleix, Suneel S Apte

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering-ND20, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
  2. Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016 - CNRS UMR8104 - Paris Descartes University Medical School, 24, Rue du faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
  3. Department of Experimental Medical Science and Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  4. Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

PMID: 34195596 PMCID: PMC8233476 DOI: 10.1016/j.mbplus.2021.100064

Abstract

Two inherent challenges in the mechanistic interpretation of protease-deficient phenotypes are defining the specific substrate cleavages whose reduction generates the phenotypes and determining whether the phenotypes result from loss of substrate function, substrate accumulation, or loss of a function(s) embodied in the substrate fragments. Hence, recapitulation of a protease-deficient phenotype by a cleavage-resistant substrate would stringently validate the importance of a proteolytic event and clarify the underlying mechanisms. Versican is a large proteoglycan required for development of the circulatory system and proper limb development, and is cleaved by ADAMTS proteases at the Glu

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Keywords: ADAMTS; Extracellular matrix; Limb development; Metalloprotease; Proteoglycan; Syndactyly

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Cell Rep. 2015 Jun 16;11(10):1519-28 - PubMed
  2. Cell Res. 2005 Jul;15(7):483-94 - PubMed
  3. FASEB J. 2003 Jan;17(1):47-9 - PubMed
  4. Matrix Biol. 2017 Jul;60-61:38-56 - PubMed
  5. Dev Dyn. 2007 Jun;236(6):1683-93 - PubMed
  6. Cell. 1998 May 1;93(3):411-22 - PubMed
  7. Development. 2010 Dec;137(23):4029-38 - PubMed
  8. Dev Biol. 2011 Sep 1;357(1):152-64 - PubMed
  9. J Biol Chem. 1994 Dec 30;269(52):32992-8 - PubMed
  10. Biochem J. 2004 Feb 1;377(Pt 3):787-95 - PubMed
  11. Dev Biol. 1997 Jun 1;186(1):58-72 - PubMed
  12. Matrix Biol. 2021 Mar;97:40-57 - PubMed
  13. J Cell Biol. 1995 Jul;130(1):227-37 - PubMed
  14. Matrix Biol. 2018 Oct;71-72:225-239 - PubMed
  15. J Invest Dermatol. 2003 Jan;120(1):153-63 - PubMed
  16. Genesis. 2014 Jul;52(7):702-12 - PubMed
  17. Matrix Biol. 2014 Apr;35:34-41 - PubMed
  18. J Exp Med. 2020 Oct 5;217(10): - PubMed
  19. Matrix Biol. 2015 May-Jul;44-46:1-6 - PubMed
  20. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2043:173-178 - PubMed
  21. J Clin Invest. 2007 Jun;117(6):1627-36 - PubMed
  22. J Biol Chem. 2003 Oct 24;278(43):42330-9 - PubMed
  23. Cell Rep. 2018 Apr 10;23(2):485-498 - PubMed
  24. Matrix Biol. 2015 May-Jul;44-46:24-37 - PubMed
  25. Dev Biol. 1998 Oct 1;202(1):56-66 - PubMed
  26. J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 17;29(24):7731-42 - PubMed
  27. J Clin Invest. 2000 Oct;106(8):941-9 - PubMed
  28. Mol Pathol. 1999 Feb;52(1):11-8 - PubMed
  29. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2043:1-12 - PubMed
  30. J Biol Chem. 2011 Sep 30;286(39):34298-310 - PubMed
  31. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Dec;15(12):786-801 - PubMed
  32. J Biol Chem. 2001 Apr 20;276(16):13372-8 - PubMed
  33. PLoS Genet. 2008 Feb 29;4(2):e1000003 - PubMed
  34. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Aug;87(15):5888-92 - PubMed
  35. J Biol Chem. 2013 Jan 18;288(3):1907-17 - PubMed
  36. Dev Cell. 2009 Nov;17(5):687-98 - PubMed
  37. Development. 2003 Oct;130(19):4665-72 - PubMed
  38. Elife. 2020 Sep 10;9: - PubMed
  39. J Biol Chem. 2014 Oct 3;289(40):27859-73 - PubMed
  40. Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 27;10(1):953 - PubMed
  41. Dev Cell. 2008 Feb;14(2):298-311 - PubMed
  42. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012 Aug 31;425(3):497-502 - PubMed
  43. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009 May;41(5):1116-26 - PubMed
  44. Matrix Biol. 2020 May;87:77-93 - PubMed
  45. J Mol Endocrinol. 2005 Oct;35(2):343-55 - PubMed
  46. Dev Biol. 2006 Dec 15;300(2):699-709 - PubMed
  47. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 15;10(7):e0133056 - PubMed
  48. Circulation. 2004 Oct 5;110(14):1953-9 - PubMed
  49. J Biol Chem. 2003 Mar 14;278(11):9503-13 - PubMed
  50. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 May 1;102(5):1631-1641 - PubMed
  51. Dev Biol. 2005 Jan 1;277(1):255-69 - PubMed
  52. Dev Dyn. 2006 Aug;235(8):2238-47 - PubMed
  53. J Clin Invest. 1999 Feb;103(4):517-24 - PubMed
  54. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 11;10(1):4471 - PubMed

Publication Types