Display options
Cite
Louca S. The rates of global bacterial and archaeal dispersal. ISME J. 2021;16(1):159-167doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01069-8.
Louca, S. (2022). The rates of global bacterial and archaeal dispersal. The ISME journal, 16(1), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01069-8
Louca, Stilianos. "The rates of global bacterial and archaeal dispersal." The ISME journal vol. 16,1 (2022): 159-167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01069-8
Louca S. The rates of global bacterial and archaeal dispersal. ISME J. 2022 Jan;16(1):159-167. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01069-8. Epub 2021 Jul 19. PMID: 34282284.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

ISME J. 2022 Jan;16(1):159-167. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01069-8. Epub 2021 Jul 19.

The rates of global bacterial and archaeal dispersal.

The ISME journal

Stilianos Louca

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA. [email protected].
  2. Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 34282284 DOI: 10.1038/s41396-021-01069-8

Abstract

The phylogenetic resolution at which microorganisms display geographic endemism, the rates at which they disperse at global scales, and the role of humans on global microbial dispersal are largely unknown. Answering these questions is necessary for interpreting microbial biogeography, ecology, and macroevolution and for predicting the spread of emerging pathogenic strains. To resolve these questions, I analyzed the geographic and evolutionary relationships between 36,795 bacterial and archaeal ("prokaryotic") genomes from ∼7000 locations around the world. I find clear signs of continental-scale endemism, including strong correlations between phylogenetic divergence and geographic distance. However, the phylogenetic scale at which endemism generally occurs is extremely small, and most "species" (defined by an average nucleotide identity ≥ 95%) and even closely related strains (average nucleotide identity ≥ 99.9%) are globally distributed. Human-associated lineages display faster dispersal rates than other terrestrial lineages; the average net distance between any two human-associated cell lineages diverging 50 years ago is roughly 580 km. These results suggest that many previously reported global-scale microbial biogeographical patterns are likely the result of recent or current environmental filtering rather than geographic endemism. For human-associated lineages, estimated transition rates between Europe and North America are particularly high, and much higher than for non-human associated terrestrial lineages, highlighting the role that human movement plays in global microbial dispersal. Dispersal was slowest for hot spring- and terrestrial subsurface-associated lineages, indicating that these environments may act as "isolated islands" of microbial evolution.

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Society for Microbial Ecology.

References

  1. Kruckeberg AR, Rabinowitz D. Biological aspects of endemism in higher plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1985;16:447–79. - PubMed
  2. Ceballos G, Brown JH. Global patterns of mammalian diversity, endemism, and endangerment. Conserv Biol. 1995;9:559–68. - PubMed
  3. Mueller GM, Schmit JP, Leacock PR, Buyck B, Cifuentes J, Desjardin DE, et al. Global diversity and distribution of macrofungi. Biodivers Conserv. 2007;16:37–48. - PubMed
  4. Prideaux GJ, Warburton NM. An osteology-based appraisal of the phylogeny and evolution of kangaroos and wallabies (macropodidae: Marsupialia). Zool J Linn Soc. 2010;159:954–87. - PubMed
  5. Finlay BJ, Clarke KJ. Ubiquitous dispersal of microbial species. Nature. 1999;400:828. - PubMed
  6. Whitaker RJ, Grogan DW, Taylor JW. Geographic barriers isolate endemic populations of hyperthermophilic archaea. Science. 2003;301:976–978. - PubMed
  7. Whitfield J. Is everything everywhere? Science. 2005;310:960–61. - PubMed
  8. Boenigk J, Pfandl K, Garstecki T, Harms H, Novarino G, Chatzinotas A. Evidence for geographic isolation and signs of endemism within a protistan morphospecies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5159–64. - PubMed
  9. DeWit R, Bouvier T. ‘Everything is everywhere, but, the environment selects’; what did Baas Becking and Beijerinck really say? Environ Microbiol. 2006;8:755–8. - PubMed
  10. van der Gast CJ. Microbial biogeography: the end of the ubiquitous dispersal hypothesis? Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:544–6. - PubMed
  11. Whittaker KA, Rynearson TA. Evidence for environmental and ecological selection in a microbe with no geographic limits to gene flow. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:2651–56. - PubMed
  12. Louca S, Shih PM, Pennell MW, Fischer WW, Parfrey LW, Doebeli M. Bacterial diversification through geological time. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018;2:1458–67. - PubMed
  13. Martiny JBH, Bohannan BJ, Brown JH, Colwell RK, Fuhrman JA, Green JL, et al. Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:102–12. - PubMed
  14. Martiny JBH, Eisen JA, Penn K, Allison SD, Horner-Devine MC. Drivers of bacterial β-diversity depend on spatial scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:7850–54. - PubMed
  15. Jungblut AD, Lovejoy C, Vincent WF. Global distribution of cyanobacterial ecotypes in the cold biosphere. ISME J. 2010;4:191–202. - PubMed
  16. Gibbons SM, Caporaso JG, Pirrung M, Field D, Knight R, Gilbert JA. Evidence for a persistent microbial seed bank throughout the global ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:4651–55. - PubMed
  17. Ramirez KS, Leff JW, Barberán A, Bates ST, Betley J, Crowther TW, et al. Biogeographic patterns in below-ground diversity in New York City’s Central Park are similar to those observed globally. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014;281:20141988. - PubMed
  18. Gonnella G, Böhnke S, Indenbirken D, Garbe-Schönberg D, Seifert R, Mertens C, et al. Endemic hydrothermal vent species identified in the open ocean seed bank. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16086 EP. - PubMed
  19. Louca S, Mazel F, Doebeli M, Parfrey WL. A census-based estimate of Earth’s bacterial and archaeal diversity. PLoS Biol. 2019;17:e3000106. - PubMed
  20. Ochman H, Wilson A. Evolution in bacteria: evidence for a universal substitution rate in cellular genomes. J Mol Evol. 1987;26:74–86. - PubMed
  21. Kuo CH, Ochman H. Inferring clocks when lacking rocks: the variable rates of molecular evolution in bacteria. Biol Direct. 2009;4:35–35. - PubMed
  22. Roberts MS, Cohan FM. Recombination and migration rates in natural populations of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus mojavensis. Evolution. 1995;49:1081–94. - PubMed
  23. van Gremberghe I, Leliaert F, Mergeay J, Vanormelingen P, Van der Gucht K, Debeer AE, et al. Lack of phylogeographic structure in the freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa suggests global dispersal. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19561. - PubMed
  24. Papke RT, Ramsing NB, Bateson MM, Ward DM. Geographical isolation in hot spring cyanobacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2003;5:650–9. - PubMed
  25. Hongmei J, Aitchison JC, Lacap DC, Peerapornpisal Y, Sompong U, Pointing SB. Community phylogenetic analysis of moderately thermophilic cyanobacterial mats from China, the Philippines and Thailand. Extremophiles. 2005;9:325–32. - PubMed
  26. Miller SR, Castenholz RW, Pedersen D. Phylogeography of the thermophilic cyanobacterium Mastigocladus laminosus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:4751–59. - PubMed
  27. Takacs-Vesbach C, Mitchell K, Jackson-Weaver O, Reysenbach AL. Volcanic calderas delineate biogeographic provinces among Yellowstone thermophiles. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:1681–89. - PubMed
  28. Reno ML, Held NL, Fields CJ, Burke PV, Whitaker RJ. Biogeography of the Sulfolobus islandicus pan-genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:8605–10. - PubMed
  29. Bahl J, Lau MCY, Smith GJD, Vijaykrishna D, Cary SC, Lacap DC, et al. Ancient origins determine global biogeography of hot and cold desert cyanobacteria. Nat Commun. 2011;2:163. - PubMed
  30. Anderson RE, Kouris A, Seward CH, Campbell KM, Whitaker RJ. Structured populations of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius with susceptibility to mobile genetic elements. Genome Biol Evol. 2017;9:1699–710. - PubMed
  31. Podar PT, Yang Z, Björnsdóttir SH, Podar M. Comparative analysis of microbial diversity across temperature gradients in hot springs from Yellowstone and Iceland. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1625. - PubMed
  32. Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. Genbank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;44:D67–D72. - PubMed
  33. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:2567–72. - PubMed
  34. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:346–51. - PubMed
  35. Olm MR, Crits-Christoph A, Diamond S, Lavy A, Carnevali PBM, Banfield JF. Consistent metagenome-derived metrics verify and delineate bacterial species boundaries. mSystems. 2020;5:e00731-19. - PubMed
  36. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5114. - PubMed
  37. Shapiro BJ. What microbial population genomics has taught us about speciation. In: Polz MF, Rajora OP, editors. Population Genomics: Microorganisms. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 31–47. - PubMed
  38. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil PA, et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:996–1004. - PubMed
  39. Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 2020;36:1925–27. - PubMed
  40. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat. 1985;125:1–15. - PubMed
  41. Louca S. Phylogeographic estimation and simulation of global diffusive dispersal. Syst Biol. 2021;70:340–59. - PubMed
  42. Comas I, Coscolla M, Luo T, Borrell S, Holt KE, Kato-Maeda M, et al. Out-of-Africa migration and Neolithic coexpansion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with modern humans. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1176–82. - PubMed
  43. Denef VJ, Banfield JF. In situ evolutionary rate measurements show ecological success of recently emerged bacterial hybrids. Science. 2012;336:462–6. - PubMed
  44. Bouckaert R, Cartwright R. Phylogeography by diffusion on a sphere: whole world phylogeography. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2406. - PubMed
  45. Brillinger DR. A particle migrating randomly on a sphere. In: Selected Works of David Brillinger. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2012. p. 73–87. - PubMed
  46. Ghosh A, Samuel J, Sinha SA. “Gaussian” for diffusion on the sphere. Europhys Lett. 2012;98:30003. - PubMed
  47. Castenholz RW. The biogeography of hot spring algae through enrichment cultures. SIL Commun. 1978;21:296–315. 1953-1996 - PubMed
  48. Valentine DL. Adaptations to energy stress dictate the ecology and evolution of the archaea. Nat Rev Micro. 2007;5:316–23. - PubMed
  49. Louca S, Parfrey LW, Doebeli M. Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome. Science. 2016;353:1272–77. - PubMed
  50. Smith DJ, Jaffe DA, Birmele MN, Griffin DW, Schuerger AC, Hee J, et al. Free tropospheric transport of microorganisms from Asia to North America. Micro Ecol. 2012;64:973–85. - PubMed
  51. Pagel M. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994;255:37–45. - PubMed
  52. Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6578–83. - PubMed
  53. Anderson D. The regulation of fishing and related activities in exclusive economic zones. In: Modern Law Sea, Publications on Ocean Development, vol. 59, chap. 11. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff; 2008. p. 209–27. - PubMed
  54. Bullock JM, Clarke RT. Long distance seed dispersal by wind: measuring and modelling the tail of the curve. Oecologia. 2000;124:506–21. - PubMed
  55. Brynjarsdóttir J, O’Hagan A. Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy. Inverse Probl. 2014;30:114007. - PubMed
  56. Bell T. Experimental tests of the bacterial distance-decay relationship. ISME J. 2010;4:1357–65. - PubMed
  57. Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinforma. 2010;11:119. - PubMed
  58. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2014;25:1043–55. - PubMed
  59. Chambat F, Valette B. Mean radius, mass, and inertia for reference Earth models. Phys Earth Planet Inter. 2001;124:237–53. - PubMed
  60. Data NS, (SEDAC) AC Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPW v4): Population Density, Revision 11. Tech. rep., Palisades, NY: Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University. 2018. Accessed November 23, 2020. - PubMed
  61. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2: approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9490. - PubMed
  62. Britton T, Anderson CL, Jacquet D, Lundqvist S, Bremer K. Estimating divergence times in large phylogenetic trees. Syst Biol. 2007;56:741–52. - PubMed
  63. Zhu Q, Mai U, Pfeiffer W, Janssen S, Asnicar F, Sanders JG, et al. Phylogenomics of 10,575 genomes reveals evolutionary proximity between domains bacteria and archaea. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5477. - PubMed
  64. Perrin F. Étude mathématique du movement brownien de rotation. In: Annales scientifiques del’École Normale Supérieure, vol. 45. Paris, France: Elsevier; with 1928. p. 1–51. - PubMed
  65. Louca S, Doebeli M. Efficient comparative phylogenetics on large trees. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:1053–55. - PubMed
  66. Bloomquist EW, Lemey P, Suchard MA. Three roads diverged? routes to phylogeographic inference. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25:626–32. - PubMed
  67. Lemey P, Rambaut A, Welch JJ, Suchard MA. Phylogeography takes a relaxed random walk in continuous space and time. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:1877–85. - PubMed
  68. Faria NR, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Lemey P. Toward a quantitative understanding of viral phylogeography. Curr Opin Virol. 2011;1:423–9. - PubMed
  69. Faria NR, Suchard MA, Abecasis A, Sousa JD, Ndembi N, Bonfim I, et al. Phylodynamics of the HIV-1 CRF02_AG clade in Cameroon. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:453–60. - PubMed
  70. Lange K. Diffusion processes. In: Applied Probability, chap. 11. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2010. p. 269–95. - PubMed
  71. Ondov BD, Treangen TJ, Melsted P, Mallonee AB, Bergman NH, Koren S, et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using minhash. Genome Biol. 2016;17:132. - PubMed
  72. Pasolli E, Asnicar F, Manara S, Zolfo M, Karcher N, Armanini F, et al. Extensive unexplored human microbiome diversity revealed by over 150,000 genomes from metagenomes spanning age, geography, and lifestyle. Cell 2019;176:649–62. - PubMed
  73. Criscuolo A, Gascuel O. Fast NJ-like algorithms to deal with incomplete distance matrices. BMC Bioinforma. 2008;9:166. - PubMed
  74. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:289–90. - PubMed
  75. Kinene T, Wainaina J, Maina S, Boykin LM, Kliman RM. Methods for rooting trees, vol. 3. Oxford: Academic Press; 2016. p. 489–93. - PubMed
  76. van Rossum G. Python tutorial. Tech. Rep. CS-R9526, Amsterdam: Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica (CWI); 1995. - PubMed

Publication Types