Display options
Share it on

Psychophysiology. 2021 Nov 24;e13972. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13972. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

Modeling electrophysiological measures of decision-making and performance monitoring in neurotypical children engaging in a speeded flanker task.

Psychophysiology

Mei-Heng Lin, Patricia L Davies, Brittany K Taylor, Mark A Prince, William J Gavin

Affiliations

  1. Department of Occupational Therapy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
  2. Department of Molecular, Cellular & Integrative Neurosciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
  3. Department of Human Development & Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
  4. Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

PMID: 34818441 DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13972

Abstract

This study aims to use structural equation modeling (SEM) to investigate the role of error processing in behavioral adaptation in children by testing relationships between error-related and stimulus-related event-related potentials (ERPs) obtained from two sessions of a speeded Eriksen flanker task. First, path models of averaged ERP components and mean response times (N1 → P2 → N2 → P3 → RTs) while controlling for trait effects, age, and sex, on each was examined separately for correct and incorrect trials from each session. While the model demonstrated acceptable fit statistics, the four models yielded diverse results. Next, path models for correct and incorrect trials were tested using latent variables defined by factoring together respective measures of ERP component amplitudes from each session. Comparison of correct and incorrect models revealed significant differences in the relationships between the successive measures of neural processing after controlling for trait effects. Moreover, latent variable models controlling for both trait and session-specific state variables yielded excellent model fit while models without session-specific state variables did not. In the final model, the error-related neural activity (i.e., the ERN and Pe) from incorrect trials was found to significantly relate to the stream of neural processes contributing to trials with the correct behavior. Importantly, the relationship between RT and error detection in the final model signifies a brain-and-behavior feedback loop. These findings provided empirical evidence that supports the adaptive orienting theory of error processing by demonstrating how the neural signals of error processing influence behavioral adaptations that facilitate correct behavioral performance.

© 2021 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Keywords: error-processing; error-related negativity (ERN); event-related potentials (ERPs); post-error slowing; structural equation modeling

References

  1. American Electroencephalographic Society. (1994). Guideline thirteen: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 11(1), 111-113. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199401000-00014 - PubMed
  2. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624-652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624 - PubMed
  3. Brion, M., Pitel, A. L., & D'Hondt, F. (2016). New perspectives in the exploration of Korsakoff's syndrome: The usefulness of neurophysiological markers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 168. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00168 - PubMed
  4. Brooker, R. J., Bates, J. E., Buss, K. A., Canen, M. J., Dennis-Tiwary, T. A., Gatzke-Kopp, L. M., Hoyniak, C., Klein, D. N., Kujawa, A., Lahat, A., Lamm, C., Moser, J. S., Petersen, I. T., Tang, A., Woltering, S., & Schmidt, L. A. (2020). Conducting event-related potential (ERP) research with young children. Journal of Psychophysiology, 34(3), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000243 - PubMed
  5. Burle, B., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Spieser, L., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2016). Preventing (impulsive) errors: Electrophysiological evidence for online inhibitory control over incorrect responses. Psychophysiology, 53(7), 1008-1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12647 - PubMed
  6. Buzzell, G. A., Beatty, P. J., Paquette, N. A., Roberts, D. M., & McDonald, C. G. (2017). Error-induced blindness: Error detection leads to impaired sensory processing and lower accuracy at short response-stimulus intervals. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(11), 2895-2903. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1202-16.2017 - PubMed
  7. Coles, M. G. H., Scheffers, M. K., & Holroyd, C. B. (2001). Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing. Biological Psychology, 56(3), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00076-X - PubMed
  8. Dambacher, M., & Hubner, R. (2013). Investigating the speed-accuracy trade-off: Better use deadlines or response signals? Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 702-717. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0303-0 - PubMed
  9. Danielmeier, C., Eichele, T., Forstmann, B. U., Tittgemeyer, M., & Ullsperger, M. (2011). Posterior medial frontal cortex activity predicts post-error adaptations in task-related visual and motor areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(5), 1780-1789. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4299-10.2011 - PubMed
  10. Danielmeier, C., & Ullsperger, M. (2011). Post-error adjustments. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00233 - PubMed
  11. Davies, P. L., & Gavin, W. J. (2007). Validating the diagnosis of sensory processing disorders using EEG technology. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), 176-189. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.61.2.176 - PubMed
  12. Davies, P. L., Segalowitz, S. J., Dywan, J., & Pailing, P. E. (2001). Error-negativity and positivity as they relate to other ERP indices of attentional control and stimulus processing. Biological Psychology, 56(3), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00080-1 - PubMed
  13. Davies, P. L., Segalowitz, S. J., & Gavin, W. J. (2004). Development of response-monitoring ERPs in 7- to 25-year-olds. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25(3), 355-376. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2503_6 - PubMed
  14. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(3), 355-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00058027 - PubMed
  15. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267 - PubMed
  16. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1991). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78(6), 447-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(91)90062-9 - PubMed
  17. Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Christ, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (2000). ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: A tutorial. Biological Psychology, 51(2-3), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00031-9 - PubMed
  18. Foti, D., Kotov, R., & Hajcak, G. (2013). Psychometric considerations in using error-related brain activity as a biomarker in psychotic disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(2), 520-531. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032618 - PubMed
  19. Gavin, W. J. (2013). Brainwaves Lab PeakPicker. A MATLAB program created in the Brainwaves Research Laboratory at Colorado State University. Fort Collins, Colorado. - PubMed
  20. Gavin, W. J., & Davies, P. L. (2008). Obtaining reliable psychophysiological data with child participants: Methodological considerations. In L. A. Schmidt & S. J. Segalowitz (Eds.), Developmental Psychophysiology: Theory, Systems, and Methods (pp. 424-447). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499791.016 - PubMed
  21. Gavin, W. J., Lin, M. H., & Davies, P. L. (2019). Developmental trends of performance monitoring measures in 7- to 25-year-olds: Unraveling the complex nature of brain measures. Psychophysiology, 56(7), e13365. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13365 - PubMed
  22. Gehring, W. J., & Fencsik, D. E. (2001). Functions of the medial frontal cortex in the processing of conflict and errors. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(23), 9430-9437. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-23-09430.2001 - PubMed
  23. Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4(6), 385-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x - PubMed
  24. Gehring, W. J., Liu, Y., Orr, J. M., & Carp, J. (2012). The error-related negativity (ERN/Ne). In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 231-291). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.013.0120 - PubMed
  25. Hagemann, D., & Naumann, E. (2009). States vs. traits: An integrated model for the test of Eysenck's arousal/arousability hypothesis. Journal of Individual Differences, 30(2), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.30.2.87 - PubMed
  26. Holm, A., Ranta-aho, P. O., Sallinen, M., Karjalainen, P. A., & Muller, K. (2006). Relationship of P300 single-trial responses with reaction time and preceding stimulus sequence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61(2), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.015 - PubMed
  27. Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109(4), 679-709. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.679 - PubMed
  28. Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. SAGE Publications Inc. - PubMed
  29. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 - PubMed
  30. Hughes, G., & Yeung, N. (2011). Dissociable correlates of response conflict and error awareness in error-related brain activity. Neuropsychologia, 49(3), 405-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.036 - PubMed
  31. Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003 - PubMed
  32. Iannaccone, R., Hauser, T., Staempfli, P., Walitaz, S., Brandeis, D., & Brem, S. (2015). Conflict monitoring and error processing: New insights from simultaneous EEG-fMRI. NeuroImage, 105, 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.028 - PubMed
  33. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. - PubMed
  34. Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 38(3), 557-577. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201990559 - PubMed
  35. Lackner, C. L., Santesso, D. L., Dywan, J., Wade, T. J., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2013). Electrocortical indices of selective attention predict adolescent executive functioning. Biological Psychology, 93(2), 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.03.001 - PubMed
  36. Laming, D. R. J. (1968). Information theory of choice-reaction times. Academic Press. - PubMed
  37. Lin, M.-H., Davies, P. L., Stephens, J., & Gavin, W. J. (2020). Test-retest reliability of electroencephalographic measures of performance monitoring in children and adults. Developmental Neuropsychology, 45(6), 341-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2020.1833208 - PubMed
  38. Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. The MIT Press. - PubMed
  39. Luck, S. J., & Girelli, M. (1998). Electrophysiological approaches to the study of selective attention in the human brain. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 71-94). The MIT Press. - PubMed
  40. Maruyama, G. (1997). Basics of structural equation modeling. SAGE Publications Inc. - PubMed
  41. Meyer, A. (2017). A biomarker of anxiety in children and adolescents: A review focusing on the error-related negativity (ERN) and anxiety across development. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.08.001 - PubMed
  42. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). - PubMed
  43. Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Opstal, F. V., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Post-error slowing: An orienting account. Cognition, 111(2), 275-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.002 - PubMed
  44. Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859-866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x - PubMed
  45. Polich, J. (1993). Cognitive brain potentials. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(6), 175-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10769728 - PubMed
  46. Polich, J. (2003). Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b. In J. Polich (Ed.), Detection of change: Event-related potential and fMRI findings (pp. 83-98). Kluwer Academic Publishers. - PubMed
  47. Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128-2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019 - PubMed
  48. Ramchurn, A., de Fockert, J. W., Mason, L., Darling, S., & Bunce, D. (2014). Intraindividual reaction time variability affects P300 amplitude rather than latency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 557. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00557 - PubMed
  49. Richardson, C., Anderson, M., Reid, C. L., & Fox, A. M. (2011). Neural indicators of error processing and intraindividual variability in reaction time in 7 and 9 year-olds. Developmental Psychobiology, 53(3), 256-265. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20518 - PubMed
  50. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention & performance (Vol. XIX, pp. 494-519). Oxford University Press. - PubMed
  51. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ramautar, J. R., & Wijnen, J. G. (2009). To P(E) or not to P(E): A P3-like ERP component reflecting the processing of response errors. Psychophysiology, 46(3), 531-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00790.x - PubMed
  52. Riesel, A., Weinberg, A., Endrass, T., Meyer, A., & Hajcak, G. (2013). The ERN is the ERN is the ERN? Convergent validity of error-related brain activity across different tasks. Biological Psychology, 93(3), 377-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.007 - PubMed
  53. Rosch, K. S., & Hawk, L. W. (2013). The effects of performance-based rewards on neurophysiological correlates of stimulus, error, and feedback processing in children with ADHD. Psychophysiology, 50(11), 1157-1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12127 - PubMed
  54. Santesso, D. L., Drmic, I. E., Jetha, M. K., Bryson, S. E., Goldberg, J. O., Hall, G. B., Mathewson, K. J., Segalowitz, S. J., & Schmidt, L. A. (2011). An event-related source localization study of response monitoring and social impairments in autism spectrum disorder. Psychophysiology, 48(2), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01056.x - PubMed
  55. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. - PubMed
  56. Segalowitz, S. J. (1996). EYEREG.EXE program for epoch-based eye-channel correction of ERPs. Brock University. - PubMed
  57. Shalgi, S., O'Connell, R. G., Deouell, L. Y., & Robertson, I. H. (2007). Absent minded but accurate: Delaying responses increases accuracy but decreases error awareness. Experimental Brain Research, 182(1), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1054-5 - PubMed
  58. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127-190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127 - PubMed
  59. Steinhauser, M., & Yeung, N. (2012). Error awareness as evidence accumulation: Effects of speed-accuracy trade-off on error signaling. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00240 - PubMed
  60. Swick, D., & Turken, A. U. (2002). Dissociation between conflict detection and error monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(25), 16354-16359. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.252521499 - PubMed
  61. Taylor, B. K., Gavin, W. J., Grimm, K. J., Prince, M. A., Lin, M. H., & Davies, P. L. (2019). Towards a unified model of event-related potentials as phases of stimulus-to-response processing. Neuropsychologia, 132, 107128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107128 - PubMed
  62. Tsai, L. L., Young, H. Y., Hsieh, S., & Lee, C. S. (2005). Impairment of error monitoring following sleep deprivation. Sleep, 28(6), 707-713. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/28.6.707 - PubMed
  63. Ullsperger, M., & Danielmeier, C. (2016). Reducing speed and sight: How adaptive is post-error slowing? Neuron, 89(3), 430-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.035 - PubMed
  64. van Driel, O. P. (1978). On various causes of improper solutions in maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 43(2), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293865 - PubMed
  65. van Veen, V., & Carter, C. (2002). The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiology & Behavior, 77(4-5), 477-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00930-7 - PubMed
  66. Wessel, J. R. (2018). An adaptive orienting theory of error processing. Psychophysiology, 55(3), e13041. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13041 - PubMed
  67. Wessel, J. R., Danielmeier, C., Morton, J. B., & Ullsperger, M. (2012). Surprise and error: Common neuronal architecture for the processing of errors and novelty. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(22), 7528-7537. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6352-11.2012 - PubMed
  68. Westland, J. C. (2015). Structural equation models: From paths to networks. Springer International Publishing. - PubMed
  69. Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 931-959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.931 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support