Display options
Cite
Winsberg E, Brennan J, Surprenant C. This Paper Attacks a Strawman but the Strawman Wins: A reply to van Basshuysen and White. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2021;31(4):429-446doi: 10.1353/ken.2021.0029.
Winsberg, E., Brennan, J., & Surprenant, C. (2021). This Paper Attacks a Strawman but the Strawman Wins: A reply to van Basshuysen and White. Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal, 31(4), 429-446. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2021.0029
Winsberg, Eric, et al. "This Paper Attacks a Strawman but the Strawman Wins: A reply to van Basshuysen and White." Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal vol. 31,4 (2021): 429-446. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2021.0029
Winsberg E, Brennan J, Surprenant C. This Paper Attacks a Strawman but the Strawman Wins: A reply to van Basshuysen and White. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2021;31(4):429-446. doi: 10.1353/ken.2021.0029. PMID: 34897119.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2021;31(4):429-446. doi: 10.1353/ken.2021.0029.

This Paper Attacks a Strawman but the Strawman Wins: A reply to van Basshuysen and White.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal

Eric Winsberg, Jason Brennan, Chris Surprenant

PMID: 34897119 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2021.0029

Abstract

We reply to van Basshuysen and White's criticism of our paper. We argue that they have misconstrued what our original claims were. Nevertheless, we maintain that their arguments against the position they incorrectly attribute to us fail.

Publication Types