Display options
Cite
Kilwinger F, Mugambi S, Manners R, et al. Characterizing cassava farmer typologies and their seed sourcing practices to explore opportunities for economically sustainable seed business models in Rwanda. Outlook Agric. 2021;50(4):441-454doi: 10.1177/00307270211045408.
Kilwinger, F., Mugambi, S., Manners, R., Schut, M., Tumwegamire, S., Nduwumuremyi, A., Bambara, S., Paauwe, M., & Almekinders, C. (2021). Characterizing cassava farmer typologies and their seed sourcing practices to explore opportunities for economically sustainable seed business models in Rwanda. Outlook on agriculture, 50(4), 441-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270211045408
Kilwinger, Fleur, et al. "Characterizing cassava farmer typologies and their seed sourcing practices to explore opportunities for economically sustainable seed business models in Rwanda." Outlook on agriculture vol. 50,4 (2021): 441-454. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270211045408
Kilwinger F, Mugambi S, Manners R, Schut M, Tumwegamire S, Nduwumuremyi A, Bambara S, Paauwe M, Almekinders C. Characterizing cassava farmer typologies and their seed sourcing practices to explore opportunities for economically sustainable seed business models in Rwanda. Outlook Agric. 2021 Dec;50(4):441-454. doi: 10.1177/00307270211045408. Epub 2021 Nov 30. PMID: 34866657; PMCID: PMC8637389.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Outlook Agric. 2021 Dec;50(4):441-454. doi: 10.1177/00307270211045408. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

Characterizing cassava farmer typologies and their seed sourcing practices to explore opportunities for economically sustainable seed business models in Rwanda.

Outlook on agriculture

Fleur Kilwinger, Samuel Mugambi, Rhys Manners, Marc Schut, Silver Tumwegamire, Athanase Nduwumuremyi, Sylvie Bambara, Marthe Paauwe, Conny Almekinders

Affiliations

  1. Knowledge, Technology and Innovation (KTI), Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  2. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Rwanda.
  3. Rwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB), Rwanda.
  4. SPARK, Rwanda.

PMID: 34866657 PMCID: PMC8637389 DOI: 10.1177/00307270211045408

Abstract

The overdependency on local cassava varieties and informal seed sources by farmers in Rwanda has contributed to the spread of cassava viral diseases. The use of improved planting materials made available through formal seed sources, that assure seed quality, is one way to prevent future disease outbreaks. In order to increase the availability of, and farmers access to, such materials there is increasing interest to develop seed business models. This study aims to understand seed sourcing practices of different farm typologies to inform the development of tailored seed business models. A total of 390 farmers were interviewed and the collected data was analyzed into clusters, resulting in seven farm typologies. Seed sourcing strategies, seed replacement dynamics and purchasing behavior of these typologies were explored via a seed tracing study. We find that more commercial oriented farmers have better access to formal seed sources. Nevertheless, the majority of farmers in all typologies accessed new varieties and quality cassava seed via informal channels. At both formal and informal sources, cash investments in seed were mainly made by the categories of better-off farmers, and were one-time investments to acquire a new variety. Based on farmers current seed sourcing practices, clarifications on the differences between farmers and their willingness-to-pay, the roles of seed degeneration, cost-benefit analysis, value propositions and profit formulas seem important requirements for the further development of viable cassava seed business models. We conclude that tailoring seed business models can have a high potential as it acknowledges differences among farmers, but that careful coordination is needed to ensure that one approach or intervention does not contrast with and/or undermine the others.

© The Author(s) 2021.

Keywords: Seed-sourcing strategies; adoption; manihot esculenta; seed tracing; tailored approaches

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Outlook Agric. 2020 Mar;49(1):29-38 - PubMed
  2. Outlook Agric. 2020 Jun;49(2):119-132 - PubMed
  3. Agric Syst. 2018 Jan;159:57-68 - PubMed
  4. J Gen Virol. 2015 May;96(Pt 5):956-68 - PubMed
  5. Plant Dis. 2007 Jan;91(1):24-29 - PubMed
  6. Int Aff. 2000;76(2):265-81 - PubMed
  7. Phytopathology. 2017 Oct;107(10):1123-1135 - PubMed
  8. Food Secur. 2018;10:351-368 - PubMed
  9. Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 23;12(1):4505 - PubMed
  10. Plant Dis. 2019 Oct;103(10):2652-2664 - PubMed
  11. Virus Res. 2011 Aug;159(2):161-70 - PubMed
  12. Breed Sci. 2016 Sep;66(4):560-571 - PubMed
  13. Food Secur. 2017;9:595-610 - PubMed
  14. PLoS One. 2018 May 15;13(5):e0194757 - PubMed

Publication Types