Display options
Share it on

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 19;21(1):840. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06869-4.

Organizing work in local service implementation: an ethnographic study of nurses' contributions and competencies in implementing a municipal acute ward.

BMC health services research

Helle Krone-Hjertstrøm, Bente Norbye, Birgit Abelsen, Aud Obstfelder

Affiliations

  1. Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. [email protected].
  2. Telemark Research Institute, Bø, Norway. [email protected].
  3. Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  4. The Department of Community Medicine, The National Centre of Rural Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  5. Department of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway.

PMID: 34412624 PMCID: PMC8375113 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06869-4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increased prevalence of chronic diseases and an ageing population challenge healthcare delivery, particularly hospital-based care. To address this issue, health policy aims to decentralize healthcare by transferring responsibility and introducing new services in primary healthcare. In-depth knowledge of associated implementation processes is crucial for health care managers, policymakers, and the health care personnel involved. In this article, we apply an ethnographic approach in a study of nurses' contributions to the implementation of a new inpatient service in an outpatient primary care emergency clinic and explore the competencies involved. The approach allowed us to explore the unexpressed yet significant effort, knowledge and competence of nurses that shaped the new service.

METHODS: The study combines observations (250 h) and several in situ interviews with healthcare personnel and individual in-depth interviews with nurses (n = 8) at the emergency clinic. In our analysis, we draw on a sociological perspective on healthcare work and organization that considers nursing a practice within the boundaries of clinical patient work, organizational structures, and managerial and professional requirements.

RESULTS: We describe the following three aspects of nurses' contributions to the implementation of the new service: (1) anticipating worst-case scenarios and taking responsibility for preventing them, (2) contributing coherence in patient care by ensuring that new and established procedures are interconnected, and (3) engaging in "invisible work". The nurses draw on their own experiences from their work as emergency nurses and knowledge of the local and regional contexts. They utilize their knowledge, competence, and organizing skills to influence the implementation process and ensure high-quality healthcare delivery in the extended service.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study illustrates that nurses' contributions are vital to coordinating and adjusting extended services. Organizing work, in addition to clinical work, is a crucial aspect of nursing work. It 'glues' the complex and varied components of the individual patient's services into coherent and holistic care trajectories. It is this organizing competence that nurses utilize when coordinating and adjusting extended services. We believe that nurses' organizing work is generally invaluable in implementing new services, although it has not been well emphasized in practice and research.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Keywords: Articulation work; Implementation; Nursing; Nursing work; Organizing work; Primary health care research; Qualitative research; Social organization of healthcare work

References

  1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 05;16(a):353 - PubMed
  2. BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Jun 22;14:87 - PubMed
  3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 14;16:11 - PubMed
  4. Health Care Women Int. 2007 Nov-Dec;28(10):888-908 - PubMed
  5. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2011 Jun;8(2):87-95 - PubMed
  6. J Nurs Manag. 2019 Jan;27(1):4-9 - PubMed
  7. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):675-80 - PubMed
  8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 17;13:222 - PubMed
  9. BMC Nurs. 2020 Jul 22;19:70 - PubMed
  10. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12 - PubMed
  11. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Feb;51(2):289-99 - PubMed
  12. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:36-42 - PubMed
  13. Fam Pract. 2016 Dec;33(6):709-714 - PubMed
  14. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb 13;15:60 - PubMed
  15. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 16;11:342 - PubMed
  16. JMIR Aging. 2018 Apr 23;1(1):e2 - PubMed
  17. Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Oct 27;6(4): - PubMed
  18. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Oct 3;2:46 - PubMed
  19. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413-33 - PubMed
  20. Appl Nurs Res. 2011 May;24(2):88-93 - PubMed
  21. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 03;15:535 - PubMed
  22. Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Jun;32(2):815-823 - PubMed
  23. Soc Sci Med. 2014 Oct;119:27-35 - PubMed
  24. Implement Sci. 2019 May 14;14(1):51 - PubMed
  25. Sociol Health Illn. 2014 Jul;36(6):807-22 - PubMed
  26. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(2):175-91 - PubMed
  27. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Feb;78:26-33 - PubMed
  28. BMC Nurs. 2011 Nov 08;10:23 - PubMed
  29. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:194-202 - PubMed
  30. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Feb;74(3):348-355 - PubMed
  31. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4(4):210-9 - PubMed
  32. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:203-11 - PubMed
  33. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629 - PubMed
  34. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Sep;28(17-18):3339-3352 - PubMed
  35. BMJ. 2001 Sep 15;323(7313):625-8 - PubMed
  36. Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 13;8:18 - PubMed
  37. J Health Organ Manag. 2018 May 21;32(3):358-373 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types