Display options
Share it on

J Patient Exp. 2021 Apr 13;8:23743735211008305. doi: 10.1177/23743735211008305. eCollection 2021.

Validation of a Patient Questionnaire Assessing Patient Satisfaction With Orthopedic Outpatient Clinic Consultation.

Journal of patient experience

Stuart Waters, Stephen Edmondston, Daniel F Gucciardi

Affiliations

  1. Osborne Park Hospital, Perth, Australia.
  2. St John of God Murdoch Private Hospital, Perth, Australia.
  3. School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

PMID: 34179434 PMCID: PMC8205371 DOI: 10.1177/23743735211008305

Abstract

Previous qualitative research has identified a number of factors which influence patient satisfaction with orthopedic outpatient clinic visits. To further evaluate these factors, the authors initially generated a number of items or statements representing these factors. This cohort of items was then subjected to analysis by an expert group to assess which 3 items best represented each factor. These items formed the basis of a draft survey which was then administered to 323 orthopedic outpatients to assess these factors as characteristics of patient satisfaction. Items and factors were also assessed against 2 global measures of patient satisfaction. One hundred and one survey responses were returned and subjected to factorial analysis. Results indicated that factors of trust, empathy, and relatedness were not distinguishable and subsequently combined to represent a single factor, the therapeutic relationship. A final 5-factor model is proposed incorporating 3 interpersonal factors (communication, expectation, therapeutic relationship) and 2 environmental factors (clinic wait time, clinical contact time). The factors identified by this study should be considered in surveys evaluating patient satisfaction with orthopedic outpatient services.

© The Author(s) 2021.

Keywords: orthopedics; patient satisfaction; survey development; survey validation

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 09;3(4): - PubMed
  2. Orthopedics. 2017 Jan 1;40(1):43-48 - PubMed
  3. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Oct;56(5):754-61 - PubMed
  4. Eval Health Prof. 2007 Dec;30(4):303-21 - PubMed
  5. JB JS Open Access. 2019 Oct 18;4(4):e0014 - PubMed
  6. Eur Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Jun;3(2):101-105 - PubMed
  7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Nov;452:35-43 - PubMed
  8. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Feb;26(2):209-13 - PubMed
  9. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jul 1;97(13):1041-8 - PubMed
  10. Man Ther. 2016 Sep;25:48-55 - PubMed
  11. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Nov;21(11):2638-46 - PubMed
  12. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(2):228-47 - PubMed
  13. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Dec;40(341):487-90 - PubMed
  14. Int Orthop. 2013 Jul;37(7):1257-61 - PubMed
  15. Med Care. 1988 Apr;26(4):393-402 - PubMed
  16. Clin Psychol Rev. 2003 Feb;23(1):1-33 - PubMed
  17. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 May;67(5):527-37 - PubMed
  18. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70 - PubMed
  19. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jan 28;15(1):28 - PubMed
  20. J Patient Exp. 2016 Jun;3(2):39-42 - PubMed
  21. Man Ther. 2014 Oct;19(5):386-91 - PubMed
  22. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Jun 1;29(3):314-326 - PubMed
  23. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jan 7;97(1):80-4 - PubMed
  24. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Oct;51(10):1804-13 - PubMed
  25. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul;7(4):325-40 - PubMed
  26. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jul-Aug;10(4):755-760 - PubMed
  27. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78 - PubMed
  28. J Community Health. 1985 Spring;10(1):42-54 - PubMed
  29. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec;14(6):433-7 - PubMed
  30. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Oct;38(8):601-16 - PubMed
  31. Phys Ther. 2015 May;95(5):767-77 - PubMed

Publication Types