Display options
Share it on

J Pers Med. 2021 Jul 23;11(8). doi: 10.3390/jpm11080701.

Incidence and Time Point of Sepsis Detection as Related to Different Sepsis Definitions in Severely Burned Patients and Their Accompanying Time Course of Pro-Inflammatory Biomarkers.

Journal of personalized medicine

Pia Niggemann, Daniel Rittirsch, Philipp Karl Buehler, Riccardo Schweizer, Pietro Giovanoli, Theresia Reding, Rolf Graf, Jan Alexander Plock, Holger Jan Klein

Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Burn Center, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  2. Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  3. Regenerative and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Research Laboratory, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  4. Pancreas Research Laboratory, Department of Visceral Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  5. Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland.

PMID: 34442346 PMCID: PMC8401386 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11080701

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of sepsis in burn patients remains difficult for various reasons. One major problem is the definition of sepsis itself. Therefore, previous and current sepsis definitions are a matter of ongoing validation, but a well-defined consensus on which clinical and laboratory parameters to incorporate in such a definition is lacking. The aim of the present study was to compare the incidence and time-related occurrence of septic events according to different definitions as well as their accompanying time course of pro-inflammatory biomarkers.

METHODS: Across the first 14 days after admission, the incidence and time point of sepsis according to three different definitions (Sepsis-3, Sepsis American Burns Association [ABA] 2007, Sepsis Zurich Burn Center) were assessed on a daily basis in adult burn patients with total body surface area (TBSA) ≥15% admitted to the Zurich Burn Center between May 2015 and October 2018. In order to investigate how well daily drawn proinflammatory biomarkers (white blood cells (WBCs), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and novel pancreatic stone protein (PSP)) reflect the progression of sepsis depending on its type of definition, a longitudinal mixed model analysis was performed across the first 14 days for septic and non-septic patients. Additionally, the relative increase of biomarker levels 24, 48, and 72 h prior to a septic event was analyzed for each definition used.

RESULTS: In our cohort of 90 severely burned patients, Sepsis-3 identified 46 patients (51.1%) as septic, while ABA 2007 and the Zurich Burn Center definition counted 33 patients (36.7%) and 24 patients (26.6%), respectively. Sepsis-3 detected sepsis about 1 day earlier than Sepsis ABA 2007 (

CONCLUSIONS: Despite the ongoing dilemma of how to define sepsis in burn patients, a continually calculated SOFA score as used in Sepsis-3 is advantageous to early identify a patient's detrimental progression to sepsis. Inclusion of biomarkers, such as PSP, may help support the burn specialist's diagnosis of sepsis and could improve the diagnostic performance of current and future definitions in burn patients.

Keywords: burns; pro-inflammatory biomarkers; sepsis

References

  1. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60 - PubMed
  2. Biomark Med. 2019 Feb;13(2):135-145 - PubMed
  3. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10 - PubMed
  4. Ann Surg. 2020 Jan 14;: - PubMed
  5. Crit Care. 2021 Apr 20;25(1):151 - PubMed
  6. Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1250-6 - PubMed
  7. Am J Infect Control. 1988 Jun;16(3):128-40 - PubMed
  8. Chest. 2018 May;153(5):1169-1176 - PubMed
  9. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2018 Sep;30(3):423-430 - PubMed
  10. Burns. 2021 Mar;47(2):338-348 - PubMed
  11. J Burn Care Res. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):371-8 - PubMed
  12. Arch Surg. 2006 Nov;141(11):1132-40 - PubMed
  13. J Surg Res. 2002 Jun 15;105(2):136-44 - PubMed
  14. World J Surg. 2020 Sep;44(9):3000-3009 - PubMed
  15. PLoS Med. 2016 May 17;13(5):e1002022 - PubMed
  16. Crit Care. 2021 May 28;25(1):182 - PubMed
  17. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Sep 5;18(1):122 - PubMed
  18. J Burn Care Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):31-43 - PubMed
  19. Surgery. 2018 Dec;164(6):1241-1245 - PubMed
  20. Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R15 - PubMed
  21. Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul;46(7):e656-e662 - PubMed
  22. J Surg Res. 2004 May 15;118(2):122-35 - PubMed
  23. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Feb/Mar;19(2):168-175 - PubMed
  24. Scars Burn Heal. 2018 Aug 14;4:2059513118790658 - PubMed
  25. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2019 Dec 1;8(12):607-633 - PubMed
  26. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 05;6(7):ofz271 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support