Display options
Share it on

Int J Popul Data Sci. 2021 Oct 07;6(1):1686. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1686. eCollection 2021.

Multigenerational health research using population-based linked databases: an international review.

International journal of population data science

Naomi C Hamm, Amani F Hamad, Elizabeth Wall-Wieler, Leslie L Roos, Oleguer Plana-Ripoll, Lisa M Lix

Affiliations

  1. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, CANADA, R3E 0W3.
  2. Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, CANADA, R3E 3P5.
  3. National Centre for Register-based Research, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DENMARK, 8210.

PMID: 34734126 PMCID: PMC8530190 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1686

Abstract

Family health history is a well-established risk factor for many health conditions but the systematic collection of health histories, particularly for multiple generations and multiple family members, can be challenging. Routinely-collected electronic databases in a select number of sites worldwide offer a powerful tool to conduct multigenerational health research for entire populations. At these sites, administrative and healthcare records are used to construct familial relationships and objectively-measured health histories. We review and synthesize published literature to compare the attributes of routinely-collected, linked databases for three European sites (Denmark, Norway, Sweden) and three non-European sites (Canadian province of Manitoba, Taiwan, Australian state of Western Australia) with the capability to conduct population-based multigenerational health research. Our review found that European sites primarily identified family structures using population registries, whereas non-European sites used health insurance registries (Manitoba and Taiwan) or linked data from multiple sources (Western Australia). Information on familial status was reported to be available as early as 1947 (Sweden); Taiwan had the fewest years of data available (1995 onwards). All centres reported near complete coverage of familial relationships for their population catchment regions. Challenges in working with these data include differentiating biological and legal relationships, establishing accurate familial linkages over time, and accurately identifying health conditions. This review provides important insights about the benefits and challenges of using routinely-collected, population-based linked databases for conducting population-based multigenerational health research, and identifies opportunities for future research within and across the data-intensive environments at these six sites.

Keywords: family health history; multigenerational; observational research; population registries; record linkage; routinely-collected data

Conflict of interest statement

Statement on conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

References

  1. Lancet. 2019 Aug 17;394(10198):596-603 - PubMed
  2. Bone. 2020 Oct;139:115557 - PubMed
  3. Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):34-7 - PubMed
  4. Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 12;11:563-591 - PubMed
  5. J Intern Med. 2013 Dec;274(6):547-60 - PubMed
  6. Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct;103 Suppl 1:S46-55 - PubMed
  7. Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):22-5 - PubMed
  8. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 27;10(1):1219 - PubMed
  9. Int J Cardiol. 2020 May 15;307:114-118 - PubMed
  10. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Jun;82(6):491-2 - PubMed
  11. Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;44(6):1800-13 - PubMed
  12. Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;37(1):30-5 - PubMed
  13. Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):968-77 - PubMed
  14. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013 Feb;16(1):157-62 - PubMed
  15. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;57(1):28-32.e1 - PubMed
  16. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Nov;94(11):3236-8 - PubMed
  17. Clin Epidemiol. 2019 May 03;11:349-358 - PubMed
  18. J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Apr;32(4):716-721 - PubMed
  19. Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):83-6 - PubMed
  20. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):27-33 - PubMed
  21. Int J Public Health. 2013 Feb;58(1):57-64 - PubMed
  22. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;675:215-20 - PubMed
  23. J Intern Med. 2015 Jan;277(1):94-136 - PubMed
  24. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Dec;11(12):1638-44 - PubMed
  25. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;62(8):1010-1018 - PubMed
  26. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Mar;68(3):283-7 - PubMed
  27. J Formos Med Assoc. 2004 Apr;103(4):297-301 - PubMed
  28. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;33(1):27-36 - PubMed
  29. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Jul 1;105(7): - PubMed
  30. Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):75-8 - PubMed
  31. Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;43(2):536-44 - PubMed
  32. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;53(11):1105-1115 - PubMed
  33. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Oct 15;152(8):704-15 - PubMed
  34. Scand J Public Health. 2015 Jun;43(4):333-9 - PubMed
  35. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;32(9):765-773 - PubMed
  36. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1990;39(4):427-39 - PubMed
  37. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Nov;70(5):619-626 - PubMed
  38. Cell. 2018 Jun 14;173(7):1692-1704.e11 - PubMed
  39. Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;23(8):1756-1763 - PubMed
  40. Lancet. 2014 Mar 15;383(9921):999-1008 - PubMed
  41. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2021 Jul-Aug;40(7-8):230-241 - PubMed
  42. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e023614 - PubMed
  43. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019 Jun;43(3):261-266 - PubMed
  44. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;29(8):541-9 - PubMed
  45. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:69-87 1 p following 87 - PubMed
  46. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 15;151(12):872-7 - PubMed
  47. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 09;11:450 - PubMed
  48. Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):441-9 - PubMed
  49. Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Jan 15;179(2):177-85 - PubMed
  50. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Jul;16(7):726-35 - PubMed
  51. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2005 Aug;48:s4-7 - PubMed
  52. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Jan 15;: - PubMed

Publication Types