Display options
Share it on

Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;11(1):20838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00313-7.

Modulation of the N13 component of the somatosensory evoked potentials in an experimental model of central sensitization in humans.

Scientific reports

A Di Lionardo, G Di Stefano, C Leone, G Di Pietro, E Sgro, E Malara, C Cosentino, C Mollica, A J Blockeel, O Caspani, L Garcia-Larrea, A Mouraux, R D Treede, K G Phillips, M Valeriani, Andrea Truini

Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Neuroscience, University Sapienza, Viale Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy.
  2. Department of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
  3. School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  4. Department of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  5. Lyon Neurosciences Center Research Unit Inserm U 1028, Pierre Wertheimer Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
  6. Pain Center, Pierre Wertheimer Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
  7. UCLouvain, Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Brussels, Belgium.
  8. Neuroscience Next Generation Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Innovation Center, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
  9. Department of Neuroscience, Headache Center, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  10. Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  11. Department of Human Neuroscience, University Sapienza, Viale Università 30, 00185, Rome, Italy. [email protected].

PMID: 34675309 PMCID: PMC8531029 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00313-7

Abstract

The N13 component of somatosensory evoked potential (N13 SEP) represents the segmental response of dorsal horn neurons. In this neurophysiological study, we aimed to verify whether N13 SEP might reflect excitability changes of dorsal horn neurons during central sensitization. In 22 healthy participants, we investigated how central sensitization induced by application of topical capsaicin to the ulnar nerve territory of the hand dorsum modulated N13 SEP elicited by ulnar nerve stimulation. Using a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover design, we also tested whether pregabalin, an analgesic drug with proven efficacy on the dorsal horn, influenced capsaicin-induced N13 SEP modulation. Topical application of capsaicin produced an area of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia, a sign of central sensitization, and increased the N13 SEP amplitude but not the peripheral N9 nor the cortical N20-P25 amplitude. This increase in N13 SEP amplitude paralleled the mechanical hyperalgesia and persisted for 120 min. Pregabalin prevented the N13 SEP modulation associated with capsaicin-induced central sensitization, whereas capsaicin application still increased N13 SEP amplitude in the placebo treatment session. Our neurophysiological study showed that capsaicin application specifically modulates N13 SEP and that this modulation is prevented by pregabalin, thus suggesting that N13 SEP may reflect changes in dorsal horn excitability and represent a useful biomarker of central sensitization in human studies.

© 2021. The Author(s).

References

  1. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Dec;96(6):3551-5 - PubMed
  2. Am J Physiol. 1983 Dec;245(6):R751-4 - PubMed
  3. Brain. 1984 Dec;107 ( Pt 4):1179-88 - PubMed
  4. J Neurophysiol. 1998 Dec;80(6):2801-10 - PubMed
  5. Nature. 1983 Dec 15-21;306(5944):686-8 - PubMed
  6. Anesthesiology. 2002 Jul;97(1):102-7 - PubMed
  7. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Oct 28;17:303 - PubMed
  8. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 May;15(3):227-34 - PubMed
  9. J Neurophysiol. 1993 Mar;69(3):703-16 - PubMed
  10. Pain. 2008 Jul 31;137(3):473-477 - PubMed
  11. Pain. 2003 Sep;105(1-2):285-91 - PubMed
  12. Ann Neurol. 1981 Jun;9(6):607-11 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Pain. 2021 Aug;25(7):1389-1428 - PubMed
  14. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Oct;95(4):518-23 - PubMed
  15. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Jan-Feb;77(1):28-38 - PubMed
  16. J Neurophysiol. 2015 Nov;114(5):2672-81 - PubMed
  17. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010 Oct;49(10):661-9 - PubMed
  18. Neurol Sci. 2019 Jul;40(7):1425-1431 - PubMed
  19. J Pain. 2010 Dec;11(12):1241-9 - PubMed
  20. J Neurophysiol. 1991 Jul;66(1):228-46 - PubMed
  21. Brain. 1991 Feb;114 ( Pt 1B):361-79 - PubMed
  22. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1981 Oct;52(4):257-75 - PubMed
  23. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Nov 1;116(5):2210-2220 - PubMed
  24. Eur J Pain. 2020 Nov;24(10):2015-2026 - PubMed
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 13;102(50):18195-200 - PubMed
  26. J Neurophysiol. 1997 Oct;78(4):1973-82 - PubMed
  27. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2002 Oct;40(1-3):29-44 - PubMed
  28. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Aug;119(8):1705-1719 - PubMed
  29. J Neurophysiol. 2014 Apr;111(8):1564-73 - PubMed
  30. Pain. 1992 Nov;51(2):207-219 - PubMed
  31. Anesthesiology. 2016 Nov;125(5):846-849 - PubMed
  32. J Neurophysiol. 1991 Jul;66(1):190-211 - PubMed
  33. Prog Neurobiol. 1992;38(4):397-421 - PubMed
  34. J Neurophysiol. 2013 Sep;110(5):1107-16 - PubMed
  35. J Pain. 2021 May;22(5):487-497 - PubMed
  36. Acta Physiol Scand. 1995 Sep;155(1):87-97 - PubMed
  37. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Aug;128(8):1445-1456 - PubMed
  38. Pain. 2011 Jul;152(7):1532-1539 - PubMed
  39. J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Jul;65:17-22 - PubMed
  40. Pain Med. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):736-746 - PubMed
  41. Pain. 2008 Dec;140(3):456-464 - PubMed
  42. Pain. 2016 Aug;157(8):1682-1695 - PubMed
  43. J Neurosci. 2000 Dec 15;20(24):9277-83 - PubMed
  44. Pain. 1993 Apr;53(1):43-51 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support