Display options
Cite
Saleh HK, Folkeard P, Van Eeckhoutte M, et al. Premium versus entry-level hearing aids: using group concept mapping to investigate the drivers of preference. Int J Audiol. 2021;1-15doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.2009923.
Saleh, H. K., Folkeard, P., Van Eeckhoutte, M., & Scollie, S. (2021). Premium versus entry-level hearing aids: using group concept mapping to investigate the drivers of preference. International journal of audiology, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2021.2009923
Saleh, Hasan K, et al. "Premium versus entry-level hearing aids: using group concept mapping to investigate the drivers of preference." International journal of audiology vol. (2021): 1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2021.2009923
Saleh HK, Folkeard P, Van Eeckhoutte M, Scollie S. Premium versus entry-level hearing aids: using group concept mapping to investigate the drivers of preference. Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec 09;1-15. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.2009923. Epub 2021 Dec 09. PMID: 34883040.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec 09;1-15. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.2009923. Epub 2021 Dec 09.

Premium versus entry-level hearing aids: using group concept mapping to investigate the drivers of preference.

International journal of audiology

Hasan K Saleh, Paula Folkeard, Maaike Van Eeckhoutte, Susan Scollie

Affiliations

  1. Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
  2. National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
  3. Hearing Systems, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens, Lyngby.
  4. Ear, Nose, Throat (ENT) & Audiology Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
  5. Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

PMID: 34883040 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.2009923

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the difference in outcome measures and drivers of user preference between premium and entry-level hearing aids using group concept mapping.

DESIGN: A single-blind crossover trial was conducted. Aided behavioural outcomes measured were loudness rating, speech/consonant recognition, and speech quality. Preference between hearing aids was measured with a 7-point Likert scale. Group concept mapping was utilised to investigate preference results. Participants generated statements based on what influenced their preferences. These were sorted into categories with underlying themes. Participants rated each statement on a 5-point Likert scale of importance.

STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty-three adult participants (mean: 62.4 years; range: 24-78) with mild to moderately severe bilateral SNHL (PTA

RESULTS: A total of 83 unique statements and nine distinct clusters, with underlying themes driving preference, were generated. Clusters that differed significantly in importance between entry-level and premium hearing aid choosers were: Having access to smartphone application-based user-controlled settings, the ability to stream calls and music, and convenience features such as accessory compatibility.

CONCLUSION: This study has identified non-signal-processing factors which significantly influenced preference for a premium hearing aid over an entry-level hearing aid, indicating the importance of these features as drivers of user preference.

Keywords: Hearing aids; concept mapping; drivers of preference; hearing aid product profile; hearing aid technology levels; hearing aid user preference; non-signal-processing features

Publication Types