Display options
Share it on

J Appl Toxicol. 2021 Dec 19; doi: 10.1002/jat.4275. Epub 2021 Dec 19.

Improved performance of the SH test as an in vitro skin sensitization test with a new predictive model and decision tree.

Journal of applied toxicology : JAT

Noriyasu Imai, Midori Takeyoshi, Sakiko Aizawa, Mika Tsurumaki, Masaharu Kurosawa, Akemi Toyoda, Maki Sugiyama, Kaoru Kasahara, Shinichi Ogata, Takashi Omori, Morihiko Hirota

Affiliations

  1. Safety and Analytical Research Laboratories, KOSÉ Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  2. Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan.
  3. Frontier Research Laboratories, POLA Chemical Industries, Inc., Yokohama, Japan.
  4. Division of Biostatistics Department of Social/Community Medicine and Health Science, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
  5. Brand Value R&D Institute, Shiseido Co., Ltd., Yokohama, Japan.

PMID: 34927266 DOI: 10.1002/jat.4275

Abstract

Demands for the elimination and replacement of animal experiments for cosmetic safety assessment have increased in recent years. Evaluation of skin sensitization, however, is a critical issue in cosmetic safety assessment. The SH test is an in vitro skin sensitization test method that evaluates protein binding of chemical substances, which is an important event in skin sensitization. We previously verified the technical transferability and between-laboratory reproducibility of the SH test, a domestic test method for which no scientific research has been conducted, and improved the protocol, but also noted some unresolved issues. Therefore, in the present study, we successfully improved the operational efficiency and clarity of the final judgment of the SH test by (i) developing a new decision-making system that can make a final judgment without statistical processing, (ii) changing the statistical method, and (iii) evaluating and determining the maximum number of repetitions necessary for optimal efficiency. The improved SH test was verified by comparing it with existing test methods already adopted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The results of this study demonstrated excellent performance of the improved SH test, with high reproducibility, reliable predictability, and good operational efficiency. The predictive performance of the improved method does not differ significantly from that of the conventional method, although it is clearer and more efficient. Therefore, the results of the present improved method are consistent with those obtained using the conventional method, with higher efficiency.

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: 95% confidence interval; IATA for skin sensitization; SH test; alternative test method to animal experiment; between-laboratory reproducibility; in vitro skin sensitization test method; operational efficiency; prediction model; skin sensitization

References

  1. Altman, G. D., Machin, D., Bryant, N. T., & Gardner, J. M. (2000). Statistics with confidence (2nd ed.). MJB books. - PubMed
  2. Ashikaga, T., Yoshida, Y., Hirota, M., Yoneyama, K., Itagaki, H., Sakaguchi, H., Miyazawa, M., Ito, Y., Suzuki, H., & Toyoda, H. (2006). Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines: The human cell line activation test (h-CLAT). I. Optimization of the h-CLAT protocol. Toxicology in Vitro, 20, 767-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2005.10.012 - PubMed
  3. Council of the European Union and European Parliament. (2003). Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 27 February 2003 amending council directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the member states relating to cosmetic products. Official Journal of European Union, L66, 26-35. - PubMed
  4. European Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing. (2014). EURL ECVAM recommendation on the KeratinoSens™ assay for skin sensitisation testing. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788/52914 - PubMed
  5. Fujita, M., Yamamoto, Y., Tahara, H., Kasahara, T., Jimbo, Y., & Hioki, T. (2014). Development of a prediction method for skin sensitization using novel cysteine and lysine derivatives. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 70, 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2014.06.001 - PubMed
  6. Gerberick, G. F., Vassallo, J. D., Bailey, R. E., Chaney, J. G., Morrall, S. W., & Lepoittevin, J. P. (2004). Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens. Toxicological Sciences, 81, 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfh213 - PubMed
  7. Gerberick, G. F., Vassallo, J. D., Foertsch, L. M., Price, B. B., Chaney, J. G., & Lepoittevin, J. P. (2007). Quantification of chemical peptide reactivity for screening contact allergens: A classification tree model approach. Toxicological Sciences, 97, 417-427. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfm064 - PubMed
  8. Hemming, J. D. C., Hosford, M., & Shafer, M. M. (2019). Application of the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) to inorganic compounds: A case study of platinum species. Toxicology Research, 8, 802-814. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tx00242a - PubMed
  9. Hirota, M., Fukui, S., Okamoto, K., Kurotani, S., Imai, N., Fujishiro, M., Kyotani, D., Kato, Y., Kasahara, T., Fujita, M., Toyoda, A., Sekiya, D., Watanabe, S., Seto, H., Takenouchi, O., Ashikaga, T., & Miyazawa, M. (2015). Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 35, 1333-1347. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3105 - PubMed
  10. Hirota, M., Kouzuki, H., Ashikaga, T., Sono, S., Tsujita, K., Sasa, H., & Aiba, S. (2013). Artificial neural network analysis of data from multiple in vitro assays for prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals. Toxicology in Vitro, 27, 1233-1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2013.02.013 - PubMed
  11. Hirota, M., Motoyama, A., Suzuki, M., Yanagi, M., Kitagaki, M., Hagino, S., Itagaki, H., Sasa, H., Kagatani, S., & Aiba, S. (2010). Changes of cell-surface thiols and intracellular signaling in human monocytic cell line THP-1 treated with diphenylcyclopropenone. The Journal Toxicological Sciences, 35, 871-879. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.35.871 - PubMed
  12. Hirota, M., Suzuki, M., Hagino, S., Kagatani, S., Sasaki, Y., Aiba, S., & Itagaki, H. (2009). Modification of cell-surface thiols elicits activation of human monocytic cell line THP-1: Possible involvement in effect of haptens 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene and nickel sulfate. The Journal of Toxicological Sciences, 34, 139-150. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.34.139 - PubMed
  13. Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM). (1999). The murine local lymph lode assay: A test method for assessing the allergic contact dermatitis potential of chemicals/compounds, The results of an independent peer review evaluation coordinated by the interagency coordinating committee on the validation of alternative methods (ICCVAM) and the national toxicology program interagency center for the evaluation of alternative toxicological methods (NICEATM), NIH Publication No. 99-4494, Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. (available at https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov › docs › llna › llnarep) - PubMed
  14. Imai, N., Takeyoshi, M., Aizawa, S., Tsurumaki, M., Kurosawa, M., Toyoda, A., Sugiyama, M., Kasahara, K., Hirota, M., & Ogata, S. (2021). Enhancing between-facility reproducibility of the SH test as an in vitro skin sensitization test by the improved test method. The Journal of Toxicological Sciences, 46, 235-248. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.46.235 - PubMed
  15. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Pharmaceutical Safety and Environmental Health Bureau, Pharmaceutical Evaluation Division. (2018). Guidance on the Use of Combinations of in Vitro Skin Sensitization Assays in the Safety Assessment of Cosmetics and Quasi-Drugs (in Japanese). Ministry of Health, Laboure and Welfare. (available at https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000222425.pdf) - PubMed
  16. Natsch, A. (2010). The Nrf2-Keap1-ARE toxicity pathway as a cellular sensor for skin sensitizers--functional relevance and a hypothesis on innate reactions to skin sensitizers. Toxicological Sciences, 113, 284-292. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfp228 - PubMed
  17. Natsch, A., & Emter, R. (2008). Skin sensitizers induce antioxidant response element dependent genes: Application to the in vitro testing of the sensitization potential of chemicals. Toxicological Sciences, 102, 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfm259 - PubMed
  18. Natsch, A., Ryan, C. A., Foertsch, L., Emter, R., Jaworska, J., Gerberick, F., & Kern, P. (2013). A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 33, 1337-1352. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.2868 - PubMed
  19. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010). OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals. Skin sensitisation: local lymph node assay. In OECD Guideline for the Testing Chemicals, Guideline No.429. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. - PubMed
  20. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2012a). The adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitisation initiated by covalent binding to proteins. Part 1: Scientific evidence. In Series on Testing & Assessment, No.168. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. - PubMed
  21. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2012b). The adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitisation initiated by covalent binding to proteins. Part 2: Use of the AOP to develop chemical categories and integrated assessment and testing approaches. In Series on Testing & Assessment, No.168. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. - PubMed
  22. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2016a). Annex I: Case studies to the guidance document on the reporting of defined approaches and individual information sources to be used within integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA) for skin sensitisation. In OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications: Series on Testing & Assessment, No.256. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. - PubMed
  23. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2016b). Guidance document for the reporting of defined approaches and individual information sources to be used within integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA) for skin sensitisation. In OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications: Series on Testing & Assessment, No.256. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. - PubMed
  24. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2016c). Guidance document for the use of adverse outcome pathways in developing integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA). In OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications: Series on Testing & Assessment, No.260. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. - PubMed
  25. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018a). OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals. In vitro skin sensitisation assays addressing the key event on keratinocyte activation. In OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Guideline No. 442D. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. - PubMed
  26. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018b). OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals. In vitro skin sensitisation assays addressing the key event on activation of dendritic cells on the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitisation. In OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Guideline No. 442E. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. - PubMed
  27. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019a). Performance Standards for the assessment of proposed similar or modified in vitro skin sensitisation DPRA and ADRA test methods. In Series on Testing & Assessment, No.303. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. - PubMed
  28. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019b). OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals. Key-Event-Based Test Guideline for In Chemico Skin Sensitisation Assays Addressing the Adverse Outcome Pathway Key Event on Covalent Binding to Proteins. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Guideline No. 442C, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. - PubMed
  29. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019c). Validation study report of the amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA). In Series on Testing & Assessment, No.304. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. - PubMed
  30. Ramirez, T., Mehling, A., Kolle, S. N., Wruck, C. J., Teubner, W., Eltze, T., Aumann, A., Urbisch, D., Ravenzwaay, B., & Landsiedel, R. (2014). LuSens: A keratinocyte based ARE reporter gene assay for use in integrated testing strategies for skin sensitization hazard identification. Toxicology in Vitro, 28, 1482-1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2014.08.002 - PubMed
  31. Saito, M., Arakaki, R., Yamada, A., Tsunematsu, T., Kudo, Y., & Ishimaru, N. (2016). Molecular mechanisms of nickel allergy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17, 202-209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17020202 - PubMed
  32. Sakaguchi, H., Ashikaga, T., Miyazawa, M., Yoshida, Y., Ito, Y., Yoneyama, K., Hirota, M., Itagaki, H., Toyoda, H., & Suzuki, H. (2006). Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines; human cell line activation test (h-CLAT). II. An inter-laboratory study of the h-CLAT. Toxicology in Vitro, 20, 774-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2005.10.014 - PubMed
  33. Suzuki, M., Hirota, M., Hagino, S., Itagaki, H., & Aiba, S. (2009). Evaluation of changes of cell-surface thiols as a new biomarker for in vitro sensitization test. Toxicology in Vitro, 23, 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2009.02.002 - PubMed
  34. The EURL ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee. (2016). ESAC opinion on the BASF-coordinated Performance Standards-based validation of the LuSens test method for skin sensitisation testing. ESAC Opinion, No. 2016-04 of 24 June 2016. https://doi.org/10.2787/170247 - PubMed
  35. Tsujita-Inoue, K., Hirota, M., Ashikaga, T., Atobe, T., Kouzuki, H., & Aiba, S. (2014). Skin sensitization risk assessment model using artificial neural network analysis of data from multiple in vitro assays. Toxicology in Vitro, 28, 626-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2014.01.003 - PubMed
  36. Urbisch, D., Mehling, A., Guth, K., Ramirez, T., Honarvar, N., Kolle, S., Landsiedel, R., Jaworska, J., Kern, P. S., Gerberick, F., Natsch, A., Emter, R., Ashikaga, T., Miyazawa, M., & Sakaguchi, H. (2015). Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 71, 337-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.12.008 - PubMed
  37. Yamamoto, Y., Fujita, M., Manibuchi, S., Katsuoka, Y., Ono, A., & Kasahara, T. (2019). Expanding the applicability of the amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA): Determining a weight concentration for preparation of test chemical solutions that yields a predictive capacity identical to the conventional method using molar concentration and demonstrating the capacity to detect sensitizers in liquid mixtures. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 97, 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2019.01.001 - PubMed

Publication Types