Display options
Cite
Christou AS, Amalou A, Lee H, et al. Image-Guided Robotics for Standardized and Automated Biopsy and Ablation. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2021;38(5):565-575doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739164.
Christou, A. S., Amalou, A., Lee, H., Rivera, J., Li, R., Kassin, M. T., Varble, N., Tsz Ho Tse, Z., Xu, S., & Wood, B. J. (2021). Image-Guided Robotics for Standardized and Automated Biopsy and Ablation. Seminars in interventional radiology, 38(5), 565-575. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739164
Christou, Anna S, et al. "Image-Guided Robotics for Standardized and Automated Biopsy and Ablation." Seminars in interventional radiology vol. 38,5 (2021): 565-575. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739164
Christou AS, Amalou A, Lee H, Rivera J, Li R, Kassin MT, Varble N, Tsz Ho Tse Z, Xu S, Wood BJ. Image-Guided Robotics for Standardized and Automated Biopsy and Ablation. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2021 Nov 24;38(5):565-575. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739164. eCollection 2021 Dec. PMID: 34853503; PMCID: PMC8612841.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Semin Intervent Radiol. 2021 Nov 24;38(5):565-575. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739164. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Image-Guided Robotics for Standardized and Automated Biopsy and Ablation.

Seminars in interventional radiology

Anna S Christou, Amel Amalou, HooWon Lee, Jocelyne Rivera, Rui Li, Michael T Kassin, Nicole Varble, Zion Tsz Ho Tse, Sheng Xu, Bradford J Wood

Affiliations

  1. Center for Interventional Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  2. Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, New York.
  3. Philips Research North America, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  4. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom.
  5. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  6. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  7. Interventional Radiology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

PMID: 34853503 PMCID: PMC8612841 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739164

Abstract

Image-guided robotics for biopsy and ablation aims to minimize procedure times, reduce needle manipulations, radiation, and complications, and enable treatment of larger and more complex tumors, while facilitating standardization for more uniform and improved outcomes. Robotic navigation of needles enables standardized and uniform procedures which enhance reproducibility via real-time precision feedback, while avoiding radiation exposure to the operator. Robots can be integrated with computed tomography (CT), cone beam CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound and through various techniques, including stereotaxy, table-mounted, floor-mounted, and patient-mounted robots. The history, challenges, solutions, and questions facing the field of interventional radiology (IR) and interventional oncology are reviewed, to enable responsible clinical adoption and value definition via ergonomics, workflows, business models, and outcome data. IR-integrated robotics is ready for broader adoption. The robots are coming!

Thieme. All rights reserved.

Keywords: ablation; biopsy; interventional radiology; robotics; stereotactic navigation; treatment planning

References

  1. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 May;43(5):756-764 - PubMed
  2. Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):925-926 - PubMed
  3. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Jul;31(7):1074-1082 - PubMed
  4. World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2550-7 - PubMed
  5. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:27-37 - PubMed
  6. Hepatology. 2019 Sep;70(3):840-850 - PubMed
  7. Eur Surg. 2018;50(3):117-124 - PubMed
  8. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Jan;18(1 Pt 1):9-24 - PubMed
  9. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Dec;31(12):2122-2131 - PubMed
  10. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2015 Jun;5(3):340-3 - PubMed
  11. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Oct;213(4):W171-W179 - PubMed
  12. Front Oncol. 2020 Jun 10;10:842 - PubMed
  13. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2058-2064 - PubMed
  14. Ann Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;46(10):1479-1497 - PubMed
  15. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Aug;33(8):1702-25 - PubMed
  16. J Neurosurg. 2019 Nov 29;:1-7 - PubMed
  17. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015 Feb;24(1):45-53 - PubMed
  18. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005 Feb;33(1):13-8 - PubMed
  19. Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):927-933 - PubMed
  20. Med Oncol. 2020 May 18;37(6):55 - PubMed
  21. Comput Aided Surg. 2000;5(2):98-107 - PubMed
  22. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2006 Mar;23(1):85-98 - PubMed
  23. Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):263-272 - PubMed
  24. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 May;44(5):774-781 - PubMed
  25. Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1342-1349 - PubMed
  26. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Winter;32(4):1030-1035 - PubMed
  27. Radiol Oncol. 2020 May 28;54(3):295-300 - PubMed
  28. Ann Biomed Eng. 2018 Mar;46(3):452-463 - PubMed
  29. Eur J Radiol Open. 2018 Dec 05;6:1-8 - PubMed
  30. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2020;13:212-232 - PubMed
  31. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2011 Sep;6(5):693-8 - PubMed
  32. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 4;11(1):5218 - PubMed
  33. Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):277-82 - PubMed
  34. Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Jun;74(3):369-376 - PubMed
  35. Front Surg. 2020 Nov 16;7:596925 - PubMed
  36. Radiology. 2019 Mar;290(3):826-832 - PubMed
  37. Invest Radiol. 1979 Jul-Aug;14(4):300-4 - PubMed
  38. Urol Clin North Am. 2014 Nov;41(4):591-6 - PubMed
  39. Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 2;10(1):18835 - PubMed
  40. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 Feb;42(2):283-288 - PubMed
  41. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Oct;46(10):5007-5016 - PubMed
  42. Eur Radiol. 2014 Mar;24(3):723-30 - PubMed
  43. Comput Aided Surg. 2008 Sep;13(5):255-64 - PubMed
  44. Liver Int. 2019 Oct;39(10):1975-1985 - PubMed

Publication Types