Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jan 01;149(1):83-95. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008652.

Complications in Brachioplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery

Albaraa Aljerian, Jad Abi-Rafeh, José Ramirez-GarciaLuna, Thomas Hemmerling, Mirko S Gilardino

PMID: 34936607 DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008652

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brachioplasty procedures have experienced a surge in popularity over the past decade, mirroring the rise in bariatric procedures and growing population of massive weight loss patients. The authors estimated the incidence of associated complications and identify possible patient- or procedure-related predictive factors.

METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases; extracted data were synthesized through a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions and a multivariate meta-regression.

RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, representing 1578 patients; all studies followed an observational design. The incidence of adverse outcomes assessed included aberrant scarring, 9.9 percent (95 percent CI, 6.1 to 15.6 percent); ptosis or recurrence, 7.79 percent (95 percent CI, 4.8 to 12.35 percent); wound dehiscence, 6.81 percent (95 percent CI, 4.63 to 9.90 percent); seroma, 5.91 percent (95 percent CI, 3.75 to 9.25 percent); infection, 3.64 percent (95 percent CI, 2.38 to 5.53 percent); nerve-related complications, 2.47 percent (95 percent CI, 1.45 to 4.18 percent); lymphedema or lymphocele formation, 2.46 percent (95 percent CI, 1.55 to 3.88 percent); skin necrosis or delayed healing, 2.27 percent (95 percent CI, 1.37 to 3.74 percent); and hematoma, 2.06 percent (95 percent CI, 1.38 to 3.06 percent). The operative reintervention rate for aesthetic purposes was 7.46 percent (95 percent CI, 5.05 to 10.88 percent), and the operative reintervention rate for nonaesthetic purposes was 1.62 percent (95 percent CI, 1.00 to 2.61 percent). Multivariate meta-regression demonstrated that medial incision placement was associated with a higher risk of complications, whereas the incidence of certain complications was lowered with adjunctive liposuction (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: In the absence of large clinical trials, the present meta-analysis can serve to provide plastic surgeons with an evidence-based reference to improve informed consent and guide procedure selection with respect to the complication profile of brachioplasty.

Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

References

1. Miotto G, Ortiz-Pomales Y. Arm contouring: Review and current concepts. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38:850–860. - PubMed
2. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2018 plastic surgery statistics. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics. Accessed November 16, 2019. - PubMed
3. Rohrich RJ, Mohan R, Durand PD. Brachioplasty refinements: Limited-incision brachioplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145:754e–756e. - PubMed
4. Hill S, Small KH, Pezeshk RA, Rohrich RJ. Liposuction-assisted short-scar brachioplasty: Technical highlights. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:447e–450e. - PubMed
5. Goddio AS. A new technique for brachioplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:85–91. - PubMed
6. Hurwitz D. Brachioplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41:745–751. - PubMed
7. Gusenoff JA, Coon D, Rubin JP. Brachioplasty and concomitant procedures after massive weight loss: A statistical analysis from a prospective registry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:595–603. - PubMed
8. Knoetgen J III, Moran SL. Long-term outcomes and complications associated with brachioplasty: A retrospective review and cadaveric study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:2219–2223. - PubMed
9. Symbas JD, Losken A. An outcome analysis of brachioplasty techniques following massive weight loss. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:588–591. - PubMed
10. Sisti A, Cuomo R, Milonia L, et al. Complications associated with brachioplasty: A literature review. Acta Biomed. 2018;88:393–402. - PubMed
11. Shermak MA. Aesthetic refinements in body contouring in the massive weight loss patient: Part 2. Arms. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:726e–735e. - PubMed
12. Higgins JPT, Greene S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. 2011London: The Cochrane Collaboration; . Available at: www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed August 2, 2019. - PubMed
13. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1. - PubMed
14. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2013. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Available at: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed June 15, 2019. - PubMed
15. Di Pietro V, Colicchia GM, Cervelli V, Gentile P. Arm contouring after massive weight loss: Liposuction-assisted brachioplasty versus standard technique. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2018;11:73–78. - PubMed
16. Bocchiotti MA, Ruka E, Spaziante L, Morozzo U, Baglioni EA, Bruschi S. ‘J’ brachioplasty technique in massive weight loss patients. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018;52:282–287. - PubMed
17. Boccara D, Petit A, Reinbold C, Chaouat M, Mimoun M, Serror K. The M-Y axilloplasty after massive weight loss: Analysis of 159 consecutive patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42:1059–1064. - PubMed
18. Simone P, Carusi C, Segreto F, et al. Postbariatric brachioplasty with posteromedial scar: Physical model, technical refinements, and clinical outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:344–353. - PubMed
19. Gentileschi S, Servillo M, Ferrandina G, Salgarello M. Lymphatic and sensory function of the upper limb after brachioplasty in post-bariatric massive weight loss patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37:1022–1031. - PubMed
20. Ferraro GA, De Francesco F, Razzano S, D’Andrea F, Nicoletti G. Modified fish-incision technique in brachioplasty: A surgical approach to correct excess skin and fat of the upper arm (restoring the armpit contour). Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39:203–208. - PubMed
21. de Runz A, Colson T, Minetti C, et al. Liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty after massive weight loss: An efficient procedure with a high functional benefit. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:74e–84e. - PubMed
22. Elkhatib H. Posterior scar brachioplasty with fascial suspension: A long-term follow-up of a modified technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2013;1:e38. - PubMed
23. Knotts CD, Kortesis BG, Hunstad JP. Avulsion brachioplasty: Technique overview and 5-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:283–288. - PubMed
24. Fantozzi F. Brachial lifting using the balanced triple-vector (BTV) technique with dual opposing flaps. Eur J Plast Surg. 2014;37:95–102. - PubMed
25. Zomerlei TA, Neaman KC, Armstrong SD, et al. Brachioplasty outcomes: A review of a multipractice cohort. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:883–889. - PubMed
26. Bracaglia R, D’Ettorre M, Gentileschi S, Mingrone G, Tambasco D. “Kris knife” brachioplasty after bariatric surgery and massive weight loss. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37:640–642. - PubMed
27. Bossert RP, Dreifuss S, Coon D, et al. Liposuction of the arm concurrent with brachioplasty in the massive weight loss patient: Is it safe? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:357–365. - PubMed
28. Modolin ML, Cintra W Jr, Faintuch J, et al. Improved double-fuse technique for post-bariatric brachioplasty. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2011;38:217–222. - PubMed
29. Nguyen AT, Rohrich RJ. Liposuction-assisted posterior brachioplasty: Technical refinements in upper arm contouring. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1365–1369. - PubMed
30. Rivera Citarella E, Condé-Green A, Nakamura F, Pitanguy I. Plication of the brachial fascia: An important step in dermolipectomy procedures of the arm. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30:66–70. - PubMed
31. Hurwitz DJ, Jerrod K. L-brachioplasty: An adaptable technique for moderate to severe excess skin and fat of the arms. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30:620–629. - PubMed
32. Bruschi S, Datta G, Bocchiotti MA, Boriani F, Obbialero FD, Fraccalvieri M. Limb contouring after massive weight loss: Functional rather than aesthetic improvement. Obes Surg. 2009;19:407–411. - PubMed
33. Migliori FC, Ghiglione M, D’Alessandro G, Serra Cervetti GG. Brachioplasty after bariatric surgery: Personal technique. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1165–1169. - PubMed
34. El Khatib HA. Classification of brachial ptosis: Strategy for treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1337–1342. - PubMed
35. Cannistra C, Valero R, Benelli C, Marmuse JP. Brachioplasty after massive weight loss: A simple algorithm for surgical plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31:6–9; discussion 10–11. - PubMed
36. Hurwitz DJ, Holland SW. The L brachioplasty: An innovative approach to correct excess tissue of the upper arm, axilla, and lateral chest. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:403–411; discussion 412–413. - PubMed
37. Abramson DL. Minibrachioplasty: Minimizing scars while maximizing results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1631–1634; discussion 1635–1637. - PubMed
38. de Souza Pinto EB, Erazo PJ, Matsuda CA, et al. Brachioplasty technique with the use of molds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1854–1860; discussion 1861–1865. - PubMed
39. Guest RA, Amar D, Czerniak S, et al. Heterogeneity in body contouring outcomes based research: The Pittsburgh body contouring complication reporting system. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;38:60–70. - PubMed
40. Aboul Wafa AM. S-shaped brachioplasty: An effective technique to correct excess skin and fat of the upper arm. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:661e–663e. - PubMed
41. Wolf AM, Kuhlmann HW. Reconstructive procedures after massive weight loss. Obes Surg. 2007;17:355–360. - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article