Display options
Cite
Marinaci T, Venuleo C, Gennaro A, et al. Making sense of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative longitudinal study investigating the first and second wave in Italy. Heliyon. 2021;7(9):e07891doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07891.
Marinaci, T., Venuleo, C., Gennaro, A., & Sammut, G. (2021). Making sense of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative longitudinal study investigating the first and second wave in Italy. Heliyon, 7(9), e07891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07891
Marinaci, Tiziana, et al. "Making sense of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative longitudinal study investigating the first and second wave in Italy." Heliyon vol. 7,9 (2021): e07891. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07891
Marinaci T, Venuleo C, Gennaro A, Sammut G. Making sense of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative longitudinal study investigating the first and second wave in Italy. Heliyon. 2021 Sep;7(9):e07891. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07891. Epub 2021 Sep 01. PMID: 34493989; PMCID: PMC8413190.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Heliyon. 2021 Sep;7(9):e07891. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07891. Epub 2021 Sep 01.

Making sense of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative longitudinal study investigating the first and second wave in Italy.

Heliyon

Tiziana Marinaci, Claudia Venuleo, Alessandro Gennaro, Gordon Sammut

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Applied Psychology and Intervention, Department of History, Society and Human Studies, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy.
  2. Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  3. Department of Psychology, University of Malta, Malta.

PMID: 34493989 PMCID: PMC8413190 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07891

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic further highlighted the crucial role of people's compliance for the success of measures designed to protect public health. Within the frame of Semiotic Cultural Psycho-social Theory, we discuss how the analysis of people's ways of making sense of the crisis scenario can help to identify the resources or constraints underlying the ways the citizens evaluate and comply with the anti-covid measures. This study aimed to examine how Italian adults interpreted what was happening in the first wave of the pandemic and how the interpretation varied in the period up to the beginning of the second wave. Diaries were collected for six months, from 11 April to 3 November 2020. Participants were periodically asked to talk about their life 'in the last few weeks'. A total number of 606 diaries were collected. The Automated Method for Content Analysis (ACASM) procedure was applied to the texts to detect the factorial dimensions - interpreted as the markers of latent dimensions of meanings- underpinning (dis)similarities in the respondents' discourses. ANOVA were applied to examine the dissimilarities in the association between factorial dimensions and production time. Findings show that significant transitions occurred over time in the main dimensions of meaning identified. Whereas the first phase was characterized by a focus on one's own daily life and the attempt to make sense of the changes occurring in the personal sphere, in the following phases the socio-economic impact of the crisis was brought to the fore, along with the hope to returning to the "normality" of the pre-rupture scenario. We argued that, despite the differences, a low sense of the interweaving between the personal and public sphere emerged in the accounts of the pandemic crisis throughout the sixth months considered; a split that, we speculate, can explain the "free for all" movement that occurred at the end of the first wave and the beginning of the second wave.

© 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords: COVID-19; Diaries; Longitudinal qualitative study; Semiotic cultural psycho-social theory; Sensemaking

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 04;7:141 - PubMed
  2. Environ Pollut. 2020 Sep;264:114732 - PubMed
  3. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 May;26(5):1049-1052 - PubMed
  4. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(15):19147-19154 - PubMed
  5. Acta Biomed. 2020 Nov 30;91(12-S):e2020017 - PubMed
  6. BMJ. 2005 Nov 26;331(7527):1234 - PubMed
  7. Psychother Res. 2012;22(3):256-73 - PubMed
  8. Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 11;11:1821 - PubMed
  9. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 21;11:559288 - PubMed
  10. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2020 Jun 4;:1-9 - PubMed
  11. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0242398 - PubMed
  12. Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 21;12:633550 - PubMed
  13. Cities. 2020 Dec;107:102869 - PubMed
  14. Science. 2021 Feb 19;371(6531): - PubMed
  15. Public Underst Sci. 2013 Nov;22(8):1011-24 - PubMed
  16. Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1225-1228 - PubMed
  17. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 17;11:577077 - PubMed
  18. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0122970 - PubMed
  19. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 31;11:748 - PubMed
  20. BMC Res Notes. 2016 Mar 02;9:136 - PubMed
  21. EPJ Data Sci. 2021;10(1):34 - PubMed
  22. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1): - PubMed
  23. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jul;4(7):677-687 - PubMed
  24. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):1972 - PubMed
  25. Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):931-934 - PubMed
  26. Health Commun. 2019 Apr;34(4):437-455 - PubMed
  27. Environ Res. 2021 Jul 16;:111678 - PubMed
  28. Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Dec 30;9(1): - PubMed
  29. Br J Health Psychol. 2021 Sep;26(3):935-957 - PubMed
  30. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 27;15(10):e0240876 - PubMed
  31. Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 14;12:640955 - PubMed
  32. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0246317 - PubMed
  33. Health Policy Plan. 2021 Apr 21;36(3):360-368 - PubMed
  34. Psychother Res. 2017 Jan;27(1):38-50 - PubMed
  35. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0240349 - PubMed
  36. J Public Econ. 2020 Dec;192:104316 - PubMed
  37. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 3;13(1):e0189885 - PubMed
  38. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 10;729:138474 - PubMed
  39. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Aug;139:9-17 - PubMed
  40. Atmos Pollut Res. 2021 Jan;12(1):437-445 - PubMed
  41. Am J Infect Control. 2006 May;34(4):176-81 - PubMed
  42. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 02;11:561747 - PubMed
  43. Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):797-824 - PubMed
  44. Curr Psychol. 2021 Jul 13;:1-11 - PubMed
  45. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 10;11:556 - PubMed
  46. Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 27;12(1):4570 - PubMed
  47. J Adv Nurs. 2003 Jul;43(1):71-81 - PubMed
  48. Public Health. 2014 Aug;128(8):709-15 - PubMed
  49. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 May;4:100061 - PubMed
  50. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 10;729:139051 - PubMed
  51. BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Sep 30;11:257 - PubMed
  52. Psychol Health Med. 2021 Jan;26(1):35-43 - PubMed
  53. Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113501 - PubMed
  54. JMIR Infodemiology. 2021 Aug 06;1(1):e29929 - PubMed
  55. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 18;18(14): - PubMed
  56. BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 28;21(1):818 - PubMed
  57. Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 16;12:565845 - PubMed
  58. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(1):20-46 - PubMed
  59. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;35(8):785-788 - PubMed
  60. J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:263-268 - PubMed

Publication Types