Display options
Cite
Mugenyi L, Mijumbi A, Nanfuka M, et al. Capacity of community advisory boards for effective engagement in clinical research: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Ethics. 2021;22(1):165doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00733-0.
Mugenyi, L., Mijumbi, A., Nanfuka, M., Agaba, C., Kaliba, F., Semakula, I. S., Nazziwa, W. B., & Ochieng, J. (2021). Capacity of community advisory boards for effective engagement in clinical research: a mixed methods study. BMC medical ethics, 22(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00733-0
Mugenyi, Levicatus, et al. "Capacity of community advisory boards for effective engagement in clinical research: a mixed methods study." BMC medical ethics vol. 22,1 (2021): 165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00733-0
Mugenyi L, Mijumbi A, Nanfuka M, Agaba C, Kaliba F, Semakula IS, Nazziwa WB, Ochieng J. Capacity of community advisory boards for effective engagement in clinical research: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Dec 15;22(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00733-0. PMID: 34911524.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Dec 15;22(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00733-0.

Capacity of community advisory boards for effective engagement in clinical research: a mixed methods study.

BMC medical ethics

Levicatus Mugenyi, Andrew Mijumbi, Mastula Nanfuka, Collins Agaba, Fedress Kaliba, Irene Seryazi Semakula, Winfred Badanga Nazziwa, Joseph Ochieng

Affiliations

  1. The AIDS Support Organization, Kampala, Uganda. [email protected].
  2. The AIDS Support Organization, Kampala, Uganda.
  3. Makerere University-John Hopkins University Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
  4. Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, Kampala, Uganda.
  5. College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

PMID: 34911524 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00733-0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community engagement is a key component in health research. One of the ways health researchers ensure community engagement is through Community Advisory Boards (CABs). The capacity of CABs to properly perform their role in clinical research has not been well described in many resource limited settings. In this study, we assessed the capacity of CABs for effective community engagement in Uganda.

METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional study with mixed methods. We used structured questionnaires and key informant interviews (KII) to collect data from CAB members, trial investigators, and community liaison officers. For quantitative data, we used descriptive statistics while for qualitative data we used content analysis.

RESULTS: Seventy three CAB members were interviewed using structured questionnaires; 58.9% males, median age 49 years (IQR 24-70), 71.2% had attained tertiary education, 42.5% never attended any research ethics training, only 26% had a training in human subject protection, 30.1% had training in health research, 50.7% never attended any training about the role of CABs, and 72.6% had no guidelines for their operation. On the qualitative aspect, 24 KIIs cited CAB members to have some skills and ability to understand and review study documents, offer guidance on community norms and expectations and give valuable feedback to the investigators. However, challenges like limited resources, lack of independence and guidelines, and knowledge gaps about research ethics were cited as hindrances of CABs capacity.

CONCLUSION: Though CABs have some capacity to perform their role in the Ugandan setting, their functionality is limited by lack of resources to facilitate their work, lack of independence, lack of guidelines for their operations and limited knowledge regarding issues of research ethics and protection of the rights of trial participants.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Keywords: CABs; Capacity; Community engagement; Knowledge; Research communities; Research ethics; Training

References

  1. Mlambo CK, Vernooij E, Geut R, Vrolings E, Shongwe B, Jiwan S, et al. Experiences from a community advisory Board in the Implementation of early access to ART for all in Eswatini: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20(1):1–11. - PubMed
  2. Newman SD, Andrews JO, Magwood GS, Jenkins C, Cox MJ, Williamson DC. Community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: A synthesis of best processes. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011. - PubMed
  3. Lwin KM, Cheah PY, Cheah PK, White NJ, Day NPJ, Nosten F, et al. Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research : the case of the Thai-Myanmar border. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15(1):1–10. - PubMed
  4. Kresge KJ. Deciphering AIDS vaccines. An anthology of VAXand IAVI report articles explaining key concepts in AIDS vaccine research and clinical trials. 2006. http://www.iavireport.org/. - PubMed
  5. Reddy P, Sifunda S, James S, Naidoo N, Buchanan D. The role of community advisory boards in health research: Divergent views in the South African experience. Sahara J. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/17290376.2010.9724963 . - PubMed
  6. NIMH Multisite HIV/STD Prevention Trial for African American Couples. The role of Community Advisory Boards (CABs) in Project Eban. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2853920/. - PubMed
  7. Hailu A, Faso B, Ravinetto R, Unit CT. Clinical trials in practice: How to achieve the best protection of the study subjects? 2011;1–11. - PubMed
  8. Lawrence C, Stewart K. The challenge of community representation : lessons from six HIV clinical the challenge of community representation : lessons from six HIV Clinical Research Community Advisory Boards in Uganda. 2018. - PubMed
  9. Nyirenda D, Sariola S, Gooding K, Phiri M, Sambakunsi R, Moyo E, et al. ‘We are the eyes and ears of researchers and community’: Understanding the role of community advisory groups in representing researchers and communities in Malawi. Dev World Bioeth. 2018;18(4):420–8. - PubMed
  10. Matthews AK, Anderson EE, Willis M, Castillo A, Choure W. A Community Engagement Advisory Board as a strategy to improve research engagement and build institutional capacity for community-engaged research. J Clin Transl Sci. 2018;2:66. - PubMed
  11. Zhao Y, Fitzpatrick T, Wan B, Day S, Mathews A, Tucker JD. Forming and implementing community advisory boards in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20:1. - PubMed
  12. Mwinga A, Moodley K. Engaging with Community Advisory Boards (CABs) in Lusaka Zambia: perspectives from the research team and CAB members. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16(1):1–11. - PubMed
  13. UNSCT. National Guidelines for research involving humans as research participants. Kampala; 2014. https://www.uncst.go.ug/guidelines-and-forms/. - PubMed
  14. National Drug Authority. Clinical Trials authorized in Uganda from January 2016—17th December 2018. https://www.nda.or.ug/clinical-trials/. - PubMed
  15. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2015. - PubMed
  16. Dowling M. Atlas.ti (software). In: Given LM, editor. The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE Publications; 2008. p. 37. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n20. - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support