Display options
Share it on

Trials. 2021 Jul 05;22(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05375-6.

SENSory re-learning of the UPPer limb (SENSUPP) after stroke: development and description of a novel intervention using the TIDieR checklist.

Trials

Håkan Carlsson, Birgitta Rosén, Anders Björkman, Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen, Christina Brogårdh

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Rehabilitation Medicine, Memory Disorders and Geriatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. [email protected].
  2. Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. [email protected].
  3. Department of Translational Medicine - Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  4. Department of Hand Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  5. Department of Neurology, Rehabilitation Medicine, Memory Disorders and Geriatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  6. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  7. Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

PMID: 34225764 PMCID: PMC8259306 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05375-6

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sensorimotor impairments of upper limb (UL) are common after stroke, leading to difficulty to use the UL in daily life. Even though many have sensory impairments in the UL, specific sensory training is often lacking in stroke rehabilitation. Thus, the aim of this paper is to provide a detailed description of the novel intervention "SENSory re-learning of the UPPer limb after stroke (SENSUPP)" that we have developed to improve functioning in the UL in persons with mild to moderate impairments after stroke.

METHODS: The SENSUPP protocol was designed using information from literature reviews, clinical experience and through consultation of experts in the field. The protocol integrates learning principles based on current neurobiological knowledge and includes repetitive intensive practice, difficulty graded exercises, attentive exploration of a stimulus with focus on the sensory component, and task-specific training in meaningful activities that includes feedback. For reporting the SENSUPP protocol, the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist was used.

RESULTS: The essential features of the SENSUPP intervention comprise four components: applying learning principles based on current neurobiological knowledge, sensory re-learning (exercises for touch discrimination, proprioception and tactile object recognition), task-specific training in meaningful activities, and home-training. The training is performed twice a week, in 2.5-h sessions for 5 weeks.

CONCLUSION: Since there is close interaction between the sensory and motor systems, the SENSUPP intervention may be a promising method to improve UL functioning after stroke. The TIDieR checklist has been very useful for reporting the procedure and development of the training.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03336749 . Registered on 8 November 2017.

Keywords: Sensory training; Stroke; Task-specific training; Upper limb

References

  1. Stroke. 2005 Dec;36(12):2665-9 - PubMed
  2. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):200-17 - PubMed
  3. Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1116-1123 - PubMed
  4. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003 Sep;17(3):176-91 - PubMed
  5. Occup Ther Int. 2016 Dec;23(4):444-456 - PubMed
  6. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;56(3):241-4 - PubMed
  7. BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687 - PubMed
  8. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;508:397-410 - PubMed
  9. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):290-5 - PubMed
  10. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Aug;8(8):741-54 - PubMed
  11. Man Ther. 2016 Aug;24:85-9 - PubMed
  12. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 04;9(2):e87987 - PubMed
  13. Can J Occup Ther. 2014 Oct;81(4):215-225 - PubMed
  14. Clin Rehabil. 2016 Aug;30(8):731-40 - PubMed
  15. PM R. 2019 Aug;11(8):821-827 - PubMed
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD006331 - PubMed
  17. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(12):993-1000 - PubMed
  18. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):575-8 - PubMed
  19. Neural Plast. 2001;8(1-2):131-40 - PubMed
  20. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):339-46 - PubMed
  21. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 12;(11):CD010820 - PubMed
  22. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Nov;84(11):1692-702 - PubMed
  23. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 May;114(5):915-29 - PubMed
  24. Occup Ther Int. 2009;16(3-4):175-89 - PubMed
  25. Front Neurosci. 2019 Apr 30;13:402 - PubMed
  26. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011 Aug;69(4):624-9 - PubMed
  27. Neuropharmacology. 2000 Mar 3;39(5):733-42 - PubMed
  28. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;110:93-103 - PubMed
  29. Trials. 2018 Apr 17;19(1):229 - PubMed
  30. BMC Neurol. 2018 Jan 09;18(1):2 - PubMed
  31. J Rehabil Med. 2018 Jan 10;50(1):45-51 - PubMed
  32. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):12 - PubMed
  33. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Jan;23(1):27-39 - PubMed
  34. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Feb;43(3):257-63 - PubMed
  35. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 May;25(4):304-13 - PubMed
  36. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Apr;23(2):136-46 - PubMed
  37. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 May-Jun;21(3):263-72 - PubMed
  38. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Sep;30(8):731-42 - PubMed
  39. BMJ. 2013 Sep 10;347:f3755 - PubMed
  40. J Neurol. 2003 Jul;250(7):850-60 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types