Display options
Cite
Stanworth S, Callum J. The Paradox of Choice in Hemostatic Resuscitation: Still More Options Than Evidence, But a Good Start. Transfus Med Rev. 2021;35(4):71-72doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.08.005.
Stanworth, S., & Callum, J. (2021). The Paradox of Choice in Hemostatic Resuscitation: Still More Options Than Evidence, But a Good Start. Transfusion medicine reviews, 35(4), 71-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.08.005
Stanworth, Simon, and Callum, Jeannie. "The Paradox of Choice in Hemostatic Resuscitation: Still More Options Than Evidence, But a Good Start." Transfusion medicine reviews vol. 35,4 (2021): 71-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.08.005
Stanworth S, Callum J. The Paradox of Choice in Hemostatic Resuscitation: Still More Options Than Evidence, But a Good Start. Transfus Med Rev. 2021 Oct;35(4):71-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.08.005. Epub 2021 Sep 08. PMID: 34598875.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Transfus Med Rev. 2021 Oct;35(4):71-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.08.005. Epub 2021 Sep 08.

The Paradox of Choice in Hemostatic Resuscitation: Still More Options Than Evidence, But a Good Start.

Transfusion medicine reviews

Simon Stanworth, Jeannie Callum

Affiliations

  1. Transfusion Medicine, NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom; Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  2. Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: [email protected].

PMID: 34598875 DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.08.005

[No abstract available.]

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest Dr. Jeannie Callum has recieved research support from Canadian Blood Services and Octapharma.

Publication Types