Display options
Share it on

Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Nov;37(11):2015-2016. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1971185. Epub 2021 Sep 12.

Open Pharma recommendations for plain language summaries of peer-reviewed medical journal publications.

Current medical research and opinion

Adeline Rosenberg, Slávka Baróniková, Linda Feighery, William Gattrell, Rikke Egelund Olsen, Adam Watson, Tim Koder, Christopher Winchester

Affiliations

  1. Oxford PharmaGenesis Ltd, Oxford, UK.
  2. Galápagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium.
  3. UCB Pharma, Slough, UK.
  4. Ipsen, Milton Park, UK.
  5. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
  6. Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.

PMID: 34511020 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1971185

Abstract

Plain language summaries of peer-reviewed medical journal publications are a means of sharing research with a broad range of audiences and may improve the transparency, accountability, accessibility, discoverability, and inclusivity of medical research. There is currently an ongoing, industry-wide effort to establish consensus on plain language summaries, and initiatives are already in place that provide detailed guidance on plain language best practice, co-creation methods, patient-focused content, graphic and digital considerations, and publisher-specific guidelines. However, there remains a need for a foundational set of recommendations that complement existing initiatives to outline the minimum steps needed to develop discoverable, plain language summaries that are trustworthy, credible, and of high quality. Here, we present the Open Pharma recommendations for plain language summaries of peer-reviewed medical journal publications. These recommendations were initially developed by the Open Pharma Accessibility workstream and were extensively reviewed and refined during an expert roundtable and a focused, public consultation. Open Pharma is a multi-sponsor collaboration of pharmaceutical companies, non-pharmaceutical funders, publishers, patients, academics, regulators, editors, and societies seeking to identify and drive positive changes in the publishing of pharmaceutical company-funded research. We recommend that plain language summaries should be in the style of an abstract, free of technical jargon, unbiased, non-promotional, peer reviewed, and easily accessed. Plain language summaries should also meet the technical requirements to be indexed in directories such as PubMed. Ultimately, these recommendations are intended to be a concise outline of a minimum standard that provides top-line guidance on plain language summaries for authors, medical writers, publishers, and research funders.

Keywords: Plain language summary; accessibility; discoverability; inclusivity pharmaceutical research; public engagement

MeSH terms

Publication Types