Display options
Cite
Cramer ERA, Grønstøl G, Maxwell L, et al. Sperm length divergence as a potential prezygotic barrier in a passerine hybrid zone. Ecol Evol. 2021;11(14):9489-9497doi: 10.1002/ece3.7768.
Cramer, E. R. A., Grønstøl, G., Maxwell, L., Kovach, A. I., & Lifjeld, J. T. (2021). Sperm length divergence as a potential prezygotic barrier in a passerine hybrid zone. Ecology and evolution, 11(14), 9489-9497. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7768
Cramer, Emily R A, et al. "Sperm length divergence as a potential prezygotic barrier in a passerine hybrid zone." Ecology and evolution vol. 11,14 (2021): 9489-9497. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7768
Cramer ERA, Grønstøl G, Maxwell L, Kovach AI, Lifjeld JT. Sperm length divergence as a potential prezygotic barrier in a passerine hybrid zone. Ecol Evol. 2021 Jun 16;11(14):9489-9497. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7768. eCollection 2021 Jul. PMID: 34306637; PMCID: PMC8293778.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Ecol Evol. 2021 Jun 16;11(14):9489-9497. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7768. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Sperm length divergence as a potential prezygotic barrier in a passerine hybrid zone.

Ecology and evolution

Emily R A Cramer, Gaute Grønstøl, Logan Maxwell, Adrienne I Kovach, Jan T Lifjeld

Affiliations

  1. Natural History Museum University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
  2. Natural Resources and the Environment University of New Hampshire Durham NH USA.

PMID: 34306637 PMCID: PMC8293778 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7768

Abstract

The saltmarsh sparrow

© 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords: hybridization; phenotypic divergence; postmating prezygotic barriers; speciation; sperm morphology

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Am Nat. 2014 Apr;183(4):565-72 - PubMed
  2. Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Dec;32(12):964-976 - PubMed
  3. Evolution. 2018 Oct;72(10):2076-2089 - PubMed
  4. Curr Biol. 2021 Apr 12;31(7):1547-1554.e5 - PubMed
  5. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 Mar;10(2):378-84 - PubMed
  6. Ecol Evol. 2016 Jan 30;6(5):1363-77 - PubMed
  7. Anim Reprod Sci. 1998 Dec 1;54(1):45-54 - PubMed
  8. Anim Reprod Sci. 1999 Dec 15;57(3-4):229-35 - PubMed
  9. Evolution. 2007 Nov;61(11):2596-606 - PubMed
  10. J Morphol. 2015 Apr;276(4):370-7 - PubMed
  11. BMC Evol Biol. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):169 - PubMed
  12. Ecol Evol. 2019 Nov 07;9(23):13477-13494 - PubMed
  13. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1001:91-103 - PubMed
  14. BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):14 - PubMed
  15. Evolution. 2009 Sep;63(9):2466-73 - PubMed
  16. Evolution. 2009 Mar;63(3):613-23 - PubMed
  17. Evolution. 2016 Aug;70(8):1844-55 - PubMed
  18. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Nov;85(4):935-56 - PubMed
  19. Evolution. 2008 Feb;62(2):494-9 - PubMed
  20. Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 16;284(1860): - PubMed
  21. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37135 - PubMed
  22. Theriogenology. 2011 Mar 1;75(4):589-601 - PubMed
  23. J Evol Biol. 2019 Sep;32(9):900-912 - PubMed
  24. J Evol Biol. 2007 May;20(3):937-49 - PubMed
  25. Ecol Evol. 2015 Dec 29;6(1):279-94 - PubMed
  26. Mol Ecol. 2008 Feb;17(4):1108-21 - PubMed
  27. Evolution. 2019 Feb;73(2):202-213 - PubMed
  28. Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 1;27(15):2156-8 - PubMed
  29. Biol Lett. 2013 Apr 10;9(3):20130169 - PubMed
  30. Evolution. 2015 Apr;69(4):1044-52 - PubMed
  31. Genetica. 2011 May;139(5):649-61 - PubMed
  32. Anim Reprod Sci. 2014 Nov 30;150(3-4):130-8 - PubMed
  33. BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Mar 22;16:65 - PubMed
  34. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 18;5(10):e13456 - PubMed
  35. Evolution. 2011 Oct;65(10):3006-12 - PubMed
  36. Cells. 2021 Mar 11;10(3): - PubMed
  37. Evolution. 1997 Jun;51(3):937-945 - PubMed

Publication Types