Display options
Cite
Flower J, Estep A, James K, et al. An experimental evaluation of the effect of escape gaps on the quantity, diversity, and size of fish caught in traps in Montserrat. PLoS One. 2021;16(12):e0261119doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261119.
Flower, J., Estep, A., James, K., Ramdeen, R., Runge, C. A., Thomas, L., & Lester, S. E. (2021). An experimental evaluation of the effect of escape gaps on the quantity, diversity, and size of fish caught in traps in Montserrat. PloS one, 16(12), e0261119. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261119
Flower, Jason, et al. "An experimental evaluation of the effect of escape gaps on the quantity, diversity, and size of fish caught in traps in Montserrat." PloS one vol. 16,12 (2021): e0261119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261119
Flower J, Estep A, James K, Ramdeen R, Runge CA, Thomas L, Lester SE. An experimental evaluation of the effect of escape gaps on the quantity, diversity, and size of fish caught in traps in Montserrat. PLoS One. 2021 Dec 10;16(12):e0261119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261119. eCollection 2021. PMID: 34890426; PMCID: PMC8664196.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

PLoS One. 2021 Dec 10;16(12):e0261119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261119. eCollection 2021.

An experimental evaluation of the effect of escape gaps on the quantity, diversity, and size of fish caught in traps in Montserrat.

PloS one

Jason Flower, Andy Estep, Keinan James, Robin Ramdeen, Claire A Runge, Lennon Thomas, Sarah E Lester

Affiliations

  1. Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America.
  2. Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America.
  3. Environmental Market Solutions Lab, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America.
  4. Waitt Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
  5. Youth Apprenticeship Program, Ministry of Education, Youth Affairs & Sports, Brades, Montserrat.
  6. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
  7. Department of Geography, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States of America.

PMID: 34890426 PMCID: PMC8664196 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261119

Abstract

Coral reef fisheries are vital to the livelihoods of millions of people worldwide but are challenging to manage due to the high diversity of fish species that are harvested and the multiple types of fishing gear that are used. Fish traps are a commonly used gear in reef fisheries in the Caribbean and other regions, but they have poor selectivity and frequently capture juvenile fish, impacting the sustainability of the fishery. One option for managing trap fisheries is the addition of escape gaps, which allow small fish to escape. We compared catches of traps with and without two 2.5 cm (1 inch) escape gaps on the Caribbean island of Montserrat. No significant differences were found in the mean fish length, total fish biomass, number of fish, fish species richness, and Shannon diversity index between hauls of the two trap designs, though traps with escape gaps did catch larger proportions of wider-bodied fish and smaller proportions of narrow-bodied fish. Furthermore, traps with gaps caught a smaller proportion of small-sized fish and fewer immature fish (though differences were not statistically significant). Linear mixed effect models predict that soak time (the length of time between trap hauls) increases the mean catch length, total catch biomass and total number of species in the catch. The relatively modest evidence for the effect of the gaps on catch may be explained by the long soak times used, which could have allowed most smaller-sized fish to escape or be consumed by larger individuals before hauling in both traps with and without escape gaps. Despite the small differences detected in this study, escape gaps may still offer one of the best options for improving sustainability of catches from fish traps, but larger escape gaps should be tested with varying soak times to determine optimum escape gap size.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18286-93 - PubMed
  2. Curr Biol. 2007 Apr 3;17(7):655-8 - PubMed
  3. Conserv Biol. 2018 Feb;32(1):159-170 - PubMed
  4. Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 21;6:19671 - PubMed
  5. J Fish Biol. 2012 Oct;81(5):1611-25 - PubMed
  6. Curr Biol. 2014 May 5;24(9):1000-5 - PubMed
  7. Science. 2006 Jan 6;311(5757):98-101 - PubMed
  8. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 19;8(6):e65397 - PubMed
  9. Ecology. 2016 Sep;97(9):2447-2457 - PubMed
  10. PeerJ. 2018 May 23;6:e4794 - PubMed
  11. PLoS One. 2010 Jan 11;5(1):e8657 - PubMed

Publication Types