Display options
Share it on

Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 30;11(1):19438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98912-x.

Performance of a scalable RNA extraction-free transcriptome profiling method for adherent cultured human cells.

Scientific reports

Shreya Ghimire, Carley G Stewart, Andrew L Thurman, Alejandro A Pezzulo

Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 34593905 PMCID: PMC8484438 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98912-x

Abstract

RNA sequencing enables high-content/high-complexity measurements in small molecule screens. Whereas the costs of DNA sequencing and RNA-seq library preparation have decreased consistently, RNA extraction remains a significant bottleneck to scalability. We evaluate the performance of a bulk RNA-seq library prep protocol optimized for analysis of many samples of adherent cultured cells in parallel. We combined a low-cost direct lysis buffer compatible with cDNA synthesis (in-lysate cDNA synthesis) with Smart-3SEQ and examine the effects of calmidazolium and fludrocortisone-induced perturbation of primary human dermal fibroblasts. We compared this method to normalized purified RNA inputs from matching samples followed by Smart-3SEQ or Illumina TruSeq library prep. Our results show the minimal effect of RNA loading normalization on data quality, measurement of gene expression patterns, and generation of differentially expressed gene lists. We found that in-lysate cDNA synthesis combined with Smart-3SEQ RNA-seq library prep generated high-quality data with similar ranked DEG lists when compared to library prep with extracted RNA or with Illumina TruSeq. Our data show that small molecule screens or experiments based on many perturbations quantified with RNA-seq are feasible at low reagent and time costs.

© 2021. The Author(s).

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 05;5:12859 - PubMed
  2. Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 1;30(7):923-30 - PubMed
  3. Sci Rep. 2014 Apr 11;4:4659 - PubMed
  4. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550 - PubMed
  5. Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):907-915 - PubMed
  6. Front Oncol. 2013 Nov 07;3:274 - PubMed
  7. J Vis Exp. 2013 Jul 07;(77):e3779 - PubMed
  8. Vaccine. 2015 Dec 16;33(51):7254-7261 - PubMed
  9. Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 18;8(1):10885 - PubMed
  10. Anal Biochem. 2012 Aug 15;427(2):178-86 - PubMed
  11. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 08;10(9):e0137782 - PubMed
  12. Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 17;9(1):4307 - PubMed
  13. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Feb 03;10:48 - PubMed
  14. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2015 Nov 15;9(Suppl 1):29-46 - PubMed
  15. Bioinformatics. 2012 Nov 1;28(21):2782-8 - PubMed
  16. Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Nov;20(11):631-656 - PubMed
  17. Bioinformatics. 2005 Oct 15;21(20):3940-1 - PubMed
  18. Cell Syst. 2015 Dec 23;1(6):417-425 - PubMed
  19. Brief Bioinform. 2019 Mar 22;20(2):482-491 - PubMed
  20. Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Jan;10(1):57-63 - PubMed
  21. Bioinformatics. 2016 Oct 1;32(19):3047-8 - PubMed
  22. Nat Commun. 2017 Jul 24;8(1):105 - PubMed
  23. Genome Res. 2019 Nov;29(11):1816-1825 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support