Display options
Share it on

Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2021 Jul 05;12:21526567211026568. doi: 10.1177/21526567211026568. eCollection 2021.

Diagnosis of Anosmia and Hyposmia: A Systematic Review.

Allergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.)

Abdul K Saltagi, Mohamad Z Saltagi, Amit K Nag, Arthur W Wu, Thomas S Higgins, Anna Knisely, Jonathan Y Ting, Elisa A Illing

Affiliations

  1. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  3. Division of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Division of Otolaryngology, Los Angeles, California.
  4. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
  5. Kentuckiana Ear, Nose & Throat.
  6. Otolaryngology, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA.

PMID: 34285823 PMCID: PMC8264728 DOI: 10.1177/21526567211026568

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anosmia and hyposmia have many etiologies, including trauma, chronic sinusitis, neoplasms, and respiratory viral infections such as rhinovirus and SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to systematically review the literature on the diagnostic evaluation of anosmia/hyposmia.

METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published since January 1990 using terms combined with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). We included articles evaluating diagnostic modalities for anosmia, written in the English language, used original data, and had two or more patients.

RESULTS: A total of 2065 unique titles were returned upon the initial search. Of these, 226 abstracts were examined, yielding 27 full-text articles meeting inclusion criteria (Level of evidence ranging from 1 to 4; most level 2). The studies included a total of 13,577 patients. The most utilized diagnostic tools were orthonasal smell tests (such as the Sniffin' Sticks and the UPSIT, along with validated abridged smell tests). Though various imaging modalities (including MRI and CT) were frequently mentioned in the workup of olfactory dysfunction, routine imaging was not used to primarily diagnose smell loss.

CONCLUSION: The literature includes several studies on validity and reliability for various smell tests in diagnosing anosmia. Along with a thorough history and physical, validated orthonasal smell tests should be part of the workup of the patient with suspected olfactory dysfunction. The most widely studied modality was MRI, but criteria for the timing and sequence of imaging modalities was heterogenous.

© The Author(s) 2021.

Keywords: COVID-19; MRI; OERP; SARS-CoV-2; SPECT; anosmia; diagnosis; fMRI; hyposmia; infection; smell loss; smell test; trauma; viral

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Laryngoscope. 2005 Dec;115(12):2209-12 - PubMed
  2. Laryngoscope. 2005 Jun;115(6):1114-7 - PubMed
  3. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 May;275(5):1129-1137 - PubMed
  4. Proc Nutr Soc. 2012 Nov;71(4):488-501 - PubMed
  5. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Sep;163(3):465-470 - PubMed
  6. Behav Brain Res. 2006 Jun 3;170(1):78-83 - PubMed
  7. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Nov;131(11):977-81 - PubMed
  8. Laryngoscope. 2014 Feb;124(2):365-8 - PubMed
  9. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Feb;9(2):158-164 - PubMed
  10. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Jan;16(1):e7926 - PubMed
  11. Chem Senses. 2014 Mar;39(3):185-94 - PubMed
  12. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Jun;123(6):591-4 - PubMed
  13. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998 Jun;13(3):63-72 - PubMed
  14. Laryngoscope. 2007 Jun;117(6):1096-101 - PubMed
  15. Rev Med Liege. 2013 Dec;68(12):644-9 - PubMed
  16. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jul;163(1):145-150 - PubMed
  17. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):409-12 - PubMed
  18. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Oct;163(4):853 - PubMed
  19. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1996 Dec;21(6):512-8 - PubMed
  20. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;276(3):719-728 - PubMed
  21. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Aug;10(8):944-950 - PubMed
  22. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):e145-8 - PubMed
  23. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011 Feb;38(1):65-72 - PubMed
  24. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Oct;163(4):676-681 - PubMed
  25. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Dec;39(12):2320-2325 - PubMed
  26. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 May;258(4):168-72 - PubMed
  27. BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919 - PubMed
  28. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001 Jun;16(3):253-9 - PubMed
  29. Cleve Clin J Med. 2002 Apr;69(4):329-36 - PubMed
  30. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012 May-Jun;26(3):204-8 - PubMed
  31. Rhinology. 2010 Jun;48(2):156-9 - PubMed
  32. Chem Senses. 2016 May;41(4):339-44 - PubMed
  33. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999 Sep-Oct;23(5):767-75 - PubMed
  34. Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Jan 21;11:99-105 - PubMed
  35. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998 Jan-Feb;22(1):96-103 - PubMed
  36. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 May;127(5):497-503 - PubMed
  37. Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):469-73 - PubMed
  38. Psychol Sci. 2010 Oct;21(10):1454-63 - PubMed
  39. Chem Senses. 2017 Sep 1;42(7):513-523 - PubMed
  40. Am J Rhinol. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(6):577-81 - PubMed
  41. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Dec;132(12):1346-51 - PubMed
  42. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12 - PubMed
  43. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020 Jan;129(1):39-45 - PubMed
  44. Rhinol Suppl. 2017 Mar;54(26):1-30 - PubMed
  45. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57671 - PubMed

Publication Types