J Belg Soc Radiol. 2021 Jul 29;105(1):41. doi: 10.5334/jbsr.2405. eCollection 2021.
Getting Rid of Patient's Misconceptions About the Radiology Department Using Animated Video in the Waiting Room.
Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology
Michel Lavaerts, Hilde Vandenhout, Raymond Oyen, Chantal Van Ongeval
PMID: 34396038
PMCID: PMC8323534 DOI: 10.5334/jbsr.2405
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Patients often confuse the role of the radiologist with that of the technician. The aim of this study is to explore patients' current perceptions about the radiology department and to evaluate how it's possible to get rid of misconceptions using informative animated video in the waiting room.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multi-centric study (UZ Leuven, ZNA Middelheim), 278 patients of all ages and education levels were surveyed in the radiology waiting room. 107 patients filled out the survey after watching an informative animated video (
RESULTS: Half of the patients (86/171) in the non-video group believe the radiologist "performs the scanning", compared to 19% (20/107) in the video group (p < 0.001). Patients who think their own physician will interpret the images is 36% (61/171) in the non-video group and 10% (11/107) in the video group (p < 0.001). In the non-video group, 32% (55/171) believe the technician performs the exam compared to 59% (63/107) in the video group (p < 0.001). After the video, 67% (72/107) of patients have more respect for the work of the radiologist, 52% (56/107) experience less anxiety and 65% (70/107) think the video is of added value to their visit. All items showed a better impact in high-educational subgroups.
CONCLUSION: Animated informative videos help to increase patient knowledge about the radiology department. It moderates expectations, reduces anxiety, and ameliorates the overall experience. Although, the learning curve is steeper in highly educated patients, all educational levels benefit.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s).
Keywords: Animated Video; Education; Learning-curve; Misconception; Radiology; Waiting Room
Conflict of interest statement
The video itself is copyrighted however the concept of the video (“the story”) is free to copy, and is even encouraged by the author. The author sold personalized/branded variants of this video to hos
References
- PLoS One. 2019 Jul 16;14(7):e0219506 - PubMed
- Anesth Analg. 2011 Jun;112(6):1314-8 - PubMed
- CJEM. 2008 Jul;10(4):347-54 - PubMed
- J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4):1300-5 - PubMed
- Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 May 01;12:805-810 - PubMed
- Br J Radiol. 2012 Dec;85(1020):e1184-9 - PubMed
- Eur Radiol. 2009 Oct;19(10):2326-32 - PubMed
- Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1087):20170719 - PubMed
- Dermatol Surg. 2018 Jun;44(6):778-784 - PubMed
- Radiol Bras. 2018 Mar-Apr;51(2):109-111 - PubMed
- AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Jul;163(1):11-5 - PubMed
- Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019 May - Jun;48(3):210-215 - PubMed
- CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Fall;6(3):217-23 - PubMed
- J Cancer Educ. 2017 Jun;32(2):219-227 - PubMed
- Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):17-28 - PubMed
- Radiology. 2000 Jan;214(1):15-23 - PubMed
Publication Types