Display options
Share it on

J Vis. 2021 Oct 05;21(11):18. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.11.18.

The generality of the critical spacing for crowded optotypes: From Bouma to the 21st century.

Journal of vision

Daniel R Coates, Charles J H Ludowici, Susana T L Chung

Affiliations

  1. College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  2. [email protected].
  3. School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  4. [email protected].
  5. School of Optometry, Vision Science Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  6. [email protected].

PMID: 34694326 PMCID: PMC8556556 DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.11.18

Abstract

It is rare to find a crowding manuscript that fails to mention "Bouma's law," the rule of thumb stating that flankers within a distance of about one half of the target eccentricity will induce crowding. Here we investigate the generality of this rule (even for just optotypes), the factors that modulate the critical spacing, and the evidence for the rule in Bouma's own data. We explore these questions by reanalyzing a variety of studies from the literature, running several new control experiments, and by utilizing a model that unifies flanked identification measurements between psychophysical paradigms. Specifically, with minimal assumptions (equivalent psychometric slopes across conditions, for example), crowded acuity can be predicted for arbitrary target sizes and flanker spacings, revealing a performance "landscape" that delineates the critical spacing. Last, we present a compact quantitative summary of the effects of different types of stimulus manipulations on optotype crowding.

References

  1. J Vis. 2011 Nov 18;11(13):18 - PubMed
  2. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1984;82:753-91 - PubMed
  3. J Neurosci. 1989 Jul;9(7):2432-42 - PubMed
  4. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980 Dec;57(12):915-24 - PubMed
  5. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;15(4):160-8 - PubMed
  6. J Vis. 2014 Dec 04;14(6):9 - PubMed
  7. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987 Oct;4(10):2006-21 - PubMed
  8. Vision Res. 2014 Aug;101:167-76 - PubMed
  9. Nature. 1970 Apr 11;226(5241):177-8 - PubMed
  10. N Engl J Med. 1987 May 14;316(20):1238-43 - PubMed
  11. Vision Res. 2007 Nov;47(25):3150-9 - PubMed
  12. J Vis. 2014 Dec 30;14(6):11 - PubMed
  13. Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(20):3514-25 - PubMed
  14. Vision Res. 2019 Mar;156:84-95 - PubMed
  15. Science. 1963 Nov 15;142(3594):979-80 - PubMed
  16. Curr Biol. 2009 Dec 15;19(23):1988-93 - PubMed
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 25;114(17):E3573-E3582 - PubMed
  18. J Vis. 2011 Jul 05;11(8): - PubMed
  19. Nat Neurosci. 2008 Oct;11(10):1129-35 - PubMed
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Oct 12;96(21):12073-8 - PubMed
  21. Vision Res. 1992 Apr;32(4):771-7 - PubMed
  22. J Vis. 2002;2(2):167-77 - PubMed
  23. Vision Res. 2018 Dec;153:13-23 - PubMed
  24. Percept Psychophys. 1991 Jun;49(6):495-508 - PubMed
  25. J Vis. 2007 Nov 20;7(2):23.1-12 - PubMed
  26. J Vis. 2009 Apr 17;9(4):14.1-18 - PubMed
  27. J Vis. 2011 May 25;11(6): - PubMed
  28. Neuron. 2012 Jul 26;75(2):250-64 - PubMed
  29. J Vis. 2005 Dec 29;5(11):1024-37 - PubMed
  30. Am J Ophthalmol. 1962 Mar;53:471-7 - PubMed
  31. Vision Res. 1992 Jul;32(7):1349-57 - PubMed
  32. Vision Res. 2013 Jan 25;77:41-50 - PubMed
  33. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Jul;90(7):628-38 - PubMed
  34. J Vis. 2004 Dec 30;4(12):1136-69 - PubMed
  35. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 15;8(1):9177 - PubMed
  36. J Vis. 2014 May 05;14(5):3 - PubMed
  37. J Vis. 2011 Jun 17;11(7):15 - PubMed
  38. J Neurophysiol. 2002 Nov;88(5):2530-46 - PubMed
  39. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Aug;18(4):445-51 - PubMed
  40. Nat Neurosci. 2012 Jan 08;15(3):463-9, S1-2 - PubMed
  41. J Vis. 2009 Feb 06;9(2):5.1-11 - PubMed
  42. Iperception. 2020 May 19;11(3):2041669520913052 - PubMed
  43. Vision Res. 2001 Jun;41(14):1833-50 - PubMed
  44. J Vis. 2005 Feb 04;5(1):58-70 - PubMed
  45. J Vis. 2014 Dec 10;14(6):10 - PubMed
  46. Vision Res. 1980;20(3):235-41 - PubMed
  47. Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(5):635-54 - PubMed
  48. J Vis. 2015;15(6):5 - PubMed
  49. Nat Neurosci. 1999 Aug;2(8):733-9 - PubMed
  50. Vision Res. 2009 Nov;49(23):2782-9 - PubMed
  51. Neuropsychologia. 1977;15(1):69-80 - PubMed
  52. Vision Res. 2016 May;122:81-92 - PubMed
  53. J Neurosci. 2014 May 21;34(21):7351-60 - PubMed
  54. J Vis. 2010 Mar 23;10(3):1.1-14 - PubMed
  55. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 Jan;16(1):49-57 - PubMed
  56. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1951 Jun;45(6):704-25 - PubMed
  57. Vision Res. 2013 May 24;84:50-9 - PubMed
  58. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35829 - PubMed
  59. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1953 Apr;49(4):431-4 - PubMed
  60. Percept Psychophys. 1982 Dec;32(6):576-80 - PubMed
  61. Spat Vis. 1994;8(2):255-79 - PubMed
  62. J Vis. 2020 Sep 2;20(9):18 - PubMed
  63. J Neurosci. 2013 Nov 13;33(46):18080-6 - PubMed
  64. J Vis. 2007 Feb 05;7(2):4.1-12 - PubMed
  65. J Vis. 2007 Oct 26;7(2):20.1-36 - PubMed
  66. J Vis. 2007 Nov 27;7(2):25.1-18 - PubMed
  67. J Vis. 2012 Sep 26;12(10):13 - PubMed
  68. Vision Res. 2002 Sep;42(20):2357-69 - PubMed
  69. J Vis. 2013 Jan 18;13(1):24 - PubMed
  70. Optom Vis Sci. 2000 May;77(5):270-5 - PubMed
  71. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 Dec 15;116(6):735-40 - PubMed
  72. J Opt Soc Am. 1963 Sep;53:1026-32 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support