Display options
Share it on

Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep 22; doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08233-w. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

Association of iron rim lesions with brain and cervical cord volume in relapsing multiple sclerosis.

European radiology

Claudia E Weber, Julia Krämer, Matthias Wittayer, Johannes Gregori, Sigurd Randoll, Florian Weiler, Stefan Heldmann, Christina Roßmanith, Michael Platten, Achim Gass, Philipp Eisele

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim and Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1 - 3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
  2. Department of Neurology With Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1; Gebäude A1, Westturm, Ebene 5, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  3. Mediri GmbH, Eppelheimer Straße 113, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
  4. Fraunhofer MEVIS, Am Fallturm 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
  5. Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim and Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1 - 3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. [email protected].

PMID: 34549326 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08233-w

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In multiple sclerosis (MS), iron rim lesions (IRLs) are indicators of chronic low-grade inflammation and ongoing tissue destruction. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of IRLs with clinical measures and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers, in particular brain and cervical cord volume.

METHODS: Clinical and MRI parameters from 102 relapsing MS patients (no relapses for at least 6 months, no contrast-enhancing lesions) were included; follow-up data obtained after 12 months was available in 49 patients. IRLs were identified on susceptibility-weighted images (SWIs). In addition to standard brain and spinal cord MRI parameters, normalised cross-sectional area (nCSA) of the upper cervical cord was calculated.

RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients had at least one IRL on SWI MRI. At baseline, patients with IRLs had higher EDSS scores, higher lesion loads (brain and spinal cord), and lower cortical grey matter volumes and a lower nCSA. At follow-up, brain atrophy rates were higher in patients with IRLs. IRLs correlated spatially with T1-hypointense lesions.

CONCLUSIONS: Relapsing MS patients with IRLs showed more aggressive MRI disease characteristics in both the cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

KEY POINTS: • Multiple sclerosis patients with iron rim lesions had higher EDSS scores, higher brain and spinal cord lesion loads, lower cortical grey matter volumes, and a lower normalised cross-sectional area of the upper cervical spinal cord. • Iron rim lesions are a new lesion descriptor obtained from susceptibility-weighted MRI. Our data suggests that further exploration of this lesion characteristic in regard to a poorer prognosis in multiple sclerosis patients is warranted.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple sclerosis; Spinal cord

References

  1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302 - PubMed
  2. Barkhof F (2002) The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited. Curr Opin Neurol 15:239–245 - PubMed
  3. Elliott C, Wolinsky JS, Hauser SL et al (2019) Slowly expanding/evolving lesions as a magnetic resonance imaging marker of chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions. Mult Scler 25:1915–1925 - PubMed
  4. Dal-Bianco A, Grabner G, Kronnerwetter C et al (2017) Slow expansion of multiple sclerosis iron rim lesions: pathology and 7 T magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Neuropathol 133:25–42 - PubMed
  5. Elliott C, Belachew S, Wolinsky JS et al (2019) Chronic white matter lesion activity predicts clinical progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 142:2787–2799 - PubMed
  6. Absinta M, Sati P, Masuzzo F et al (2019) Association of chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions with disability in vivo. JAMA Neurol 76:1474–1483 - PubMed
  7. Absinta M, Sati P, Schindler M et al (2016) Persistent 7-Tesla phase rim predicts poor outcome in new multiple sclerosis patient lesions. J Clin Invest 126:2597–2609 - PubMed
  8. Weber CE, Kraemer M, Dabringhaus A et al (2021) Venous diameter changes in chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions. J Neuroimaging 31:394–400 - PubMed
  9. Bagnato F, Hametner S, Yao B et al (2011) Tracking iron in multiple sclerosis: a combined imaging and histopathological study at 7 Tesla. Brain 134:3602–3615 - PubMed
  10. Dal-Bianco A, Grabner G, Kronnerwetter C et al (2021) Long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis iron rim lesions in 7 T MRI. Brain 144:833–847 - PubMed
  11. Gass A, Rocca MA, Agosta F et al (2015) MRI monitoring of pathological changes in the spinal cord in patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 14:443–454 - PubMed
  12. Lin X, Tench CR, Turner B, Blumhardt LD, Constantinescu CS (2003) Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis over four years: application of a reproducible automated technique in monitoring disease progression in a cohort of the interferon beta-1a (Rebif) treatment trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:1090–1094 - PubMed
  13. Rocca MA, Valsasina P, Meani A et al (2019) Clinically relevant cranio-caudal patterns of cervical cord atrophy evolution in MS. Neurology 93:e1852–e1866 - PubMed
  14. Bonacchi R, Pagani E, Meani A et al (2020) Clinical relevance of multiparametric MRI assessment of cervical cord damage in multiple sclerosis. Radiology 296:605–615 - PubMed
  15. Lukas C, Knol DL, Sombekke MH et al (2015) Cervical spinal cord volume loss is related to clinical disability progression in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86:410–418 - PubMed
  16. Lukas C, Sombekke MH, Bellenberg B et al (2013) Relevance of spinal cord abnormalities to clinical disability in multiple sclerosis: MR imaging findings in a large cohort of patients. Radiology 269:542–552 - PubMed
  17. Moccia M, Ruggieri S, Ianniello A, Toosy A, Pozzilli C, Ciccarelli O (2019) Advances in spinal cord imaging in multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756286419840593.eCollection2019 - PubMed
  18. Kappos L, Wolinsky JS, Giovannoni G et al (2020) Contribution of relapse-independent progression vs relapse-associated worsening to overall confirmed disability accumulation in typical relapsing multiple sclerosis in a pooled analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol 77:1132–1140 - PubMed
  19. Lorscheider J, Buzzard K, Jokubaitis V et al (2016) Defining secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 139:2395–2405 - PubMed
  20. Weiler F, Hallmann MF, Schwier M et al (2017) Fully automated detection, segmentation and quantification of mean cross-sectional area of the spinal cord. Mult Scler 23(S3):149–150 - PubMed
  21. Gregori J, Cornelissen C, Hoffmann S et al (2018) Feasibility of fully automated atrophy measurement of the upper cervical spinal cord for group analyses and patient- individual diagnosis support in MS. Mult Scler 24(S2):623–624 - PubMed
  22. Eden D, Gros C, Badji A et al (2019) Spatial distribution of multiple sclerosis lesions in the cervical spinal cord. Brain 142:633–646 - PubMed
  23. De Leener B, Fonov VS, Collins DL, Callot V, Stikov N, Cohen-Adad J (2018) PAM50: unbiased multimodal template of the brainstem and spinal cord aligned with the ICBM152 space. Neuroimage 165:170–179 - PubMed
  24. De Leener B, Levy S, Dupont SM et al (2017) SCT: Spinal Cord Toolbox, an open-source software for processing spinal cord MRI data. Neuroimage 145:24–43 - PubMed
  25. Smith SM, De Stefano N, Jenkinson M, Matthews PM (2001) Normalized accurate measurement of longitudinal brain change. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:466–475 - PubMed
  26. Smith SM, Zhang Y, Jenkinson M et al (2002) Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis. Neuroimage 17:479–489 - PubMed
  27. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW et al (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23(Suppl 1):S208-219 - PubMed
  28. Clarke MA, Pareto D, Pessini-Ferreira L et al (2020) Value of 3T susceptibility-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41:1001–1008 - PubMed
  29. Frischer JM, Weigand SD, Guo Y et al (2015) Clinical and pathological insights into the dynamic nature of the white matter multiple sclerosis plaque. Ann Neurol 78:710–721 - PubMed
  30. Luchetti S, Fransen NL, van Eden CG, Ramaglia V, Mason M, Huitinga I (2018) Progressive multiple sclerosis patients show substantial lesion activity that correlates with clinical disease severity and sex: a retrospective autopsy cohort analysis. Acta Neuropathol 135:511–528 - PubMed
  31. Maggi P, Sati P, Nair G et al (2020) Paramagnetic rim lesions are specific to multiple sclerosis: an international multicenter 3T MRI study. Ann Neurol 88:1034–1042 - PubMed
  32. Kutzelnigg A, Lucchinetti CF, Stadelmann C et al (2005) Cortical demyelination and diffuse white matter injury in multiple sclerosis. Brain 128:2705–2712 - PubMed
  33. Preziosa P, Pagani E, Moiola L, Rodegher M, Filippi M, Rocca MA (2020) Occurrence and microstructural features of slowly expanding lesions on fingolimod or natalizumab treatment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458520969105 - PubMed
  34. van Waesberghe JH, Kamphorst W, De Groot CJ et al (1999) Axonal loss in multiple sclerosis lesions: magnetic resonance imaging insights into substrates of disability. Ann Neurol 46:747–754 - PubMed
  35. Kearney H, Altmann DR, Samson RS et al (2015) Cervical cord lesion load is associated with disability independently from atrophy in MS. Neurology 84:367–373 - PubMed
  36. Enzinger C, Barkhof F, Ciccarelli O et al (2015) Nonconventional MRI and microstructural cerebral changes in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 11:676–686 - PubMed

Publication Types