Display options
Share it on

Arch Rheumatol. 2021 Jan 21;36(3):335-340. doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2021.8192. eCollection 2021 Sep.

The mitral valve prolapse frequency in healthy females with generalized joint hypermobility: A case-control study.

Archives of rheumatology

Hande Özdemir, Filiz Tuna, Meryem Aktoz, Nurettin Taştekin, Derya Demirbağ Kabayel

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Uzunköprü State Hospital, Edirne, Turkey.
  2. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
  3. Department of Cardiology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.

PMID: 34870164 PMCID: PMC8612490 DOI: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2021.8192

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of mitral valve prolapse between healthy females with generalized joint hypermobility and healthy controls.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional, controlled study included female individuals with generalized joint hypermobility (n=39, mean age: 20.5±1.1 years; range, 19 to 23 years) and healthy controls (n=42, mean age: 20.6±1.2 years; range, 18 to 23 years) between July 2017 and November 2017. The generalized joint hypermobility consisted of women with a Beighton score of ≥4, while the control group consisted of women with a Beighton score of ≤3. Echocardiography was performed to all participants. Mitral valve prolapse was defined as having single or bileaflet prolapse of at least 2 mm beyond the long-axis annular plane with or without mitral leaflet thickening.

RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the age, height, body weight, and body mass index between the groups (p>0.05). The median Beighton score was 5 in the generalized joint hypermobility group and 2 in the control group. No mitral valve prolapse was detected in those with generalized joint hypermobility, while non-classical mitral valve prolapse was observed in one participant in the control group, indicating no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that the frequency of mitral valve prolapse is comparable between the women with generalized joint hypermobility and healthy controls. Based on these results, routine assessment of mitral valve prolapse is not recommended in this population.

Copyright © 2021, Turkish League Against Rheumatism.

Keywords: Echocardiography; heart valve disease; joint laxity; women

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Connect Tissue Res. 2021 Mar;62(2):215-225 - PubMed
  2. J Rheumatol. 2000 Jul;27(7):1777-9 - PubMed
  3. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Sep;23(9):1053-6 - PubMed
  4. Lancet. 2005 Feb 5-11;365(9458):507-18 - PubMed
  5. Biochem J. 1984 Apr 15;219(2):451-60 - PubMed
  6. J La State Med Soc. 1998 Feb;150(2):92-6 - PubMed
  7. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017 Dec;29(6):640-649 - PubMed
  8. Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Apr;35(4):1041-4 - PubMed
  9. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017 Mar;175(1):148-157 - PubMed
  10. Clin Rheumatol. 1988 Mar;7(1):69-73 - PubMed
  11. J Pediatr. 2011 May;158(5):826-830.e1 - PubMed
  12. Ann Rheum Dis. 1982 Aug;41(4):352-4 - PubMed
  13. Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Sep;35(9):861-6 - PubMed
  14. Ann Rheum Dis. 1983 Feb;42(1):54-5 - PubMed
  15. Br Heart J. 1985 Nov;54(5):501-8 - PubMed
  16. Jpn Heart J. 2004 May;45(3):447-60 - PubMed
  17. Br Heart J. 1985 Apr;53(4):353-62 - PubMed
  18. Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Apr;35(4):1029-39 - PubMed
  19. Ann Rheum Dis. 1973 Sep;32(5):413-8 - PubMed
  20. Circulation. 2014 May 27;129(21):2158-70 - PubMed
  21. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Oct 1;106(7):1048-53 - PubMed
  22. Ann Rheum Dis. 1981 Dec;40(6):541-6 - PubMed

Publication Types