Display options
Share it on

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Oct 27; doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07138-0. Epub 2021 Oct 27.

Revision surgery for chronically discharging mastoid cavities: mastoid obliteration with canal wall reconstruction versus non-obliteration surgery.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Hylke F E van der Toom, Marc P van der Schroeff, Tim L Molenaar, Mick Metselaar, Anne van Linge, Jantien L Vroegop, Robert J Pauw

Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected].
  2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

PMID: 34705081 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07138-0

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical results of revision canal wall down (CWD) surgery for chronically discharging mastoid cavities and to compare the non-obliteration approach to mastoid obliteration with canal wall reconstruction.

METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. All adult patients (≥ 18 years) who underwent revision surgery for chronically draining mastoid cavities between January 2013 and January 2020 were included. Primary outcome measures included the dry ear rate, complications and postoperative hearing.

RESULTS: 79 ears were included; 56 ears received revision CWD with mastoid obliteration and posterior canal wall reconstruction and 23 ears received CWD without mastoid obliteration. The dry ear rate at the most recent outpatient clinic visit (median 28.0 months postoperative) was significantly higher in the obliteration group with 96.4% compared to 73.9% for the non-obliteration group (p = .002). There were no differences in audiological outcome and incidence of complications between the two techniques.

CONCLUSION: We show that in our study population revision CWD surgery with mastoid obliteration and posterior canal wall reconstruction is superior to revision CWD surgery without mastoid obliteration in the management of chronically discharging mastoid cavities. In the obliteration group, a dry ear was achieved in 96.4% as this was 73.9% in the non-obliteration group. We found no differences in audiological outcome and in incidence of complications between the two techniques.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Keywords: Cholesteatoma; Mastoid bowl; Mastoid cavity; Obliteration; Otitis; Revision

References

  1. van der Toom HFE, van der Schroeff MP, Pauw RJ (2018) Single-stage mastoid obliteration in cholesteatoma surgery and recurrent and residual disease rates: a systematic review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 144(5):440–446 - PubMed
  2. Tomlin J, Chang D, McCutcheon B, Harris J (2013) Surgical technique and recurrence in cholesteatoma: a meta-analysis. Audiol Neurotol 18(3):135–142 - PubMed
  3. van der Toom H, van der Schroeff MP, Janssen J, Westzaan AM, Pauw RJ (2020) A retrospective analysis and comparison of the STAM and STAMCO classification and EAONO/JOS cholesteatoma staging system in predicting surgical treatment outcomes of middle ear cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 41(4):e468–e474 - PubMed
  4. Uluyol S, Ugur O, Arslan IB, Yagiz O, Gumussoy M, Cukurova I (2018) Effects of cavity reconstruction on morbidity and quality of life after canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 84(5):608–613 - PubMed
  5. Mehta RP, Harris JP (2006) Mastoid obliteration. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 39(6):1129–1142 - PubMed
  6. Palva T (1973) Operative technique in mastoid obliteration. Acta Otolaryngol 75(4):289–290 - PubMed
  7. Sade J, Weinberg J, Berco E, Brown M, Halevy A (1982) The marsupialized (radical) mastoid. J Laryngol Otol 96(10):869–875 - PubMed
  8. Vercruysse JP, van Dinther JJ, De Foer B et al (2016) Long-term Results of troublesome CWD cavity reconstruction by mastoid and epitympanic bony obliteration (CWR-BOT) in adults. Otol Neurotol 37(6):698–703 - PubMed
  9. Yung M, Tassone P, Moumoulidis I, Vivekanandan S (2011) Surgical management of troublesome mastoid cavities. J Laryngol Otol 125(3):221–226 - PubMed
  10. Kasenomm P (2013) Intraoperative findings of revision canal wall-down tympanomastoid surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 133(8):826–832 - PubMed
  11. Phelan E, Harney M, Burns H (2008) Intraoperative findings in revision canal wall down mastoidectomy. Ir Med J 101(1):14 - PubMed
  12. Black B (1998) Mastoidectomy elimination: obliterate, reconstruct, or ablate? Am J Otol 19(5):551–557 - PubMed
  13. Geerse S, Ebbens FA, de Wolf MJ, van Spronsen E (2017) Successful obliteration of troublesome and chronically draining cavities. J Laryngol Otol 131(2):138–143 - PubMed
  14. Liu SC, Wang CH, Huang BR (2015) Obliteration of radical cavities and total reconstruction procedure without staging after canal wall down mastoidectomy: long-term results. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 8(3):230–236 - PubMed
  15. Mills RP (1988) Surgical management of the discharging mastoid cavity. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 16:1–6 - PubMed
  16. Patil S, Trinidade A, Wong B, Yung MW (2021) Secondary obliteration surgery for troublesome mastoid cavities: a prospective series of 228 pediatric and adult cases. Otol Neurotol 42(7):e881–e886 - PubMed
  17. Singh V, Atlas M (2007) Obliteration of the persistently discharging mastoid cavity using the middle temporal artery flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137(3):433–438 - PubMed
  18. Mirck PG (1996) The M-meatoplasty of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 106(3 Pt 1):367–369 - PubMed

Publication Types