Display options
Cite
El-Badri AM, Batool M, A A Mohamed I, et al. Antioxidative and Metabolic Contribution to Salinity Stress Responses in Two Rapeseed Cultivars during the Early Seedling Stage. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10(8)doi: 10.3390/antiox10081227.
El-Badri, A. M., Batool, M., A A Mohamed, I., Wang, Z., Khatab, A., Sherif, A., Ahmad, H., Khan, M. N., Hassan, H. M., Elrewainy, I. M., Kuai, J., Zhou, G., & Wang, B. (2021). Antioxidative and Metabolic Contribution to Salinity Stress Responses in Two Rapeseed Cultivars during the Early Seedling Stage. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 10(8), . https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10081227
El-Badri, Ali Mahmoud, et al. "Antioxidative and Metabolic Contribution to Salinity Stress Responses in Two Rapeseed Cultivars during the Early Seedling Stage." Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) vol. 10,8 (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10081227
El-Badri AM, Batool M, A A Mohamed I, Wang Z, Khatab A, Sherif A, Ahmad H, Khan MN, Hassan HM, Elrewainy IM, Kuai J, Zhou G, Wang B. Antioxidative and Metabolic Contribution to Salinity Stress Responses in Two Rapeseed Cultivars during the Early Seedling Stage. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 Jul 30;10(8). doi: 10.3390/antiox10081227. PMID: 34439475; PMCID: PMC8389040.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 Jul 30;10(8). doi: 10.3390/antiox10081227.

Antioxidative and Metabolic Contribution to Salinity Stress Responses in Two Rapeseed Cultivars during the Early Seedling Stage.

Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)

Ali Mahmoud El-Badri, Maria Batool, Ibrahim A A Mohamed, Zongkai Wang, Ahmed Khatab, Ahmed Sherif, Hasan Ahmad, Mohammad Nauman Khan, Hamada Mohamed Hassan, Ibrahim M Elrewainy, Jie Kuai, Guangsheng Zhou, Bo Wang

Affiliations

  1. MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
  2. Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza 12619, Egypt.
  3. Botany Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Fayoum 63514, Egypt.
  4. National Gene Bank, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza 12619, Egypt.

PMID: 34439475 PMCID: PMC8389040 DOI: 10.3390/antiox10081227

Abstract

Measuring metabolite patterns and antioxidant ability is vital to understanding the physiological and molecular responses of plants under salinity. A morphological analysis of five rapeseed cultivars showed that Yangyou 9 and Zhongshuang 11 were the most salt-tolerant and -sensitive, respectively. In Yangyou 9, the reactive oxygen species (ROS) level and malondialdehyde (MDA) content were minimized by the activation of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) for scavenging of over-accumulated ROS under salinity stress. Furthermore, Yangyou 9 showed a significantly higher positive correlation with photosynthetic pigments, osmolyte accumulation, and an adjusted Na

Keywords: Brassica napus; ROS; antioxidant enzymes; metabolites; osmolytes; salinity stress

References

  1. PLoS One. 2018 Sep 4;13(9):e0202175 - PubMed
  2. Plant Signal Behav. 2008 Mar;3(3):204-6 - PubMed
  3. Plant Sci. 2013 Jan;198:17-26 - PubMed
  4. Plants (Basel). 2020 Jun 30;9(7): - PubMed
  5. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65:225-57 - PubMed
  6. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2016 Sep;35(5):620-49 - PubMed
  7. Front Plant Sci. 2015 Oct 13;6:827 - PubMed
  8. J Chromatogr Sci. 2015 Nov-Dec;53(10):1631-8 - PubMed
  9. J Plant Physiol. 2016 Feb 1;191:63-72 - PubMed
  10. Nat Genet. 2014 Jul;46(7):714-21 - PubMed
  11. Sci China Life Sci. 2020 May;63(5):635-674 - PubMed
  12. Int J Genomics. 2014;2014:701596 - PubMed
  13. Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 10;7:842 - PubMed
  14. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020 Jul 29;9(8): - PubMed
  15. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020 Aug;18(8):1722-1735 - PubMed
  16. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(14):4089-103 - PubMed
  17. Mol Plant. 2013 Nov;6(6):1769-80 - PubMed
  18. Front Plant Sci. 2017 May 18;8:829 - PubMed
  19. Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 29;7:957 - PubMed
  20. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968 Apr;125(1):189-98 - PubMed
  21. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019 Feb;135:528-545 - PubMed
  22. Plants (Basel). 2020 Jan 02;9(1): - PubMed
  23. PLoS One. 2011 Feb 14;6(2):e17094 - PubMed
  24. Physiol Plant. 2015 Mar;153(3):477-91 - PubMed
  25. Proteomics. 2013 Jun;13(12-13):2046-62 - PubMed
  26. Phytochemistry. 2009 Mar;70(4):492-500 - PubMed
  27. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 15;7(1):8263 - PubMed
  28. Ann Bot. 2017 Apr 1;119(6):965-976 - PubMed
  29. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Apr 15;22(8): - PubMed
  30. Mol Biol Rep. 2011 Aug;38(6):3787-94 - PubMed
  31. Physiol Plant. 2017 Mar;159(3):290-312 - PubMed
  32. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015 Sep;94:130-43 - PubMed
  33. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020 Feb;147:31-42 - PubMed
  34. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Mar;22(6):4056-75 - PubMed
  35. Chemosphere. 2019 Jun;225:329-341 - PubMed
  36. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021 Jun 15;166:376-392 - PubMed
  37. Biomolecules. 2019 Oct 23;9(11): - PubMed
  38. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;30(3):161-75 - PubMed
  39. Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jan 09;7:2035 - PubMed
  40. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017 Jun;115:449-460 - PubMed
  41. Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 10;7:243 - PubMed
  42. Plant Signal Behav. 2015;10(11):e1049788 - PubMed
  43. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(3):415-24 - PubMed
  44. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014 Oct 1;559:75-90 - PubMed
  45. J Plant Physiol. 2014 May 15;171(9):708-14 - PubMed
  46. Biotechnol Lett. 2018 Aug;40(8):1159-1165 - PubMed
  47. Planta. 2019 Nov 27;251(1):3 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support