Display options
Cite
Ewuoso C. Patient confidentiality, the duty to protect, and psychotherapeutic care: perspectives from the philosophy of ubuntu. Theor Med Bioeth. 2021;42(1):41-59doi: 10.1007/s11017-021-09545-0.
Ewuoso, C. (2021). Patient confidentiality, the duty to protect, and psychotherapeutic care: perspectives from the philosophy of ubuntu. Theoretical medicine and bioethics, 42(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-021-09545-0
Ewuoso, Cornelius. "Patient confidentiality, the duty to protect, and psychotherapeutic care: perspectives from the philosophy of ubuntu." Theoretical medicine and bioethics vol. 42,1 (2021): 41-59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-021-09545-0
Ewuoso C. Patient confidentiality, the duty to protect, and psychotherapeutic care: perspectives from the philosophy of ubuntu. Theor Med Bioeth. 2021 Apr;42(1):41-59. doi: 10.1007/s11017-021-09545-0. Epub 2021 Sep 15. PMID: 34523034.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Theor Med Bioeth. 2021 Apr;42(1):41-59. doi: 10.1007/s11017-021-09545-0. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

Patient confidentiality, the duty to protect, and psychotherapeutic care: perspectives from the philosophy of ubuntu.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics

Cornelius Ewuoso

Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa. [email protected].

PMID: 34523034 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-021-09545-0

Abstract

This paper demonstrates how ubuntu relational philosophy may be used to ground beneficial coercive care without necessarily violating a patient's dignity. Specifically, it argues that ubuntu philosophy is a useful theory for developing necessary conditions for determining a patient's potential dangerousness; setting reasonable limits to the duty to protect; balancing the long-term good of providing unimpeded therapy for patients who need it with the short-term good of protecting at-risk parties; and advancing a framework for future case law and appropriate regulations in the care of psychotherapy patients. Issues regarding the decision to breach medical confidentiality in psychotherapeutic care are ultimately reserved for the courts. Professional assessment might be an important first step in this process, and court rulings govern most aspects of this assessment. However, current case law, especially in the United States, places an unreasonable expectation on psychotherapists to protect all at-risk parties or foresee that a patient intends to follow through on said threats. It has largely failed to guarantee psychotherapy patients unlimited access to care, while potentially inhibiting future honest communication between patients and health professionals and endangering the safety of others. Of these decisions, the two most prominent are the 1976 Tarasoff decision and the 2016 Volk decision. This paper argues for the possibility of grounding good laws in ubuntu African philosophy in a way that protects others from harm and ensures unimpeded access to care without necessarily breaching medical confidentiality.

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Keywords: Duty to protect; Mental health care; Relational ethics; Tarasoff decision; Ubuntu philosophy; Volk decision

References

  1. Persaud, Albert, and David Hewitt. 2001. European convention on human rights: Effects on psychiatric care. Nursing Standard 15(44): 33–37. - PubMed
  2. Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1 (1996). - PubMed
  3. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), Pub.L. No. 104–191, 110 Stat. 1936 (1996). - PubMed
  4. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512 (2016). - PubMed
  5. Bersoff, Donald N. 2014. Protecting victims of violent patients while protecting confidentiality. American Psychologist 69: 461–467. - PubMed
  6. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425 (1976), 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (1976). - PubMed
  7. Cal. Civ. Code § 43.92 (2013). - PubMed
  8. American Psychological Association. 1953. Ethical standards of psychologists: A summary of ethical principles. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. - PubMed
  9. Boynton v. Burglass, 590 So. 2d 446 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991). - PubMed
  10. Agyapong, V.I.O., R. Kirrane, and R. Bangaru. 2009. Medical confidentiality versus disclosure: Ethical and legal dilemmas. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 16: 93–96. - PubMed
  11. Osman v. United Kingdom, 1998-VIII Eur. Ct. H.R. 3124. - PubMed
  12. Kadooka, Yasuhiro, Taketoshi Okita, and Atsushi Asai. 2016. Ethical obligations in the face of dilemmas concerning patient privacy and public interests: The Sasebo schoolgirl murder case. Bioethics 30: 520–527. - PubMed
  13. Knoll, James L. 2015. The psychiatrist’s duty to protect. CNS Spectrums 20: 215–222. - PubMed
  14. Elger, Bernice Simone, Violet Handtke, and Tenzin Wangmo. 2015. Paternalistic breaches of confidentiality in prison: Mental health professionals’ attitudes and justifications. Journal of Medical Ethics 41: 496–500. - PubMed
  15. Anfang, Stuart A., and Paul S. Appelbaum. 1996. Twenty years after Tarasoff: Reviewing the duty to protect. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 4: 67–76. - PubMed
  16. Monahan, John, Henry J. Steadman, Eric Silver, Paul S. Appelbaum, Pamela Clark Robbins, Edward P. Mulvey, Loren H. Roth, Thomas Grisso, and Steven Banks. 2001. Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. - PubMed
  17. Bardoni v. Kim, 390 N.W.2d 218 (Mich. App. 1986). - PubMed
  18. Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 497 F. Supp. 185, 190 (D. Neb. 1980). - PubMed
  19. Volk v. DeMeerleer, 386 P.3d 254 (Wash. 2016). - PubMed
  20. Piel, Jennifer L., and Rejoice Opara. 2018. Does Volk v DeMeerleer conflict with the AMA Code of Medical Ethics on breaching patient confidentiality to protect third parties? AMA Journal of Ethics 20: 10–18. - PubMed
  21. Boron Oil Co. v. Downie, 873 F.2d 67 (4th Cir. 1989). - PubMed
  22. Kipnis, Kenneth. 2007. Medical confidentiality. In The Blackwell guide to medical ethics, ed. Rosamond Rhodes, Leslie P. Francis, and Anita Silvers, 104–127. Malden, MA: Blackwell. - PubMed
  23. Ewuoso, Cornelius Olukunle. 2018. Beneficial coercion in psychiatric care: Insights from African ethico-cultural system. Developing World Bioethics 18: 91–97. - PubMed
  24. Caplan, Arthur. 2008. Denying autonomy in order to create it: The paradox of forcing treatment upon addicts. Addiction 103: 1919–1921. - PubMed
  25. Stone, Alan A. 1975. Mental health and law: A system in transition. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health. - PubMed
  26. Ewuoso, C., and S. Hall. 2019. Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 12: 93–103. - PubMed
  27. Ndebele, Paul, Joseph Mfutso-Bengo, and Francis Masiye. 2008. HIV/AIDS reduces the relevance of the principle of individual medical confidentiality among the Bantu people of Southern Africa. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29: 331–340. - PubMed
  28. Nurse, Derek. 2006. Bantu languages. In Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd ed, ed. Keith Brown, vol. 1, 679–685. Oxford: Elsevier. - PubMed
  29. Metz, Thaddeus. 2007. Toward an African moral theory. Journal of Political Philosophy 15: 321–341. - PubMed
  30. Tutu, Desmond. 1999. No future without forgiveness. London: Random House. - PubMed
  31. Ramose, Mogobe B. 2002. The philosophy of ubuntu and ubuntu as a philosophy. In Philosophy from Africa: A text with readings, ed. P.H. Coetzee and A.P.J. Roux, 230–237. Oxford: Oxford University Press. - PubMed
  32. Gade, Christian B.N. 2012. What is ubuntu? Different interpretations among South Africans of African descent. South African Journal of Philosophy 31: 484–503. - PubMed
  33. Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph, and Francis Masiye. 2011. Toward an African Ubuntuology/uMunthuology: Bioethics in Malawi in the context of globalization. In Bioethics around the globe, ed. Catherine Myser, 134–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press. - PubMed
  34. Dreyer, Jaco S. 2015. Ubuntu: A practical theological perspective. International Journal of Practical Theology 19: 189–209. - PubMed
  35. Metz, Thaddeus. 2012. An African theory of moral status: A relational alternative to individualism and holism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15: 387–402. - PubMed
  36. Metz, Thaddeus. 2010. Human dignity, capital punishment, and an African moral theory: Toward a new philosophy of human rights. Journal of Human Rights 9: 81–99. - PubMed
  37. Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. - PubMed
  38. Gavaghan, Colin. 2007. A Tarasoff for Europe? A European Human Rights perspective on the duty to protect. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 30: 255–267. - PubMed
  39. Gellerman, David M., and Robert Suddath. 2005. Violent fantasy, dangerousness, and the duty to warn and protect. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 33: 484–495. - PubMed
  40. Sen, Amartya. 1992. Inequality reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. - PubMed
  41. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge: Belknap Press. - PubMed
  42. Robeyns, Ingrid, and Morten Fibieger Byskov. 2021. The capability approach. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2021 ed, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/capability-approach . - PubMed
  43. Hoffmann, Nimi, and Thaddeus Metz. 2017. What can the capabilities approach learn from an ubuntu ethic? A relational approach to development theory. World Development 97: 153–164. - PubMed
  44. Kant, Immanuel. 1785. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Riga: Hartknoch. - PubMed
  45. Dolamo, Ramathate. 2013. Botho/Ubuntu: The heart of African ethics. Scriptura 112: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7833/112-0-781-10 . - PubMed
  46. Metz, Thaddeus. 2011. Ubuntu as a moral theory and human rights in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal 11: 532–559. - PubMed
  47. Bloch, Sidney, and Peter Reddaway. 1977. Russia’s political hospitals: The abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union. London: Victor Gollancz. - PubMed
  48. Van Voren, Robert. 2010. Abuse of psychiatry for political purposes in the USSR: A case-study and personal account of the efforts to bring them to an end. In Ethics in psychiatry: European contributions, ed. Hanfried Helmchen and Norman Sartorius, 489–508. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8721-8_29 . - PubMed
  49. Tims, Frank M., Nancy Jainchill, and George De Leon. 1994. Therapeutic communities and treatment research. In Therapeutic community: Advances in research and application, ed. Frank M. Tims, George De Leon, and Nancy Jainchill, 1–15. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. - PubMed

Publication Types