Display options
Cite
Frøen JF, Bianchi A, Moller AB, et al. FIGO good practice recommendations on the importance of registry data for monitoring rates and health systems performance in prevention and management of preterm birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;155(1):5-7doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13847.
Frøen, J. F., Bianchi, A., Moller, A. B., Jacobsson, B. (2021). FIGO good practice recommendations on the importance of registry data for monitoring rates and health systems performance in prevention and management of preterm birth. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 155(1), 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13847
Frøen, J Frederik, et al. "FIGO good practice recommendations on the importance of registry data for monitoring rates and health systems performance in prevention and management of preterm birth." International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics vol. 155,1 (2021): 5-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13847
Frøen JF, Bianchi A, Moller AB, Jacobsson B. FIGO good practice recommendations on the importance of registry data for monitoring rates and health systems performance in prevention and management of preterm birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Oct;155(1):5-7. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13847. PMID: 34520059.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Oct;155(1):5-7. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13847.

FIGO good practice recommendations on the importance of registry data for monitoring rates and health systems performance in prevention and management of preterm birth.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics

J Frederik Frøen, Ana Bianchi, Ann-Beth Moller, Bo Jacobsson,

Affiliations

  1. Global Health Cluster, Division for Health Serrvices, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  2. Perinatal Department, Pereira Rossell Hospital, and University Hospital, Montevideo, Uruguay.
  3. School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  6. Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Domain of Health Data and Digitalization, Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

PMID: 34520059 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13847

Abstract

FIGO calls for strengthening of health information systems for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health services, co-designed with users, to ensure the timely accessibility of actionable high-quality data for all stakeholders engaged in preventing and managing preterm birth consequences. FIGO calls for strengthening of investments and capacity for implementing digital registries and the continuity of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health services in line with WHO recommendations, and strengthening of the science of implementation and use of registries-from local quality improvement to big data exploration.

© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Keywords: health systems strengthening; high-quality data; preterm birth; prevention; registry

References

  1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. United Nations; 2015. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (Accessed July 28, 2021). - PubMed
  2. World Health Organization. The Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescent’s Health (2016-2030): Survive, Thrive, Transform. World Health Organization; 2015. https://www.who.int/pmnch/media/events/2015/gs_pager.pdf (Accessed July 28, 2021). - PubMed
  3. Benova L, Tunçalp Ö, Moran AC, Campbell OMR. Not just a number: examining coverage and content of antenatal care in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(2):e000779. - PubMed
  4. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(11):e1196-e1252. - PubMed
  5. World Health Organization. WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening: evidence and recommendations. World Health Organization; 2019. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/311980 (Accessed July 28, 2021). - PubMed
  6. Frøen JF, Myhre SL, Frost MJ, et al. eRegistries: electronic registries for maternal and child health. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:11. - PubMed
  7. Mehl G, Tunçalp Ö, Ratanaprayul N, et al. WHO SMART guidelines: optimising country-level use of guideline recommendations in the digital age. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3(4):e213-e216. - PubMed
  8. DHIS2 [webpage] www.dhis2.org. Accessed July 28, 2021. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types