Display options
Share it on

Eye Brain. 2021 Aug 24;13:219-229. doi: 10.2147/EB.S305822. eCollection 2021.

Efficacy and Safety of Proton Beam Therapy for Primary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma.

Eye and brain

Rabih Hage, Claire Alapetite, Hervé Brisse, Kevin Zuber, Augustin Lecler, Guillaume Lot, Caroline Le Guerinel, Catherine Vignal-Clermont, Herve Boissonnet

Affiliations

  1. Neuro-ophthalmology Department, Hôpital Fondation A. de Rothschild, Paris, France.
  2. Radiation Oncology Department, and Proton Center Institut Curie, Paris-Orsay, France.
  3. Imaging Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
  4. Université des Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France.
  5. Department of Statistics and Clinical Research, Hôpital Fondation A. de Rothschild, Paris, France.
  6. Radiology Department, Hôpital Fondation A. de Rothschild, Paris, France.
  7. Neurosurgery Department, Hôpital Fondation A. de Rothschild, Paris, France.

PMID: 34466049 PMCID: PMC8402992 DOI: 10.2147/EB.S305822

Abstract

PURPOSE: Management of optic nerve sheath meningiomas (ONSM) remains challenging. Photon radiation therapy (PhRT) is the most common treatment for sight-threatening ONSM. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is less commonly used because it is more expensive and because there are questions about its efficacy specifically in relation to ONSM. PBT has the theoretical advantage of reducing radiation exposure to adjacent structures. We report the visual outcome of patients with primary ONSM managed at the Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France, and treated with PBT at the Centre de Protonthérapie, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with primary ONSM who received PBT (either by itself or following surgery) between January 2006 and January 2019. Neuro-ophthalmic examinations were performed at presentation and after radiotherapy, and, when applicable, after surgery. Meningiomas were measured at the time of diagnosis and at each follow-up MRI examination.

RESULTS: Sixty patients (50 women, 10 men; mean age, 45.2±11.1y) were included, of whom 29 underwent surgery. At presentation, 52 (87%) of them had decreased vision (average visual acuity: 0.6 logMAR). Fundus examination showed optic disc swelling (n=27; 46.5%), optic disc pallor (n=22; 37.9%), optic disc cupping (n=2; 3.4%), opto-ciliary shunt (n=8; 13.8%), or choroidal folds (n=5; 8.6%). Otherwise, it was unremarkable (n=7; 12.1%). After treatment, visual function was stable overall. Fundus examination showed pallor (n=47; 83.9%), swelling (n=3; 5.4%), or cupping (n=2; 3.4%) of the optic disc, or was unremarkable (n=5; 8.9%). The visual field of 8 patients worsened, while 3 developed asymptomatic retinal hemorrhages. Tumor shrunk significantly in 8 patients at 1 year after PBT and remained stable in size in all others. Patients with opto-ciliary shunts had significantly worse visual outcome than other patients. Retinal abnormalities were observed in 11 patients during follow-up.

CONCLUSION: PBT alone or in association with surgery appears to be a safe and efficient treatment for ONSM, reducing the tumor size and stabilizing visual function. The risk of developing radiation retinopathy seems to be higher when patients had upfront surgery.

© 2021 Hage et al.

Keywords: ONSM; PBT; RON; brain tumor; compressive optic neuropathy; optic nerve sheath meningioma; opto-ciliary shunt; proton beam therapy; radiation retinopathy; visual loss

Conflict of interest statement

All authors report no conflicts of interest related to this study.

References

  1. Radiat Oncol. 2019 Dec 27;14(1):240 - PubMed
  2. Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2018 Apr;6(1):8-12 - PubMed
  3. Surv Ophthalmol. 1992 Nov-Dec;37(3):167-83 - PubMed
  4. Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2010 Aug;71(3):126-33 - PubMed
  5. J Neuroophthalmol. 2013 Jun;33(2):165-8 - PubMed
  6. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Mar 1;76(3):326-332 - PubMed
  7. Radiother Oncol. 2004 Aug;72(2):169-74 - PubMed
  8. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 15;75(4):1166-72 - PubMed
  9. World Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;118:e677-e686 - PubMed
  10. Eye Brain. 2018 Oct 24;10:85-99 - PubMed
  11. Neurosurgery. 2002 Oct;51(4):890-902; discussion 903-4 - PubMed
  12. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jun 1;56(2):537-43 - PubMed
  13. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):773-8 - PubMed
  14. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;31(6):455-461 - PubMed
  15. J Neurosurg. 2018 Sep 21;131(2):481-488 - PubMed
  16. Ophthalmology. 2002 May;109(5):890-9; discussion 899-900 - PubMed
  17. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 May;94(5):564-8 - PubMed
  18. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Oct;24(8):e106-12 - PubMed
  19. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Dec 1;48(5):1363-70 - PubMed
  20. J Neurosurg. 2004 Dec;101(6):951-9 - PubMed
  21. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct;103(10):1436-1440 - PubMed
  22. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Nov;86(11):1265-8 - PubMed
  23. J Clin Neurosci. 2008 Feb;15(2):95-100 - PubMed
  24. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):1268-77 - PubMed
  25. J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Oct;68:162-167 - PubMed
  26. J Neurosurg. 2004 Nov;101 Suppl 3:390-5 - PubMed
  27. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 May 1;80(1):185-92 - PubMed

Publication Types