Display options
Share it on

Appl Ergon. 2021 Dec 08;100:103663. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103663. Epub 2021 Dec 08.

In contrast to slip-resistant shoes, fluid drainage capacity explains friction performance across shoes that are not slip-resistant.

Applied ergonomics

Emily E Meehan, Natasa Vidic, Kurt E Beschorner

Affiliations

  1. Bioengineering Department, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 O'Hara St. #302, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
  2. Industrial Engineering Department, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 O'Hara St. #1007, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
  3. Bioengineering Department, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 O'Hara St. #302, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].

PMID: 34894586 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103663

Abstract

Slip and fall injuries can be prevented through footwear with good friction performance. The factors that contribute to friction in non-slip-resistant (NSR) shoes are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to determine whether predictive models for slip-resistant (SR) shoes also apply to NSR shoes. This study also quantified the contributions of under-shoe fluid drainage to friction in NSR shoes. The coefficient of friction (ACOF) and under-shoe fluid pressures of fifteen NSR shoes were measured. A previously developed ACOF prediction model based on measurable outsole features was applied to the NSR shoes. The previously developed model did not apply well (in trends, as indicated by interaction effects involving SR/NSR classification, or in magnitude, p < 0.001) to NSR shoes. Instead, an increase in the fluid pressures were associated with a reduction in ACOF (p < 0.001). This study demonstrates that fluid pressures dominate performance in NSR shoes in contrast to SR shoes.

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: And falls; Coefficient of friction; Footwear; Slips; Trips

Publication Types