Display options
Share it on

Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;23(11):2937-2947. doi: 10.1111/codi.15878. Epub 2021 Sep 07.

Time interval between rectal cancer resection and reintervention for anastomotic leakage and the impact of a defunctioning stoma: A Dutch population-based study.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

Anne-Loes K Warps, Rob A E M Tollenaar, Pieter J Tanis, Jan Willem T Dekker,

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  2. Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  3. Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  4. Department of surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, The Netherlands.

PMID: 34407272 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15878

Abstract

AIM: In the Netherlands, a selective policy of faecal diversion after rectal cancer surgery is generally applied. This study aimed to evaluate the timing, type, and short-term outcomes of reoperation for anastomotic leakage after primary rectal cancer resection stratified for a defunctioning stoma.

METHOD: Data of all patients who underwent primary rectal cancer surgery with primary anastomosis from 2013-2019 were extracted from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit. Primary outcomes were new stoma construction, mortality, ICU admission, prolonged hospital stay, and readmission.

RESULTS: In total, 10,772 rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery with primary anastomosis were included, of whom 46.6% received a primary defunctioning stoma. The reintervention rate for anastomotic leakage was 8.2% and 11.6% for patients with and without a defunctioning stoma (p < 0.001). Reintervention consisted of reoperation in 44.0% and 85.3% (p < 0.001), with a median time interval from primary resection to reoperation of seven days (IQR 4-14) vs. five days (IQR 3-13), respectively. In the presence of a defunctioning stoma, early reoperation (<5 days; n = 47) was associated with significantly more end-colostomy construction (51% vs. 33%) and ICU admission (66% vs. 38%) than late reoperation (≥5 days; n = 127). Without defunctioning stoma, early reoperation (n = 252) was associated with significantly higher mortality (4% vs. 1%), and more ICU admissions (52% vs.34%) than late reoperation (n = 302).

CONCLUSIONS: Early reoperations after rectal cancer resection are associated with worse outcomes reflected by a more frequent ICU admission in general, more colostomy construction, and higher mortality in patients with primary defunctioned and nondefunctioned anastomosis.

© 2021 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Keywords: anastomotic leakage; rectal cancer; reoperation; stoma; surgery; time interval

References

  1. Mik M, Magdzinska J, Dziki L, Tchorzewski M, Trzcinski R, Dziki A. Relaparotomy in colorectal cancer surgery - do any factors influence the risk of mortality? A case controlled study. Int J Surg. 2014;12(11):1192-7. - PubMed
  2. Snijders HS, Wouters M, van Leersum NJ, Kolfschoten NE, Henneman D, de Vries AC, et al. Meta-analysis of the risk for anastomotic leakage, the postoperative mortality caused by leakage in relation to the overall postoperative mortality. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(11):1013-9. - PubMed
  3. Henneman D, ten Berge MG, Snijders HS, van Leersum NJ, Fiocco M, Wiggers T, et al. Safety of elective colorectal cancer surgery: Non-surgical complications and colectomies are targets for quality improvement. J Surg Oncol. 2014;109(6):567-73. - PubMed
  4. Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M, Regimbeau JM, Valleur P. Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189(6):554-9. - PubMed
  5. Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, Burns B, Cataldo PA. Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it’s later than you think. Ann Surg. 2007;245(2):254-8. - PubMed
  6. Borstlap WAA, Westerduin E, Aukema TS, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus formation after low anterior resection. Ann Surg. 2017;266(5):870-7. - PubMed
  7. Lim SB, Yu CS, Kim CW, Yoon YS, Park IJ, Kim JC. Late anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: clinical characteristics and predisposing factors. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(4):O135-40. - PubMed
  8. Matthiessen P, Lindgren R, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R. Symptomatic anastomotic leakage diagnosed after hospital discharge following low anterior resection for cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2009;12(7):e82-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01938.x - PubMed
  9. Sparreboom CL, van Groningen JT, Lingsma HF, Wouters MWJM, Menon AG, Kleinrensink G-J, et al. Different risk factors for early and late colorectal anastomotic leakage in a nationwide audit. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(11):1258-66. - PubMed
  10. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, et al. Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision results from the international TATME registry. Ann Surg. 2019;269(4):700-11. - PubMed
  11. Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, Mancuso CA, Lee SW, Sonoda T, et al. Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):108-13. - PubMed
  12. Lipska MA, Bissett IP, Parry BR, Merrie AEH. Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(7):579-85. - PubMed
  13. Parthasarathy M, Greensmith M, Bowers D, Groot-Wassink T. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: a retrospective analysis of 17 518 patients. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19(3):288-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13476 - PubMed
  14. Jestin P, Påhlman L, Gunnarsson U. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a case-control study. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(7):715-21. - PubMed
  15. Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(1):37-43. - PubMed
  16. den Dulk M, Noter SL, Hendriks ER, Brouwers M, van der Vlies CH, Oostenbroek RJ, et al. Improved diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(4):420-6. - PubMed
  17. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147(3):339-51. - PubMed
  18. Doeksen A, Tanis PJ, Vrouenraets BC, van Lanschot JJB, van Tets WF. Factors determining delay in relaparotomy for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(27):3721-5. - PubMed
  19. Jutesten H, Draus J, Frey J, Neovius G, Lindmark G, Buchwald P, et al. Late leakage after anterior resection: a defunctioning stoma alters the clinical course of anastomotic leakage. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20(2):150-9. - PubMed
  20. Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(2):207-14. - PubMed
  21. Peeters KCMJ, Tollenaar RAEM, Marijnen CAM, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92(2):211-6. - PubMed
  22. Phan K, Oh L, Ctercteko G, Pathma-Nathan N, El Khoury T, Azam H, et al. Does a stoma reduce the risk of anastomotic leak and need for re-operation following low anterior resection for rectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;10(2):179-87. - PubMed
  23. Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96(5):462-72. - PubMed
  24. Emmanuel A, Chohda E, Lapa C, Miles A, Haji A, Ellul J. Defunctioning stomas result in significantly more short-term complications following low anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2018;42(11):3755-64. - PubMed
  25. Näsvall P, Dahlstrand U, Löwenmark T, Rutegård J, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K. Quality of life in patients with a permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(1):55-64. - PubMed
  26. Floodeen H, Hallböök O, Hagberg LA, Matthiessen P. Costs and resource use following defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for cancer - a long-term analysis of a randomized multicenter trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(2):330-6. - PubMed
  27. Chapman WC, Subramanian M, Jayarajan S, Makhdoom B, Mutch MG, Hunt S, et al. First, do no harm: rethinking routine diversion in sphincter-preserving rectal cancer resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;228(4):547-556.e8. - PubMed
  28. Van Westreenen HL, Visser A, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA. Morbidity related to defunctioning ileostomy closure after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and low colonic anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(1):49-54. - PubMed
  29. Blok RD, Stam R, Westerduin E, Borstlap W, Hompes R, Bemelman WA, et al. Impact of an institutional change from routine to highly selective diversion of a low anastomosis after TME for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(8):1220-5. - PubMed
  30. Kim MJ, Kim YS, Park SC, Sohn DK, Kim DY, Chang HJ, et al. Risk factors for permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery with temporary ileostomy. Surgery. 2016;159(3):721-7. - PubMed
  31. Pan H-D, Peng Y-F, Wang L, Li M, Yao Y-F, Zhao J, et al. Risk factors for nonclosure of a temporary defunctioning ileostomy following anterior resection of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(2):94-100. - PubMed
  32. den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters KCMJ, Kranenbarg E-K, Rutten HJT, Wiggers T, et al. A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(4):297-303. - PubMed
  33. Jutesten H, Draus J, Frey J, Neovius G, Lindmark G, Buchwald P, et al. High risk of permanent stoma after anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2019;21(2):174-82. - PubMed
  34. Snijders HS, van Leersum NJ, Henneman D, de Vries AC, Tollenaar RAEM, Stiggelbout AM, et al. Optimal treatment strategy in rectal cancer surgery: should we be cowboys or chickens? Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(11):3582-9. - PubMed
  35. Li Y-W, Lian P, Huang B, Zheng H-T, Wang M-H, Gu W-L, et al. Very early colorectal anastomotic leakage within 5 post-operative days: a more severe subtype needs relaparatomy. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39936. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39936 - PubMed
  36. Lennard TWJ, Shenton BK, Borzotta A, Donnelly PK, White M, Gerrie LM, et al. The influence of surgical operations on components of the human immune system. Br J Surg. 1985;72(10):771-6. - PubMed
  37. Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85(1):109-17. - PubMed
  38. Sheeran P, Hall GM. Cytokines in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(2):201-19. - PubMed
  39. Rettig TCD, Verwijmeren L, Dijkstra IM, Boerma D, Van De Garde EMW, Noordzij PG. Postoperative interleukin-6 level and early detection of complications after elective major abdominal surgery. Ann Surg. 2016;263(6):1207-12. - PubMed
  40. Wakefield CH, Carey PD, Foulds S, Monson JRT, Guillou PJ. Changes in major histocompatibility complex class II expression in monocytes and T cells of patients developing infection after surgery. Br J Surg. 1993;80(2):205-9. - PubMed
  41. Hack CE, De Groot ER, Felt-Bersma RJF, Nuijens JH, Strack Van Schijndel RJM, Eerenberg-Belmer AJM, et al. Increased plasma levels of interleukin-6 in sepsis. Blood. 1989;74(5):1704-10. - PubMed
  42. Blackwell TS, Christman JW. Sepsis and cytokines: current status. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77(1):110-7. - PubMed
  43. Bozza FA, Salluh JI, Japiassu AM, Soares M, Assis EF, Gomes RN, et al. Cytokine profiles as markers of disease severity in sepsis: a multiplex analysis. Crit Care. 2007;11:R49. - PubMed
  44. Beirens K, Penninckx F. Defunctioning stoma and anastomotic leak rate after total mesorectal excision with coloanal anastomosis in the context of PROCARE. Acta Chir Belg. 2012;112(1-2):10-4. - PubMed
  45. Montedori A, Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Sciannameo F, Abraha I. Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. - PubMed
  46. Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Kleeff J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248(1):52-60. - PubMed
  47. Poon RTP, Chu KW, Ho JWC, Chan CW, Law WL, Wong J. Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. World J Surg. 1999;23(5):463-8. - PubMed
  48. Schlesinger NH, Smith H. The effect of a diverting stoma on morbidity and risk of permanent stoma following anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35(10):1903-10. - PubMed
  49. Shimizu H, Yamaguchi S, Ishii T, Kondo H, Hara K, Takemoto K, et al. Who needs diverting ileostomy following laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients? Analysis of 417 patients in a single institute. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(2):839-46. - PubMed
  50. Khan AA, Wheeler JMD, Cunningham C, George B, Kettlewell M, Mortensen NJMC. The management and outcome of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(6):587-92. - PubMed
  51. Thornton M, Joshi H, Vimalachandran C, Heath R, Carter P, Gur U, et al. Management and outcome of colorectal anastomotic leaks. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(3):313-20. - PubMed
  52. Talboom K, Vogel I, Blok RD, Roodbeen SX, Ponsioen CY, Bemelman WA, et al. Highly selective diversion with proactive leakage management after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2021;108(6):609-12. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article/108/6/609/6126006. - PubMed

Publication Types