Display options
Share it on

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Jul 07; doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-01026-7. Epub 2021 Jul 07.

Evaluation of the input site and characteristics of the antegrade fast pathway based on three-dimensional bi-atrial stimulus-ventricle mapping.

Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing

Kazuhisa Matsumoto, Takeshi Tobiume, Tomomi Matsuura, Takayuki Ise, Kenya Kusunose, Koji Yamaguchi, Shusuke Yagi, Daijyu Fukuda, Tetsuzo Wakatsuki, Hirotsugu Yamada, Takeshi Soeki, Masataka Sata

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 770-8501, Japan. [email protected].
  2. Department of Cardiology, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima City, Tokushima, 770-8501, Japan.

PMID: 34231099 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-021-01026-7

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous studies examined the right atrial (RA) input site of the antegrade fast pathway (AFp) (AFpI). However, the left atrial (LA) input to the atrioventricular (AV) node has not been extensively evaluated. In this study, we created three-dimensional (3-D) bi-atrial stimulus-ventricle (St-V) maps and analyzed the input site and characteristics of the AFp in both the RA and LA.

METHODS: Forty-four patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation or WPW syndrome were included in this study. Three-dimensional bi-atrial St-V mapping was performed using an electroanatomical mapping system. Sites exhibiting the minimal St-V interval (MinSt-V) were defined as AFpIs and were classified into seven segments, four in the RA (F, S, M, and I) and three in the LA (M1, M2, and M3). By combining the MinSt-V in the RA and LA, the AFpIs were classified into three types: RA, LA, and bi-atrial (BA) types. The clinical and electrophysiological characteristics were compared.

RESULTS: AFpIs were most frequently observed at site S in the RA (34%) and M2 in the LA (50%), and the BA type was the most common (57%). AFpIs in the LA were recognized in 75% of the patients. There were no clinical or electrophysiological indicators for predicting AFpI sites.

CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional bi-atrial St-V maps could classify AFpIs in both the RA and LA. AFpIs in the LA were frequently recognized. There were no significant clinical or electrophysiological indicators for predicting AFpI sites, and 3-D bi-atrial St-V mapping was the only method to reveal the precise AFp input site.

Keywords: Antegrade fast pathway; Left atrial input; Right atrial input; St-H map; St-V map

References

  1. Delise P, Bonso A, Coro L, Fantinel M, Gasparini G, Themistoclakis S, Mantovan R. Pacemapping of the triangle of Koch: a simple method to reduce the risk of atrioventricular block during radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001;24:1725–31. - PubMed
  2. Delise P, Sitta N, Bonso A, Coro’ L, Fantinel M, Mantovan R, Sciarra L, Zoppo F, Verlato R, Marras E, D’Este D. Pace mapping of Koch’s triangle reduces risk of atrioventricular block during ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16:30–5. - PubMed
  3. Tanaka Y, Yamabe H, Morihisa K, Uemura T, Kawano H, Nagayoshi Y, Kojima S, Ogawa H. Incidence and mechanism of dislocated fast pathway in various forms of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circ J. 2007;71:1099–106. - PubMed
  4. Tanaka S, Yoshida A, Fukuzawa K, Takei A, Kanda G, Takami K, Kumagai H, Takami M, Itoh M, Imamura K, Fujiwara R, Hirata K. Recognition of inferiorly dislocated fast pathways guided by three-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011;32:95–103. - PubMed
  5. Suzuki A, Yoshida A, Takei A, Fukuzawa K, Kiuchi K, Tanaka S, Itoh M, Imamura K, Fujiwara R, Nakanishi T, Yamashita S, Matsumoto A, Konishi H, Ichibori H, Hirata K. Visualization of the antegrade fast and slow pathway inputs in patients with slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37(7):874–83. - PubMed
  6. Gonzalez MD, Contreras LJ, Cardona F, Klugewicz CJ, Conti JB, Curtis AB, Morey TE, Dennis DM. Demonstration of a left atrial input to the atrioventricular node in humans. Circulation. 2002;106:2930–4. - PubMed
  7. Reddy CP, Damato AN, Akhtar M, Ogunkelu JB, Caracta AR, Ruskin JN, Lau SH. Time dependent changes in the functional properties of the atrioventricular conduction system in man. Circulation. 1975;52(6):1012–22. - PubMed
  8. Akhtar M, Damato AN, Batsford WP, Ruskin JN, Ogunkelu JB. A comparative analysis of antegrade and retrograde conduction patterns in man. Circulation. 1975;52(5):766–78. - PubMed
  9. Denker S, Lehmann M, Mahmud R, Gilbert C, Akhtar M. Effects of alternating cycle lengths on refractoriness of the His-Purkinje system. J Clin Invest. 1984;74(2):559–70. - PubMed
  10. Chilson DA, Zipes DP, Heger JJ, Browne KF, Prystowsky EN. Functional bundle branch block: discordant response of right and left bundle branches to changes in heart rate. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54(3):313–6. - PubMed
  11. Liu J, Dole LR. Late complete atrioventricular block complicating radiofrequency catheter ablation of a left posteroseptal accessory pathway. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21(11 Pt 1):2136–8. - PubMed
  12. Seidl K, Hauer B, Zahn R, Senges J. Unexpected complete AV block following transcatheter ablation of a left posteroseptal accessory pathway. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21(11 Pt 1):2139–42. - PubMed
  13. Kobza R, Hindricks G, Tanner H, Kottkamp H. Left-septal ablation of the fast pathway in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia refractory to right septal ablation. Europace. 2005;7(2):149–53. - PubMed
  14. Mitrani RD, Klein LS, Hackett FK, Zipes DP, Miles WM. Radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia: comparison between fast (anterior) and slow (posterior) pathway ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21(2):432–41. - PubMed

Publication Types