Display options
Share it on

Indoor Air. 2021 Dec 17; doi: 10.1111/ina.12974. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

Transport and dispersion of tracers simulating COVID-19 aerosols in passenger aircraft.

Indoor air

Steven Hanna

Affiliations

  1. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

PMID: 34921460 DOI: 10.1111/ina.12974

Abstract

Many laboratory experiments and model development activities have been underway to better estimate the risk of a person indoors becoming infected with COVID-19. The current paper focusses on the near-field (distances < about 5 m) transport and dispersion (T&D) of the virons, treating them as inert tracers. The premise is that the T&D process follows widely used basic analytical near-field formulations such as a slab model, a Gaussian plume model, or a diffusivity (K) model. A slab or Gaussian model is more appropriate for cloud sizes less than the distance scale of the turbulence, while a K model is more appropriate for cloud sizes larger than the distance scale. The proposed slab model is evaluated with observations from the TRANSCOM tracer experiment in Boeing 767 and 777 airplanes, which involved multiple release scenarios. Release rates of 1-μm plastic bead inert tracers were constant over 60 s from a mannequin's mouth and samplers were placed at about 40 nearby seat locations. A simple basic science near-field slab model is shown to agree with observations of maximum concentration and dose within a factor of two or three.

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords: COVID-19; TRANSCOM tracer experiment; indoors dispersion model; near-field; pollutant dispersion in aircraft

References

  1. Vuorinen V, Aarnio M, Alava M, et al. Modelling aerosol transport and virus exposure with numerical simulations in relation to SARS-CoV-2 transmission by inhalation indoors. Safety Sci. 2020;130:104866. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104866 - PubMed
  2. Morawska L, Tang JW, Bahnfleth W, et al. How can airborne transmission of COVID-19 indoors be minimized. Environ Int. 2020;142:105832. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105832 - PubMed
  3. Bazant MZ, Bush JM. A guideline to limit indoor airborne transmission of COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(17):e2018995118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2018.995118 - PubMed
  4. Wells WF. Airborne Contagion and Air Hygiene. Harvard Univ. Press; 1955. - PubMed
  5. Riley EC, Murphy G, Riley R. Airborne spread of measles in a suburban elementary school. Am J Epidem. 1978;107:421-432. - PubMed
  6. Dols WS, Polidoro BJ. CONTAM user guide and program documentation. Version 3.2, NIST Tech Note 1887. Gaithersburg, MD. Nat Inst Science and Tech. 2015; 319. - PubMed
  7. Pasquill F, Smith FB. Atmospheric Diffusion, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons; 1974:429. - PubMed
  8. Hanna SR, Briggs GA, Hosker RP. Handbook on Atmospheric Diffusion. DOE/TIC-11223. Department of Energy, National Technical Information Service; 1982:102. - PubMed
  9. Arya SP. Air Pollution Meteorology and Dispersion. Oxford Univ Press; 1999:310. - PubMed
  10. Stull RB. Chapters 18 and 19: Atmospheric Boundary Layer and Pollution Dispersion. Meteorology for Scientists and Engineers, 3rd ed. University of British Columbia; 2011:940. isbn 978-0-88865-283-6, free download from eoas.ubc.ca/books/Practical_Meteorology/ - PubMed
  11. Venkatram A, Weil J. Modeling turbulent transport of aerosols inside rooms using eddy diffusivity. Indoor Air. 2021;31(6):1886-1895. doi:10.1111/ina.12901 - PubMed
  12. Hanna SR. Letter to the editor on simple short-range transport and dispersion (T&D) modeling of COVID-19 virus, indoors and outdoors. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2020;70(10):957-960. doi:10.1080/10962247.2020.1811611 - PubMed
  13. Van Genuchten MT. Analytical solutions for chemical transport with simultaneous adsorption, zero-order production and first-order decay. J Hydrol. 1981;49:213-233. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(81)90214-6 - PubMed
  14. Mazumdar S, Chen Q. A one-dimensional analytical model for airborne contaminant transport in airliner cabins. Indoor Air. 2009;19:3-13. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00553.x - PubMed
  15. Wasiolek P, Whicker J, Gong H, Rodgers J. Room airflow studies using sonic anemometry. Indoor Air. 1999;9(2):125-133. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.1999.t01-2-00007.x - PubMed
  16. Zhang J, Shaw C, Nguyen-Thi L, MacDonald R, Kerr G. Field measurements of boundary-layer flows in ventilated rooms. ASHRAE Trans. 1995;101(part 2):3889-3899. - PubMed
  17. Kovanen K, Seppanen O, Siren K, Majenen A. Turbulent air flow measurements in ventilated spaces. Environ Int. 1989;15:622-626. - PubMed
  18. Jones R, Masago Y, Bartrand T, Haas C, Nicas M, Rose J. Characterizing the risk of infection from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in commercial passenger aircraft using quantitative microbial risk assessment. Risk Anal. 2009;29(3):355-365. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01161.x - PubMed
  19. Garner RP, Wong KL, Ericson SC, Baker AJ, Orzechowski JA. CFD validation for contaminant transport in aircraft ventilation flow fields. US Dept of Transport, FAA Report No DOT/FAA/AM-04/7. 2004, 9 pages. Accessed on October 25, 2021. https://www.faa.gov/data_research/research/med_humanfacs/oamtechreports/2000s/2004/0407/ - PubMed
  20. Liu W, Wen J, Chao J, et al. Accurate and high-resolution boundary conditions and flow fields in the first-class cabin of an MD-82 Commercial airliner. Atmos Environ. 2012;56:33-34. - PubMed
  21. Silcott D, Kinahan S, Santarpia J, et al. TRANSCOM/AMC Commercial Aircraft Cabin Aerosol Dispersion Tests. Prepared by National Strategic Research Institute, ZeteoTech, and S3I for US Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) and Air Mobility Command (AMC). 2020, 53. https://www.ustranscom.mil/cmd/docs/TRANSCOM%20Report%20Final.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2021. - PubMed
  22. Davis A, Zee M, Clark A, et al. Computational Fluid Dynamics modeling of cough transport in an aircraft cabin. BioRxiv. 2021. doi:10.1101/2021.02.15.431324 - PubMed
  23. Yan Y, Li X, Tu J. Effects of passenger thermal plume on the transport and distribution characteristics of airborne particles in an airliner cabin section. Sci Technol Built Environ. 2016;22(2):153-163. doi:10.1080/23744731.2015.1090254 - PubMed
  24. Ryan PB, Spengler JD, Halfpenny PF. Sequential box models for indoor air quality: application to airliner cabin air quality. Atmos Environ. 1988;22:1031-1038. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(88)903332-2 - PubMed
  25. Taylor GI. Diffusion by continuous movement. Proc London Math Soc Ser. 1921;2(20):196-212. - PubMed
  26. Richardson LF. Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbor graph. Proc Roy Soc A-Math Phy. 1923;104:640-654. - PubMed
  27. Tukey JW. Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley; 1977:711. ISBN -13 978-0201076165. - PubMed
  28. Chang J, Hanna S. Air quality model performance. Meteorol Atmos Phys. 2004;87:167-196. - PubMed
  29. Hanna SR, Franzese P. Along wind dispersion - a simple similarity formula compared with observations at 13 field sites and in one wind tunnel. J Appl Meteorol. 2000;39:1700-1714. - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support