Display options
Share it on

Med Sci Educ. 2019 Jul 29;29(4):947-957. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00779-1. eCollection 2019 Dec.

A Practical Approach to Integrating Communication Skills and Early Clinical Experience into the Preclinical Medical School Curriculum.

Medical science educator

Amal Shibli-Rahhal, Anthony Brenneman, Megan McVancel, Marcy Rosenbaum

Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 1216H MERF, 375 Newton Rd, Iowa City, IA 52242-2600 USA.
  2. Physician Assistant Program, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA USA.
  3. University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA USA.
  4. Office of Consultation and Research in Medical Education and Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA USA.

PMID: 34457571 PMCID: PMC8368819 DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00779-1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective integration of early clinical experiences (ECE) with preclinical curricula is challenging, given the limited knowledge-base of students and the unpredictability of clinical environments. Integration of ECE with communication skills (CS) training presents an attractive opportunity since CSs apply to all types of clinical encounters and are independent of students' medical knowledge. We present an ECE program that integrates formal CS training with the realities of clinical practice.

METHODS: Five ECE sessions occur throughout the first year of medical school, each focusing on a specific set of CSs previously introduced in class. Students actively observe preceptors use these skills, briefly practice them, write a critical analysis on each experience, and discuss these in small groups. To identify the perceived usefulness and impact of the ECE on students' CS learning, we analyzed the critical analyses and post intervention evaluations from students and preceptors. Descriptive analyses used SAS for Windows. Thematic content analysis using constant comparison was used to review and code narrative data, and the most commonly referred to impacts, strengths, and limitations of ECE were identified.

RESULTS: Analysis of the students' critical analyses identified the following main themes: (1) integration between ECE and formal CS teaching, (2) importance of effective CS to the delivery of good patient care, and (3) adaptability of CS to specific clinical contexts. Preceptors did not perceive the program as an added burden.

CONCLUSIONS: ECE with focused goals, critical analyses, and small group debriefing can be used to effectively teach and reinforce formal classroom CS training.

© International Association of Medical Science Educators 2019.

Keywords: Communication skills; Early clinical experience; Integration; Preceptorship; Preclinical

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Med Educ. 2003 Jan;37(1):32-8 - PubMed
  2. Med Teach. 2003 Mar;25(2):155-60 - PubMed
  3. BMJ. 1999 Oct 30;319(7218):1168-71 - PubMed
  4. Med Educ. 2011 Jul;45(7):731-40 - PubMed
  5. Acad Med. 2001 Apr;76(4 Suppl):S117-20 - PubMed
  6. Acad Med. 1998 Jan;73(1):41-7 - PubMed
  7. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Dec;13(5):633-47 - PubMed
  8. Tex Med. 1998 Mar;94(3):58-63 - PubMed
  9. Fam Med. 1996 Oct;28(9):634-9 - PubMed
  10. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Sep;76(3):385-90 - PubMed
  11. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Oct;47(423):623-6 - PubMed
  12. Eur J Gen Pract. 2009;15(1):4-10 - PubMed
  13. Acad Med. 2001 Apr;76(4 Suppl):S131-3 - PubMed
  14. Med Educ. 2007 Feb;41(2):154-9 - PubMed
  15. Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):237-45 - PubMed
  16. Med Educ. 2000 May;34(5):404-8 - PubMed
  17. J Cancer Educ. 1987;2(2):107-11 - PubMed
  18. Teach Learn Med. 2001 Winter;13(1):13-20 - PubMed
  19. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 May 3;292(6529):1177-80 - PubMed
  20. Med Teach. 2010;32(9):740-6 - PubMed
  21. Med Teach. 2008;30(8):802-8 - PubMed
  22. Acad Med. 1999 Jan;74(1 Suppl):S53-8 - PubMed
  23. Acad Med. 2001 Apr;76(4 Suppl):S121-6 - PubMed
  24. BMJ. 2004 Oct 9;329(7470):834 - PubMed
  25. Acad Med. 1995 Jan;70(1 Suppl):S64-8 - PubMed
  26. Med Educ. 2001 Sep;35(9):901-8 - PubMed
  27. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Aug;46(409):457-60 - PubMed
  28. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Nov;100(11):2054-2061 - PubMed
  29. Med Educ. 1998 Sep;32(5):495-501 - PubMed
  30. Acad Med. 2001 May;76(5):489-92 - PubMed
  31. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004 Mar;17(1):42-52 - PubMed
  32. Med Teach. 2006 Feb;28(1):3-18 - PubMed
  33. BMC Med Educ. 2008 Dec 02;8:56 - PubMed
  34. J Med Educ. 1983 Mar;58(3):179-85 - PubMed
  35. Acad Med. 1989 Jun;64(6):285-94 - PubMed
  36. Med Teach. 2003 Mar;25(2):161-6 - PubMed
  37. Med Educ Online. 2014 Jul 22;19:24829 - PubMed
  38. Med Educ. 1979 Sep;13(5):336-41 - PubMed
  39. Acta Med Acad. 2012;41(1):38-46 - PubMed
  40. Acad Med. 2001 Apr;76(4 Suppl):S93-6 - PubMed
  41. Acad Med. 1999 Jan;74(1 Suppl):S59-66 - PubMed
  42. Acad Med. 2001 Apr;76(4 Suppl):S49-54 - PubMed
  43. Med Teach. 2007 Oct;29(8):806-13 - PubMed
  44. Med Educ. 1983 Mar;17(2):100-4 - PubMed

Publication Types