Display options
Share it on

Int J Equity Health. 2021 Dec 18;20(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01564-6.

Implementation of paediatric vision screening in urban and rural areas in Cluj County, Romania.

International journal for equity in health

Jan Kik, Mandy Nordmann, Simona Cainap, Mihai Mara, Daniela Rajka, Monica Ghițiu, Alin Vladescu, Frea Sloot, Anna Horwood, Maria Fronius, Cristina Vladutiu, Huibert Jan Simonsz

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  2. University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  3. Department of Social and Medical Assistance, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  4. School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
  5. Department of Ophthalmology, Child Vision Research Unit, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  6. Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. [email protected].

PMID: 34922555 PMCID: PMC8684067 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01564-6

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2018 and 2019, paediatric vision screening was implemented in Cluj County, Romania, where universal paediatric vision screening does not yet exist. We report on the preparation and the first year of implementation.

METHODS: Objectives, target population and screening protocol were defined. In cities, children were screened by kindergarten nurses. In rural areas, kindergartens have no nurses and children were screened by family doctors' nurses, initially at the doctors' offices, later also in rural kindergartens. CME-accredited training courses and treatment pathways were organised. Implementation was assessed through on-site observations, interviews, questionnaires and analysis of screening results of referred children.

RESULTS: Out of 12,795 eligible four- and five-year-old children, 7,876 were screened in 2018. In the cities, kindergarten nurses screened most children without difficulties. In Cluj-Napoca 1.62x the average annual birth rate was screened and in the small cities 1.64x. In the rural areas, however, nurses of family doctors screened only 0.49x the birth rate. In 51 out of 75 rural communes, no screening took place in the first year. Of 118 rural family doctors' nurses, 51 had followed the course and 26 screened children. They screened only 41 children per nurse, on average, as compared to 80 in the small cities and 100 in Cluj-Napoca. Screening at rural kindergartens met with limited success. These are attended by few children because of low population density, parents working abroad or children being kept at home in case of bad weather and road conditions.

CONCLUSIONS: Three times fewer children were screened in rural areas as compared to urban areas. Kindergartens in rural areas are too small to employ nurses and family doctors' nurses do not have easy access to many children and have competing healthcare priorities: there are 1.5x as many family doctors in urban areas as compared to rural areas. For nationwide scaling-up of vision screening, nurses should be enabled to screen a sufficient number of children in rural areas.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Keywords: Amblyopia; Children; Disparity; Implementation study; Rural; Urban; Vision screening

References

  1. Vis Neurosci. 2018 Jan;35:E015 - PubMed
  2. Health Syst Transit. 2016 Aug;18(4):1-170 - PubMed
  3. Int J Audiol. 2021 Nov;60(11):831-840 - PubMed
  4. BMJ. 2013 Nov 20;347:f6753 - PubMed
  5. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jul;51(7):3476-84 - PubMed
  6. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 10;18(4): - PubMed
  7. Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Jul;101(4):521-526 - PubMed
  8. Croat Med J. 2002 Aug;43(4):446-52 - PubMed
  9. Health Care Anal. 2008 Mar;16(1):17-30 - PubMed
  10. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;97(1):24-28 - PubMed
  11. Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Sep 1;94(9):652-659 - PubMed
  12. Strabismus. 2016 Sep;24(3):120-35 - PubMed
  13. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Apr;86(4):317-9 - PubMed
  14. Med Care. 1997 Mar;35(3):219-36 - PubMed
  15. Glob Health Promot. 2013 Dec;20(4):35-43 - PubMed
  16. Br Med J. 1959 Jan 24;1(5116):202-6 - PubMed
  17. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;91(11):1450-1 - PubMed
  18. Lancet. 2000 Sep 23;356(9235):1093-8 - PubMed
  19. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76 - PubMed
  20. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;93(4):322-9 - PubMed
  21. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;245(11):1589-95 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support