Display options
Share it on

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 02;4(8):e2121888. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21888.

Patient, Family, and Clinician Perspectives on End-of-Life Care Quality Domains and Candidate Indicators for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.

JAMA network open

Jennifer W Mack, Lauren Fisher, Larry Kushi, Chun R Chao, Brenda Vega, Gilda Rodrigues, Isabel Josephs, Katharine E Brock, Susan Buchanan, Mallory Casperson, Robert M Cooper, Karen M Fasciano, Tatjana Kolevska, Joshua R Lakin, Anna Lefebvre, Corey M Schwartz, Dov M Shalman, Catherine B Wall, Lori Wiener, Andrea Altschuler

Affiliations

  1. Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  2. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  3. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
  4. Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
  5. Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island.
  6. Divisions of Pediatric Oncology and Palliative Care, Emory University and Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.
  7. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  8. Now with Agios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  9. Lacuna Loft, Oakland, California.
  10. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
  11. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  12. Division of Medical Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
  13. Department of Palliative Care, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
  14. Psychosocial Support and Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

PMID: 34424305 PMCID: PMC8383130 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21888

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: End-of-life care quality indicators specific to adolescents and young adults (AYAs) aged 12 to 39 years with cancer have not been developed.

OBJECTIVE: To identify priority domains for end-of-life care from the perspectives of AYAs, family caregivers, and clinicians, and to propose candidate quality indicators reflecting priorities.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study was conducted from December 6, 2018, to January 5, 2021, with no additional follow-up. In-depth interviews were conducted with patients, family caregivers, and clinicians and included a content analysis of resulting transcripts. A multidisciplinary advisory group translated priorities into proposed quality indicators. Interviews were conducted at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, and an AYA cancer support community (lacunaloft.org). Participants included 23 AYAs, 28 caregivers, and 29 clinicians.

EXPOSURE: Stage IV or recurrent cancer.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Care priorities.

RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 23 patients (mean [SD] age, 29.3 [7.3] years; 12 men [52%]; 18 White participants [78%]), 28 family caregivers (23 women [82%]; 14 White participants [50%]), and 29 clinicians (20 women [69%]; 13 White participants [45%]). Caregivers included 22 parents (79%), 5 spouses or partners (18%), and 1 other family member (4%); the 29 clinicians included 15 physicians (52%), 6 nurses or nurse practitioners (21%), and 8 social workers or psychologists (28%). Interviews identified 7 end-of-life priority domains: attention to physical symptoms, attention to quality of life, psychosocial and spiritual care, communication and decision-making, relationships with clinicians, care and treatment, and independence. Themes were consistent across the AYA age range and participant type. Although some domains were represented in quality indicators developed for adults, unique domains were identified, as well as AYA-specific manifestations of existing domains. For example, quality of life included global quality of life; attainment of life goals, legacy, and meaning; support of personal relationships; and normalcy. Within communication and decision-making, domains included communication early in the disease course, addressing prognosis and what to expect at the end of life, and opportunity for AYAs to hold desired roles in decision-making. Care and treatment domains relevant to cancer therapy, use of life-prolonging measures, and location of death emphasized the need for preference sensitivity rather than a standard path. This finding differs from existing adult indicators that propose that late-life chemotherapy, intensive measures, and hospital death should be rare.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this qualitative study suggest that AYAs with cancer have priorities for care at the end of life that are not fully encompassed in existing indicators for adults. Use of new indicators for this young population may better reflect patient- and family-centered experiences of quality care.

References

  1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Oct;55 Suppl 2:S318-26 - PubMed
  2. JAMA. 2013 Feb 6;309(5):470-7 - PubMed
  3. Cancer. 2009 Jul 15;115(14):3302-11 - PubMed
  4. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Aug;1(5):592-600 - PubMed
  5. J Pediatr. 1991 Nov;119(5):725-32 - PubMed
  6. Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):897-905 - PubMed
  7. Cancer. 2010 Jul 1;116(13):3267-75 - PubMed
  8. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57 - PubMed
  9. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 10;25(29):4610-5 - PubMed
  10. Cancer. 2011 May 15;117(10 Suppl):2323-8 - PubMed
  11. J Oncol Pract. 2011 May;7(3 Suppl):31s-5s - PubMed
  12. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):337-339.e6 - PubMed
  13. Med Care. 2015 Dec;53(12):1018-26 - PubMed
  14. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 10;25(29):4616-21 - PubMed
  15. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9146-54 - PubMed
  16. Pediatrics. 2015 May;135(5):868-74 - PubMed
  17. Cancer. 2014 Apr 15;120(8):1212-9 - PubMed
  18. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Apr;49(4):773-81 - PubMed
  19. Intern Med J. 2006 May;36(5):302-7 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Sep;45(9):941-50 - PubMed
  21. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006 Sep;4(8):776-818 - PubMed
  22. Oncologist. 2015 Feb;20(2):186-95 - PubMed
  23. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):769-774 - PubMed
  24. Cancer. 2010 Oct 1;116(19):4656-63 - PubMed
  25. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 10;28(32):4862-7 - PubMed
  26. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 10;28(32):4819-24 - PubMed
  27. J Cancer Surviv. 2014 Jun;8(2):282-92 - PubMed
  28. J Palliat Med. 2010 Oct;13(10):1253-60 - PubMed
  29. BMC Cancer. 2008 Jan 23;8:22 - PubMed
  30. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2005 May-Jun;35(5):182-217 - PubMed
  31. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 10;26(23):3860-6 - PubMed
  32. Cancer. 2014 Aug 1;120(15):2352-60 - PubMed
  33. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 20;29(6):755-60 - PubMed
  34. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 20;29(30):4045-53 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support