Display options
Cite
Gedefaw G, Wondmieneh A, Getie A, et al. Estimating the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Fistula in Ethiopia: Results from Demographic and Health Survey. Int J Womens Health. 2021;13:683-690doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S306221.
Gedefaw, G., Wondmieneh, A., Getie, A., Bimerew, M., & Demis, A. (2021). Estimating the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Fistula in Ethiopia: Results from Demographic and Health Survey. International journal of women's health, 13683-690. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S306221
Gedefaw, Getnet, et al. "Estimating the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Fistula in Ethiopia: Results from Demographic and Health Survey." International journal of women's health vol. 13 (2021): 683-690. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S306221
Gedefaw G, Wondmieneh A, Getie A, Bimerew M, Demis A. Estimating the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Fistula in Ethiopia: Results from Demographic and Health Survey. Int J Womens Health. 2021 Jul 07;13:683-690. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S306221. eCollection 2021. PMID: 34262358; PMCID: PMC8273908.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Int J Womens Health. 2021 Jul 07;13:683-690. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S306221. eCollection 2021.

Estimating the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Fistula in Ethiopia: Results from Demographic and Health Survey.

International journal of women's health

Getnet Gedefaw, Adam Wondmieneh, Addisu Getie, Melaku Bimerew, Asmamaw Demis

Affiliations

  1. School of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
  2. School of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.

PMID: 34262358 PMCID: PMC8273908 DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S306221

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Obstetric fistula is the most common obstetric problem in low- and middle-income countries where maternal care is inaccessible. Obstetric fistula has serious social and economic consequences resulting in devastating health problems for women. There is a lack of national studies that show the burden of obstetric fistula and risk factors; as a result, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence of obstetric fistula, its symptoms, and risk factors in Ethiopia.

METHODS: A population-level cross-sectional study was conducted with a total of 7590 women who gave birth in the last 5 years, using data from the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. Complex sample analysis and normalized weighting were used to compensate for the disproportionate sampling in the survey. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to find a significant association between obstetric fistula and covariates. Both odds ratios (crude and adjusted) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.

RESULTS: Among the 7590 women having given birth in the last 5 years, 32 (0.42%) women with obstetric fistula were identified. Of these, 64% developed obstetric fistula after live birth and 23.1% developed obstetric fistula after stillbirth. More than 72.8% were associated with prolonged and very difficult labor. No history of contraceptive use (AOR = 3.43; 95% CI: 1.05-11.21), having a big problem of distance from the health facility (AOR = 3.7; 95% CI: 1.05-11.21), early marriage (AOR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.12-3.5), and being a rural resident (AOR = 1.5; 95% CI:1.2-5.05) were risk factors associated with obstetric fistula.

CONCLUSION: This study finding revealed that obstetric fistula is the most common devastating obstetric problem in Ethiopia. Early marriage, early initiation of sexual intercourse, distance from the health facility, no history of contraceptive use, and rural residence were the predisposing factors to develop an obstetric fistula. Thus, interventions should focus on creating community awareness regarding early marriage and its consequences, early seeking of health facility visiting, and avoiding unintended pregnancy to minimize the subsequent complications.

© 2021 Gedefaw et al.

Keywords: Ethiopia; obstetric fistula; risk factors; vaginal fistula

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Apr;38(8):1091-110 - PubMed
  2. Pan Afr Med J. 2020 May 18;36:22 - PubMed
  3. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011 May-Jun;78(3):352-61 - PubMed
  4. Afr Health Sci. 2017 Sep;17(3):671-680 - PubMed
  5. BJOG. 2014 Jul;121(8):1039-46 - PubMed
  6. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Jun;109(3):204-8 - PubMed
  7. BJOG. 2008 Nov;115(12):1564-9 - PubMed
  8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 27;18(1):269 - PubMed
  9. West Afr J Med. 2004 Jan-Mar;23(1):7-9 - PubMed
  10. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Dec 30;13:246 - PubMed
  11. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Jan;30(1):44-50 - PubMed
  12. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Apr;23(4):387-94 - PubMed
  13. BMC Womens Health. 2019 Feb 26;19(1):37 - PubMed
  14. Arch Med Sci. 2010 Apr 30;6(2):253-6 - PubMed
  15. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005 Jul;60(7 Suppl 1):S3-S51 - PubMed
  16. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Sep;94(3):254-61 - PubMed
  17. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):e40-2 - PubMed
  18. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Feb 28;13:56 - PubMed
  19. BJOG. 2007 Aug;114(8):1010-7 - PubMed
  20. J Pregnancy. 2020 Jul 1;2020:7306108 - PubMed
  21. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Fall;1(4):193-7 - PubMed
  22. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):257 - PubMed
  23. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jul 18;12:68 - PubMed
  24. BMC Womens Health. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):40 - PubMed

Publication Types