Display options
Share it on

J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Dec;28(6):2910-2922. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02180-7. Epub 2020 May 25.

To what extent are perfusion defects seen by myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block related to myocardial infarction, ECG characteristics, and myocardial wall motion?.

Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

Fredrik Hedeer, Ellen Ostenfeld, Bo Hedén, Frits W Prinzen, Håkan Arheden, Marcus Carlsson, Henrik Engblom

Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
  2. Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  3. Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. [email protected].

PMID: 32451797 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02180-7

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We investigated if uptake pattern on myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) is related to myocardial fibrosis, myocardial wall motion, and electrocardiography (ECG) characteristics.

METHODS: Twenty-three patients (9 women) with LBBB, examined with MPS and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), were included. Tracer uptake on MPS was classified by visual interpretation as typical LBBB pattern (Defect+, n = 13) or not (Defect-, n = 10) and quantitatively. CMR images were evaluated for wall thickness and for myocardial wall motion both by visual assessment and by regional myocardial radial strain from feature tracking, and for presence and location of myocardial fibrosis. ECGs were analyzed regarding QRS duration and the presence of strict criteria for LBBB.

RESULTS: Wall thickness was slightly lower in the septum compared to the lateral wall in Defect+ patients (5.6 ± 1.1 vs 6.0 ± 1.3 mm, P = 0.03) but not in Defect- patients (5.6 ± 1.0 vs 5.6 ± 0.9 mm, P = 0.84). Defect+ patients showed a larger proportion of dyskinetic segments in the septum and hyperkinetic segments in the lateral wall compared to Defect- patients (P = 0.006 and P = 0.004, respectively). Decreased myocardial radial strain was associated with decreased tracer uptake by MPS (R = 0.37, P < 0.001). Areas of fibrosis did not match areas with uptake defect on MPS. No differences in ECG variables were seen.

CONCLUSION: The heterogeneous regional tracer uptake in some patients with LBBB is related to underlying regional myocardial dyskinesia, wall thickening, and wall thickness rather than stress-induced ischemia, myocardial fibrosis, or specific ECG characteristics.

© 2020. The Author(s).

Keywords: MRI; Physiology of myocardial/coronary perfusion; SPECT; dyssynchrony; gated SPECT; physiology of LV/RV function

References

  1. Hardarson T, Arnason A, Eliasson GJ, Palsson K, Eyjolfsson K, Sigfusson N. Left bundle branch block: Prevalence, incidence, follow-up and outcome. Eur Heart J 1987;8:1075–9. - PubMed
  2. Imanishi R, Seto S, Ichimaru S, Nakashima E, Yano K, Akahoshi M. Prognostic significance of incident complete left bundle branch block observed over a 40-year period. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:644-8. - PubMed
  3. Schneider JF, Thomas HE Jr, Kreger BE, McNamara PM, Kannel WB. Newly acquired left bundle-branch block: The Framingham study. Ann Intern Med 1979;90:303-10. - PubMed
  4. Carlsson M, Hedeer F, Engblom H, Arheden H. Head-to-head comparison of a 2-day myocardial perfusion gated SPECT protocol and cardiac magnetic resonance late gadolinium enhancement for the detection of myocardial infarction. J Nucl Cardiol 2013;20:797-803. - PubMed
  5. Alexanderson E, Mannting F, Gomez-Martin D, Fermon S, Meave A. Technetium-99m-Sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with complete left bundle branch block. Arch Med Res 2004;35:150-6. - PubMed
  6. Higgins JP, Williams G, Nagel JS, Higgins JA. Left bundle-branch block artifact on single photon emission computed tomography with technetium Tc 99 m (Tc-99 m) agents: Mechanisms and a method to decrease false-positive interpretations. Am Heart J 2006;152:619-26. - PubMed
  7. Matzer L, Kiat H, Friedman JD, Van Train K, Maddahi J, Berman DS. A new approach to the assessment of tomographic thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients with left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:1309-17. - PubMed
  8. Hassan N, Escanye JM, Juilliere Y, Marie PY, David N, Olivier P, et al. 201Tl SPECT abnormalities, documented at rest in dilated cardiomyopathy, are related to a lower than normal myocardial thickness but not to an excess in myocardial wall stress. J Nucl Med 2002;43:451-7. - PubMed
  9. Mahrholdt H, Zhydkov A, Hager S, Meinhardt G, Vogelsberg H, Wagner A, et al. Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities as well as reduced wall thickness can cause false positive results of routine SPECT perfusion imaging for detection of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2127-35. - PubMed
  10. Vernooy K, Verbeek XA, Peschar M, Crijns HJ, Arts T, Cornelussen RN, et al. Left bundle branch block induces ventricular remodelling and functional septal hypoperfusion. Eur Heart J 2005;26:91-8. - PubMed
  11. Heiberg E, Sjogren J, Ugander M, Carlsson M, Engblom H, Arheden H. Design and validation of Segment - freely available software for cardiovascular image analysis. BMC Med Imaging 2010;10:1. - PubMed
  12. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-42. - PubMed
  13. Chen J, Garcia EV, Folks RD, Cooke CD, Faber TL, Tauxe EL, et al. Onset of left ventricular mechanical contraction as determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: Development of a diagnostic tool for assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:687-95. - PubMed
  14. Heyde B, Jasaityte R, Barbosa D, Robesyn V, Bouchez S, Wouters P, et al. Elastic image registration versus speckle tracking for 2-D myocardial motion estimation: a direct comparison in vivo. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013;32:449-59. - PubMed
  15. Amado LC, Gerber BL, Gupta SN, Rettmann DW, Szarf G, Schock R, et al. Accurate and objective infarct sizing by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a canine myocardial infarction model. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2383-9. - PubMed
  16. Strauss DG, Selvester RH, Wagner GS. Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:927-34. - PubMed
  17. Onishi T, Saha SK, Ludwig DR, Onishi T, Marek JJ, Cavalcante JL, et al. Feature tracking measurement of dyssynchrony from cardiovascular magnetic resonance cine acquisitions: Comparison with echocardiographic speckle tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:95. - PubMed
  18. Prinzen FW, Hunter WC, Wyman BT, McVeigh ER. Mapping of regional myocardial strain and work during ventricular pacing: Experimental study using magnetic resonance imaging tagging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1735-42. - PubMed
  19. Van Kriekinge SD, Nishina H, Ohba M, Berman DS, Germano G. Automatic global and regional phase analysis from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: Application to the characterization of ventricular contraction in patients with left bundle branch block. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1790-7. - PubMed
  20. Bois JP, Scott C, Chareonthaitawee P, Gibbons RJ, Rodriguez-Porcel M. Phase analysis single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) detects dyssynchrony in myocardial scar and increases specificity of MPI. EJNMMI Res 2019;9:11. - PubMed
  21. Koepfli P, Wyss CA, Gaemperli O, Siegrist PT, Klainguti M, Schepis T, et al. Left bundle branch block causes relative but not absolute septal underperfusion during exercise. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2993-9. - PubMed
  22. Duchenne J, Turco A, Unlu S, Pagourelias ED, Vunckx K, Degtiarova G, et al. Left ventricular remodeling results in homogenization of myocardial work distribution. Circ Arrhyth Electrophysiol 2019;12:e007224. - PubMed
  23. Hayat SA, Dwivedi G, Jacobsen A, Lim TK, Kinsey C, Senior R. Effects of left bundle-branch block on cardiac structure, function, perfusion, and perfusion reserve: Implications for myocardial contrast echocardiography versus radionuclide perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2008;117:1832-41. - PubMed
  24. Aalen JM, Remme EW, Larsen CK, Andersen OS, Krogh M, Duchenne J et al. Mechanism of Abnormal Septal Motion in Left Bundle Branch Block: Role of Left Ventricular Wall Interactions and Myocardial Scar. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019. - PubMed
  25. Bleeker GB, Schalij MJ, Molhoek SG, Verwey HF, Holman ER, Boersma E, et al. Relationship between QRS duration and left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with end-stage heart failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004;15:544-9. - PubMed
  26. Inanir S, Caliskan B, Tokay S, Oktay A. QRS complex duration and dipyridamole gated SPECT findings in the left bundle branch block. Ann Nucl Med 2008;22:565-70. - PubMed
  27. Vaduganathan P, He ZX, Raghavan C, Mahmarian JJ, Verani MS. Detection of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis in patients with left bundle branch block: Exercise, adenosine or dobutamine imaging? J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:543-50. - PubMed
  28. Stewart RA, Young AA, Anderson C, Teo KK, Jennings G, Cowan BR. Relationship between QRS duration and left ventricular mass and volume in patients at high cardiovascular risk. Heart 2011;97:1766-70. - PubMed

Publication Types