Display options
Cite
Gwinnett C, Miller RZ. Are we contaminating our samples? A preliminary study to investigate procedural contamination during field sampling and processing for microplastic and anthropogenic microparticles. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021;173:113095doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113095.
Gwinnett, C., & Miller, R. Z. (2021). Are we contaminating our samples? A preliminary study to investigate procedural contamination during field sampling and processing for microplastic and anthropogenic microparticles. Marine pollution bulletin, 173113095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113095
Gwinnett, C, and Miller, R Z. "Are we contaminating our samples? A preliminary study to investigate procedural contamination during field sampling and processing for microplastic and anthropogenic microparticles." Marine pollution bulletin vol. 173 (2021): 113095. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113095
Gwinnett C, Miller RZ. Are we contaminating our samples? A preliminary study to investigate procedural contamination during field sampling and processing for microplastic and anthropogenic microparticles. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Dec;173:113095. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113095. Epub 2021 Nov 09. PMID: 34768195.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Dec;173:113095. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113095. Epub 2021 Nov 09.

Are we contaminating our samples? A preliminary study to investigate procedural contamination during field sampling and processing for microplastic and anthropogenic microparticles.

Marine pollution bulletin

C Gwinnett, R Z Miller

Affiliations

  1. Staffordshire University, Microplastic and Forensic Fibres Research Group, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].
  2. Rozalia Project for a Clean Ocean, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].

PMID: 34768195 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113095

Abstract

Methods for sampling, analysis and interpretation of fresh and saltwater microplastics and anthropogenic microfibers have improved since 2004, but techniques for reducing and monitoring procedural contamination are still limited. Quantifying the amount of procedural contamination introduced to samples improves the robustness of counts of microplastics and anthropogenic microfibers in the environment. This pilot study investigates procedural contamination introduced into water samples when rigorous QA/QC anti-contamination protocols are used and removed. Procedural contamination accounted for 33.8% of the total microfibers and microplastics found in samples when protocols were used (n = 81), but 70.7% when they were not (n = 8). With the use of extensive control sampling and full characterization of samples (morphological, optical and chemical) it was possible to identify the predominant sources of contamination (crew clothing) and make recommendations for anti-contamination and procedural contamination identification/reduction protocols for shoreline and small/medium sized vessel sampling for microplastics and anthropogenic microfibers.

Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Anti-contamination; Contamination control; Field sampling; Microfiber; Microplastic; QA/QC

Publication Types