Display options
Share it on

Front Nutr. 2021 Dec 01;8:762753. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.762753. eCollection 2021.

Do Certain Flavonoid IMPS Have a Vital Function?.

Frontiers in nutrition

David S Seigler, J Brent Friesen, Jonathan Bisson, James G Graham, Ana Bedran-Russo, James B McAlpine, Guido F Pauli

Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States.
  2. Center for Natural Products Technologies, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
  3. Pharmacognosy Institute, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
  4. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
  5. Physical Sciences Department, Dominican University, River Forest, IL, United States.
  6. Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

PMID: 34926546 PMCID: PMC8672243 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.762753

Abstract

Flavonoids are a vast group of metabolites that are essential for vascular plant physiology and, thus, occur ubiquitously in plant-based/-derived foods. The solitary designation of thousands of known flavonoids hides the fact that their metabolomes are structurally highly diverse, consist of disparate subgroups, yet undergo a certain degree of metabolic interconversion. Unsurprisingly, flavonoids have been an important theme in nutrition research. Already in the 1930s, it was discovered that the ability of synthetic Vitamin C to treat scurvy was inferior to that of plant extracts containing Vitamin C. Subsequent experimental evidence led to the proposal of Vitamin P (permeability) as an essential phytochemical nutrient. However, attempts to isolate and characterize Vitamin P gave confusing and sometimes irreproducible results, which today can be interpreted as rooted in the unrecognized (residual) complexity of the intervention materials. Over the years, primarily flavonoids (and some coumarins) were known as having Vitamin P-like activity. More recently, in a NAPRALERT meta-analysis, essentially all of these Vitamin P candidates were identified as IMPs (Invalid/Improbable/Interfering Metabolic Panaceas). While the historic inability to define a single compound and specific mode of action led to general skepticism about the Vitamin P proposition for "bioflavonoids," the more logical conclusion is that several abundant and metabolically labile plant constituents fill this essential role in human nutrition at the interface of vitamins, cofactors, and micronutrients. Reviewing 100+ years of the multilingual Vitamin P and C literature provides the rationales for this conclusion and new perspectives for future research.

Copyright © 2021 Seigler, Friesen, Bisson, Graham, Bedran-Russo, McAlpine and Pauli.

Keywords: Vitamin C; Vitamin P; cofactors; flavonoids; invalid metabolic panaceas (IMPS); micronutrients; vitamins

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Experientia. 1968 Apr 15;24(4):326 - PubMed
  2. Arch Pharm Res. 1998 Feb;21(1):17-23 - PubMed
  3. J Physiol. 1940 Jul 24;98(3):361-74 - PubMed
  4. Nutr J. 2017 Jan 19;16(1):5 - PubMed
  5. Dent Mater. 2014 Jan;30(1):62-76 - PubMed
  6. Biochem J. 1924;18(3-4):632-7 - PubMed
  7. J Org Chem. 2017 Feb 3;82(3):1316-1329 - PubMed
  8. J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Dec 26;60(51):12531-9 - PubMed
  9. ACS Chem Biol. 2014 Aug 15;9(8):1788-98 - PubMed
  10. Bull Soc Chim Biol (Paris). 1951;33(3-4):304-5 - PubMed
  11. J Med Chem. 2016 Mar 10;59(5):1671-90 - PubMed
  12. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007 Sep;51(9):1152-62 - PubMed
  13. Nat Prod Rep. 2003 Aug;20(4):382-91 - PubMed
  14. Am J Clin Nutr. 1975 Nov;28(11):1242-54 - PubMed
  15. Eur J Nutr. 2014 Apr;53 Suppl 1:1-9 - PubMed
  16. J Med Chem. 2010 Apr 8;53(7):2719-40 - PubMed
  17. Nutr Rev. 2020 Jun 1;78(6):451-458 - PubMed
  18. Biochem J. 1927;21(2):354-5 - PubMed
  19. Circ Res. 2018 Jan 19;122(2):369-384 - PubMed
  20. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004 Apr 1;36(7):829-37 - PubMed
  21. Biochem J. 1928;22(6):1387-409 - PubMed
  22. Biochem J. 1932;26(3):865-70 - PubMed
  23. Bull Soc Chim Biol (Paris). 1951;33(3-4):302-3 - PubMed
  24. Biochem J. 1937 Jun;31(6):915-9 - PubMed
  25. Biochem J. 1920 Oct;14(5):660 - PubMed
  26. Adv Nutr. 2013 Sep 01;4(5):576-7 - PubMed
  27. Digestion. 1977;15(4):295-302 - PubMed
  28. Fitoterapia. 2000 Apr;71(2):162-75 - PubMed
  29. Clin Dermatol. 2013 May-Jun;31(3):327-31 - PubMed
  30. Food Funct. 2015 Jan;6(1):32-41 - PubMed
  31. Molecules. 2020 May 10;25(9): - PubMed
  32. Biochem J. 1939 Sep;33(9):1400-7 - PubMed
  33. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jan;105(1):10-22 - PubMed
  34. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1949 Mar;95(3):363-81 - PubMed
  35. Australas Med J. 2013;6(2):104-6 - PubMed
  36. Nutr Rev. 1975 Jun;33(6):176-7 - PubMed
  37. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1956 Mar;11(1):52-7 - PubMed
  38. Angiologica. 1972;9(3-6):355-74 - PubMed
  39. Biochem J. 1927;21(3):689-97 - PubMed
  40. J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Mar 6;61(9):2146-57 - PubMed
  41. J Hyg (Lond). 1907 Oct;7(5):634-71 - PubMed
  42. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2018 Sep;17(5):1054-1112 - PubMed
  43. Adv Nutr. 2015 Jan 15;6(1):1-4 - PubMed
  44. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):97-102 - PubMed
  45. Curr Drug Metab. 2014 Jan;15(1):48-61 - PubMed
  46. Science. 1932 Apr 1;75(1944):357-8 - PubMed
  47. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28460 - PubMed
  48. Nutr Rev. 2020 Aug 1;78(8):615-626 - PubMed
  49. J Agric Food Chem. 2006 May 3;54(9):3219-24 - PubMed
  50. Biochem Pharmacol. 1984 Dec 15;33(24):3933-9 - PubMed
  51. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006 Jan;70(1):178-92 - PubMed
  52. Eur J Nutr. 2017 Dec;56(Suppl 3):37-42 - PubMed
  53. Food Funct. 2010 Dec;1(3):233-53 - PubMed

Publication Types