Display options
Share it on

Mem Cognit. 2021 Oct 06; doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01237-3. Epub 2021 Oct 06.

Revisiting the influence of offloading memory on free recall.

Memory & cognition

Megan O Kelly, Evan F Risko

Affiliations

  1. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. [email protected].
  2. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

PMID: 34617131 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01237-3

Abstract

Relying on external memory aids is a common memory strategy that has long allowed us to "remember" vast amounts of information more reliably than with our internal memory alone. However, recent work has provided evidence consistent with the idea that offloading memory demands encourages a reduced engagement in intentional or top-down memory strategies/efforts, leading to lower memory performance in general. Evidence for this view comes from results demonstrating a reduced primacy effect but intact recency and isolation effects when individuals could offload memory demands (but had to unexpectedly rely on their internal memory at test). In the present investigation, we attempt a replication of these critical results, given some inconsistencies in the findings between studies. In addition, we extend the examination of offloading's impact on memory via examining individual differences in reliance on the external store (when available) and different strategies for the use of that store. Results of the replication are generally consistent with previous research. An individual differences analysis yielded results consistent with the notion that increased reliance on an external store can compromise internal/biological memory in the absence of that store. Finally, a verbal model of offloading memory demands within a framework of effort and study time allocation is presented. Together, the results both reinforce extant research and extend it in new directions.

© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Keywords: Memory; Offloading; Recall

References

  1. Abdi, H. (2007). Bonferroni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. In J. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (pp. 284–290). SAGE Publications. - PubMed
  2. Ackerman, R. (2014). The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1349–1368. - PubMed
  3. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keeping it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. - PubMed
  4. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. - PubMed
  5. Brown, V. A. (2021). An introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–19. - PubMed
  6. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (1998). What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. Acta Psychologica, 98, 37–56. - PubMed
  7. Dunlosky, J., Hunt, R., & Clark, E. (2000). Is perceptual salience needed in explanations of the isolation effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 649–657. - PubMed
  8. Dunn, T. L., Lutes, D. J. C., & Risko, E. F. (2016). Metacognitive evaluation in the avoidance of demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(9), 1372–1387. - PubMed
  9. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630 - PubMed
  10. Eskritt, M, & Ma, S. (2014). Intentional-forgetting: Note-taking as a naturalistic example. Memory & Cognition, 42, 237–246. - PubMed
  11. Fabiani, M., & Donchin, E. (1995). Encoding processes and memory organization: A model of the Von Restorff effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 224–240. - PubMed
  12. Fischler, I., Rundus, D., & Atkinson, R. C. (1970). Effects of overt rehearsal procedures on free recall. Psychonomic Science, 19(4), 249–250. - PubMed
  13. Graf, P., & Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 23, 553–568. - PubMed
  14. Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 923–941. - PubMed
  15. Kelly, M. O., & Risko, E. F. (2019a). Offloading memory: Serial position effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 1347–1353 - PubMed
  16. Kelly, M. O., & Risko, E. F. (2019b). The isolation effect when offloading memory. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(4), 471–480 - PubMed
  17. Köhler, W., & von Restorff, H. (1995). An analysis of the processes in the trace field (A. Dorsch, Trans.). (Original work published 1933). http://www.utsa.edu/mind/von_restorff_translation.htm - PubMed
  18. Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 665–682. - PubMed
  19. Lawrence, M. A. (2016). ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments (R Package Version 4.4-0) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ez/index.html - PubMed
  20. Lu, X., Kelly, M. O., & Risko, E. F. (2020). Offloading information to an external store increases false recall. Cognition, 205, Article 104428. - PubMed
  21. Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2005). A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 463–477. - PubMed
  22. Navarro, D. J. (2015). Learning statistics with R: A tutorial for psychology students and other beginners (Version 0.5) University of Adelaide. https://learningstatisticswithr.com/lsr-0.6.pdf - PubMed
  23. R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/ . - PubMed
  24. Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Science, 20(9), 676–688. - PubMed
  25. Risko, E. F., Kelly, M. O., Patel, P., & Gaspar, C. (2019). Offloading memory leaves us vulnerable to memory manipulation. Cognition, 191, Article 103954. - PubMed
  26. Rundus, D. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89(1), 63–77. - PubMed
  27. Singmann, H., & Kellen, D. (2019). An introduction to mixed models for experimental psychology. In D. H. Spieler & E. Schumacher (Eds.), New methods in cognitive psychology (pp. 4–31). Psychology Press. - PubMed
  28. Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips, Science, 333(6043), 776–778. - PubMed
  29. Tan, L., & Ward, G. (2008). Rehearsal in immediate serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 535–542. - PubMed
  30. Undorf, M., & Ackerman, R. (2017). The puzzle of study time allocation for the most challenging items. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 2003–2011. - PubMed
  31. von Restorff, H. (1933). Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildung im Spurenfeld [On the effects of the formation of a structure in the trace field]. Psychologische Forschung, 18, 299–342. - PubMed
  32. Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley. - PubMed

Publication Types