Display options
Share it on

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Oct 24;7(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00927-8.

Facilitating treatment engagement for early psychosis through peer-delivered decision support: intervention development and protocol for pilot evaluation.

Pilot and feasibility studies

Elizabeth C Thomas, John Suarez, Alicia Lucksted, Laura A Siminoff, Irene Hurford, Lisa B Dixon, Maria O'Connell, David L Penn, Mark S Salzer

Affiliations

  1. Temple University College of Public Health, 1700 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA. [email protected].
  2. Temple University College of Public Health, 1700 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA.
  3. University of Maryland School of Medicine, 737 West Lombard Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
  4. Irene Hurford MD PLLC, 261 Old York Road #925, Jenkintown, PA, 19046, USA.
  5. Columbia University Department of Psychiatry, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
  6. Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
  7. Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 256 Davie Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.
  8. Australian Catholic University, School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

PMID: 34689830 PMCID: PMC8543800 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00927-8

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emerging adults with early psychosis demonstrate high rates of service disengagement from critical early intervention services. Decision support interventions and peer support have both been shown to enhance service engagement but are understudied in this population. The purposes of this article are to describe the development of a novel peer-delivered decision coaching intervention for this population and to report plans for a pilot study designed to gather preliminary data about its feasibility, acceptability, and potential impact.

METHODS: The intervention was developed based on formative qualitative data and in collaboration with a diverse team of researchers, key stakeholders, and expert consultants. The pilot trial will utilize a single-group (N = 20), pre-post, convergent mixed-methods design to explore whether and how the intervention addresses decision-making needs (the primary intervention target). The impact of the intervention on secondary outcomes (e.g., engagement in the program) will also be assessed. Additionally, through observation and feedback from the peer decision coach and study participants, we will evaluate the feasibility of research and intervention procedures, and the acceptability of information and support from the peer decision coach.

DISCUSSION: The peer-delivered decision coaching intervention holds promise for assisting young people with making informed and values-consistent decisions about their care, and potentially enhancing service engagement within this traditionally difficult-to-engage population. If the intervention demonstrates feasibility and acceptability, and pilot data show its potential for improving treatment decision-making, our work will also lay the foundation for a new evidence base regarding roles for peer specialists on early intervention teams.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04532034 ) on 28 August 2020 as Temple University Protocol Record 261047, Facilitating Engagement in Evidence-Based Treatment for Early Psychosis.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Keywords: Coordinated specialty care; First-episode psychosis; Peer support; Shared decision making; Young adults

References

  1. Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Aug 9;:appips202000429 - PubMed
  2. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2016 Dec;39(4):352-360 - PubMed
  3. Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Oct;63(10):1042-6 - PubMed
  4. J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;5(1):29-33 - PubMed
  5. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Sep;36(3):209-14 - PubMed
  6. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994 Jan;89(1):62-7 - PubMed
  7. Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Aug;57(8):1179-84 - PubMed
  8. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;77(6):764-71 - PubMed
  9. Patient Educ Couns. 1998 Mar;33(3):267-79 - PubMed
  10. World Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;15(1):13-20 - PubMed
  11. Can J Nurs Res. 1996 Fall;28(3):13-27 - PubMed
  12. Can J Nurs Res. 1997 Fall;29(3):21-43 - PubMed
  13. Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Aug;48(8):1042-7 - PubMed
  14. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S12 - PubMed
  15. Breast. 2016 Apr;26:31-45 - PubMed
  16. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;65(7):762-71 - PubMed
  17. Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jul;50(3):235-45 - PubMed
  18. Med Decis Making. 1996 Jan-Mar;16(1):58-64 - PubMed
  19. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Nov;22(9):688-97 - PubMed
  20. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Mar;43(2):259-69 - PubMed
  21. Schizophr Res. 2008 Mar;100(1-3):60-9 - PubMed
  22. Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jul;32(3):443-50 - PubMed
  23. Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Apr 1;65(4):442-53 - PubMed
  24. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1998;172(33):53-9 - PubMed
  25. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Dec;36(4):278-88 - PubMed
  26. Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Apr 1;68(4):318-320 - PubMed
  27. Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30 - PubMed
  28. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92 - PubMed
  29. Med Decis Making. 2012 May-Jun;32(3):E22-33 - PubMed
  30. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Sep;49(5):651-61 - PubMed
  31. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2011 Nov;37(6):525-31 - PubMed
  32. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;: - PubMed
  33. Psychiatr Serv. 2010 May;61(5):520-3 - PubMed
  34. Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Jan 1;65(1):116-20 - PubMed
  35. Community Ment Health J. 1999 Jun;35(3):231-9 - PubMed
  36. Schizophr Bull. 2016 Jul;42(4):896-906 - PubMed
  37. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010 Summer;34(1):7-13 - PubMed
  38. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;154(3):405-20 - PubMed
  39. Psychiatr Serv. 2014 May 1;65(5):603-11 - PubMed
  40. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Nov 30;219(3):420-5 - PubMed
  41. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;60(9):940-51 - PubMed
  42. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869 - PubMed
  43. Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jul;66(7):680-90 - PubMed
  44. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2012 Spring;35(4):305-14 - PubMed
  45. Braz J Psychiatry. 2015 Apr-Jun;37(2):168-76 - PubMed
  46. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 May;45(5):626-9 - PubMed
  47. BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Nov 09;12:196 - PubMed
  48. J Ment Health. 2002;11(2):191-8 - PubMed
  49. Eff Clin Pract. 1999 Jul-Aug;2(4):163-70 - PubMed
  50. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2012 Winter;35(3):219-29 - PubMed
  51. Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Jun;59(6):603-5 - PubMed
  52. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;51(1):1-13 - PubMed
  53. Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Nov;54(11):1467-74 - PubMed
  54. BMJ. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):602 - PubMed
  55. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;163(12):2080-9 - PubMed
  56. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S11 - PubMed
  57. Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 1;173(4):362-72 - PubMed
  58. JAMA. 2013 Aug 21;310(7):689-90 - PubMed
  59. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2018 Sep;41(3):216-223 - PubMed
  60. Psychol Med. 2015 Apr;45(6):1181-93 - PubMed
  61. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004 Spring;27(4):392-401 - PubMed
  62. Med Decis Making. 2016 Aug;36(6):777-90 - PubMed
  63. Schizophr Res. 2010 May;118(1-3):256-63 - PubMed
  64. Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1192-203 - PubMed
  65. Psychiatry Res. 2003 Nov 1;121(1):31-49 - PubMed
  66. Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):1856-72 - PubMed
  67. Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jul;66(7):699-704 - PubMed
  68. Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56 - PubMed
  69. Mil Med. 2014 Feb;179(2):143-9 - PubMed
  70. Qual Health Res. 2005 Oct;15(8):1129-40 - PubMed
  71. Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;205(2):88-94 - PubMed
  72. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2008;5(1):25-35 - PubMed
  73. Psychol Serv. 2018 Nov;15(4):437-441 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support