Display options
Cite
Malisoux L, Gette P, Backes A, et al. Relevance of Frequency-Domain Analyses to Relate Shoe Cushioning, Ground Impact Forces and Running Injury Risk: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial With 800+ Recreational Runners. Front Sports Act Living. 2021;3:744658doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.744658.
Malisoux, L., Gette, P., Backes, A., Delattre, N., Cabri, J., & Theisen, D. (2021). Relevance of Frequency-Domain Analyses to Relate Shoe Cushioning, Ground Impact Forces and Running Injury Risk: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial With 800+ Recreational Runners. Frontiers in sports and active living, 3744658. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.744658
Malisoux, Laurent, et al. "Relevance of Frequency-Domain Analyses to Relate Shoe Cushioning, Ground Impact Forces and Running Injury Risk: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial With 800+ Recreational Runners." Frontiers in sports and active living vol. 3 (2021): 744658. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.744658
Malisoux L, Gette P, Backes A, Delattre N, Cabri J, Theisen D. Relevance of Frequency-Domain Analyses to Relate Shoe Cushioning, Ground Impact Forces and Running Injury Risk: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial With 800+ Recreational Runners. Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Nov 11;3:744658. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.744658. eCollection 2021. PMID: 34859204; PMCID: PMC8632264.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Nov 11;3:744658. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.744658. eCollection 2021.

Relevance of Frequency-Domain Analyses to Relate Shoe Cushioning, Ground Impact Forces and Running Injury Risk: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial With 800+ Recreational Runners.

Frontiers in sports and active living

Laurent Malisoux, Paul Gette, Anne Backes, Nicolas Delattre, Jan Cabri, Daniel Theisen

Affiliations

  1. Department of Population Health, Physical Activity, Sport and Health Research Group, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
  2. Department of Population Health, Human Motion, Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Digital Methods Research Group, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
  3. Decathlon Sports Lab, Movement Sciences Department, Decathlon SA, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
  4. Luxembourg Institute of Research in Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Science, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
  5. ALAN-Maladies Rares Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

PMID: 34859204 PMCID: PMC8632264 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.744658

Abstract

Cushioning systems in running shoes are used assuming that ground impact forces relate to injury risk and that cushioning materials reduce these impact forces. In our recent trial, the more cushioned shoe version was associated with lower injury risk. However, vertical impact peak force was higher in participants with the Soft shoe version. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the effect of shoe cushioning on the time, magnitude and frequency characteristics of peak forces using frequency-domain analysis by comparing the two study groups from our recent trial (Hard and Soft shoe group, respectively). The secondary objective was to investigate if force characteristics are prospectively associated with the risk of running-related injury. This is a secondary analysis of a double-blinded randomized trial on shoe cushioning with a biomechanical running analysis at baseline and a 6-month follow-up on running exposure and injury. Participants (

Copyright © 2021 Malisoux, Gette, Backes, Delattre, Cabri and Theisen.

Keywords: biomechanics; footwear; frequency-domain analysis; injury prevention; kinetics; prospective study

Conflict of interest statement

ND is employed at Decathlon. Decathlon also provided the standard running shoes. A research partnership agreement was signed between Decathlon and the LIH. The remaining authors declare that the resea

References

  1. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Sep;18(8):1083-1089 - PubMed
  2. Gait Posture. 2017 Jul;56:54-59 - PubMed
  3. J Biomech. 1980;13(5):397-406 - PubMed
  4. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jun 07;6(6):2325967118775720 - PubMed
  5. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;54(1):51-57 - PubMed
  6. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 21;10(4):e0125196 - PubMed
  7. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 May;36(5):845-9 - PubMed
  8. Sports Med. 2017 May;47(5):869-886 - PubMed
  9. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Nov;27(11):1170-1180 - PubMed
  10. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 May;45(5):375-80 - PubMed
  11. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;48(5):371-6 - PubMed
  12. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):388-395 - PubMed
  13. Gait Posture. 2015 Jun;42(1):91-5 - PubMed
  14. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jul;44(7):1325-34 - PubMed
  15. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9):1635-41 - PubMed
  16. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e017379 - PubMed
  17. Sports Med. 2019 Jul;49(7):1095-1115 - PubMed
  18. J Biomech. 2016 Feb 8;49(3):479-83 - PubMed
  19. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Apr;46(4):300-11 - PubMed
  20. J Biomech. 2017 Jul 26;60:248-252 - PubMed
  21. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210000 - PubMed
  22. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;50(8):450-7 - PubMed
  23. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;49(20):1290-4 - PubMed
  24. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Dec;48(12):1503-10 - PubMed
  25. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869 - PubMed
  26. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Dec;21(12):2895-900 - PubMed
  27. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Mar;43(3):159-62 - PubMed
  28. Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 30;8(1):17496 - PubMed
  29. Inj Epidemiol. 2020 Apr 1;7(1):10 - PubMed
  30. J Athl Train. 2020 Dec 1;55(12):1215-1223 - PubMed
  31. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(14):887-92 - PubMed
  32. J Biomech. 1991;24(12):1095-105 - PubMed
  33. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Dec;41(12):914-9 - PubMed
  34. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(5):384-92 - PubMed
  35. Nature. 2010 Jan 28;463(7280):531-5 - PubMed
  36. Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Jul;21(7):985-993 - PubMed
  37. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):473-480 - PubMed
  38. J Biomech. 1990;23 Suppl 1:65-78 - PubMed

Publication Types