Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Aug 17;1-15. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1962983. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
Circulating biomarkers associated with performance and resilience during military operational stress.
European journal of sport science
Meaghan E Beckner, Luana Main, Jamie L Tait, Brian J Martin, William R Conkright, Bradley C Nindl
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Neuromuscular Research Laboratory/Warrior Human Performance Research Center. Department of Sports Medicine and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
PMID: 34346851
DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1962983
Abstract
Adaptation to military operational stress is a complex physiological response that calls upon the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis and immune system, to create a delicate balance between anabolism and catabolism and meet the demands of an ever-changing environment. As such, resilience, the ability to withstand and overcome the negative impact of stress on military performance, is likely grounded in an appropriate biological adaptation to encountered stressors. Neuroendocrine [i.e. cortisol, epinephrine (EPI), norepinephrine (NE), neuropeptide-Y (NPY), and brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF)], inflammatory [i.e. interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-1β, IL-4, IL-10 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α], as well as growth and anabolic [i.e. insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), testosterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)] biomarkers independently and interactively function in stress adaptations that are associated with a soldier's physical and psychological performance. In this narrative review, we detail biomarkers across neuroendocrine, inflammatory, and growth stimulating domains to better elucidate the biological basis of a resilient soldier. The findings from the reviewed studies indicate that military readiness and resiliency may be enhanced through better homeostatic control, better regulated inflammatory responses, and balanced anabolic/catabolic processes. It is unlikely that one class of biomarkers is better for assessing physiological resilience. Therefore, a biomarker panel that can account for appropriate balance across these domains may be superior in developing monitoring frameworks. Real-time physiological monitoring to assess biomarkers associated with resilience will be possible pending more sophisticated technologies and provide a field-expedient application for early identification and intervention of at-risk soldiers to improve military resiliency.
Keywords: Biomarker; cytokines; growth factor; neuroendocrine; resilience; stress adaptation
Publication Types
