Med Phys. 2021 Nov 18; doi: 10.1002/mp.15360. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

Normal tissue complication probability modelling to guide individual treatment planning in paediatric cranial proton and photon radiotherapy.

Medical physics

Mikaela Dell'Oro, Puthenparampil Wilson, Michala Short, Chia-Ho Hua, Thomas E Merchant, Eva Bezak

PMID: 34796509 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15360

Abstract

PURPOSE: Proton beam therapy (PT) is broadly accepted as the gold standard of care for paediatric patients with cranial cancer. The superior dose distribution of PT compared to photon radiotherapy reduces normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for organs at risk. As NTCPs for paediatric organs are not well understood, clinics generally base radiation response on adult data. However, there is evidence that radiation response strongly depends on age and even sex of a patient. Furthermore, questions surround the influence of individual intrinsic radiosensitivity (α/β ratio) on paediatric NTCP. While the clinical paediatric NTCP data is scarce, radiobiological modelling and sensitivity analyses can be used to investigate the NTCP trends and its dependence on individual modelling parameters. The purpose of this study was to perform sensitivity analyses of NTCP models to ascertain the dependence of radiosensitivity, sex and age of a child and predict cranial side-effects following intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODS: Previously, six gender-matched paediatric cranial datasets (5, 9 and 13 years-old) were planned in Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (13.7). Up to 108 scanning beam IMPT plans and 108 IMRT plans were retrospectively optimised for a range of simulated target volumes and locations. In this work, dose-volume histograms were extracted and imported into BioSuite Software for radiobiological modelling. Relative-Seriality and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models were used to calculate NTCP values for toxicity endpoints, where TD50, (based on reported adult clinical data) was varied to simulate sex dependence of NTCP. Plausible parameter ranges, based on published literature for adults, were used in modelling. In addition to sensitivity analyses, 20% difference in TD50 was used to represent the radiosensitivity between the sexes (with females considered more radiosensitive) for ease of data comparison as a function of parameters such as α/β ratio.

RESULTS: IMPT plans resulted in lower NTCP compared to IMRT across all models (p < 0.0001). For medulloblastoma treatment, the risk of brainstem necrosis (>10%) and cochlea tinnitus (>20%) amongst females could potentially be underestimated considering a lower TD50 value for females. Sensitivity analyses show that the difference in NTCP between sexes was significant (p < 0.0001). Similarly, both brainstem necrosis and tinnitus NTCP varied significantly (p < 0.0001) across tested α/β as a function of TD50 values (assumption being that TD50 values are 20% lower in females). If the true α/β of these paediatric tissues is higher than expected (α/β ∼ 3), the risk of tinnitus for IMRT can significantly increase (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: Due to the scarcity of paediatric NTCP data available, sensitivity analyses were performed using plausible ranges based on published adult data. In the clinical scenario where, if female paediatric patients were 20% more radiosensitive (lower TD50 value), they could be up to twice as likely to experience side-effects of brainstem necrosis and cochlea tinnitus compared to males, highlighting the need for considering the sex in NTCP models. Based on our sensitivity analyses, age and sex of a paediatric patient could significantly affect the resultant NTCP from cranial radiation therapy, especially at higher α/β values. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords: NTCP; normal tissue complication probability; paediatric; proton therapy; radiosensitivity; sex specific; α/β

Publication Types

• Journal Article