Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Dec 14;15:2809-2819. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S340971. eCollection 2021.
Factors Associated with Adherence to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Among Young People with Type 1 Diabetes in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Patient preference and adherence
Wencong Lv, Jiaxin Luo, Qing Long, Jundi Yang, Xin Wang, Jia Guo
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Clinical Nursing Department, Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
- Nursing Department, School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
PMID: 34938070
PMCID: PMC8686228 DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S340971
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) plays a crucial role in the maintenance of glycemic control in young people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), but most of them do not perform SMBG as recommended. Few studies comprehensively explored factors that correlate with adherence to SMBG among this population on the basis of a framework. Hence, the aims of this study were to describe adherence to SMBG among young people with T1DM in China and explore its associating factors according to the Self and Family Management (SFM) framework.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on young people with T1DM in Hunan Province of China from July to August 2020. Based on the SFM framework, self-reported questionnaires were organized for the collection of data on adherence to SMBG, socio-demographic and clinical factors, resources, health care system, and personal factors. Factors associated with adherence to SMBG were determined through multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 165 young people were invited, of which 122 (73.9%) completed the questionnaires. The mean age was 12.41 years (SD = 3.18), and the proportion of young people who adhered to SMBG was 53.3%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that children aged 8-12 years (OR = 0.188, P = 0.002), from two-parent families (OR = 0.232, P = 0.019), and with better personal factors (eg, with more information of SMBG, OR = 1.072, P = 0.020; lower diabetes-related worry, OR = 0.917, P = 0.031; higher level of pain during SMBG, OR = 1.852, P = 0.001), had better adherence to SMBG.
CONCLUSION: Nearly half of the young people with T1DM were not adherent to SMBG in China. Clinicians need to pay more attention to adolescents from single-parent families with regard to their adherence to SMBG. Providing management strategies of SMBG, including delivering SMBG-related information, decreasing diabetes-related worry, and relieving pain related to SMBG, may improve adherence.
© 2021 Lv et al.
Keywords: influencing factors; self-monitoring of blood glucose; type 1 diabetes mellitus; young people
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S148-S164 - PubMed
- Nurs Outlook. 2015 Mar-Apr;63(2):162-70 - PubMed
- Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 Nov;20(7):997-1006 - PubMed
- Diabetes Metab J. 2018 Dec;42(6):480-487 - PubMed
- J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96 - PubMed
- Am Psychol. 2016 Oct;71(7):539-551 - PubMed
- Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2011 Oct;121(10):333-43 - PubMed
- Diabet Med. 2017 May;34(5):732 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2018 Jun 16;391(10138):2449-2462 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2011 Sep;34(9):1943-5 - PubMed
- Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):60-76 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 May;35(4):415-25 - PubMed
- Diabetes Ther. 2017 Feb;8(1):75-83 - PubMed
- Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Mar 17;11:128 - PubMed
- Diabetes Educ. 2011 Jan-Feb;37(1):85-94 - PubMed
- Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2013 Nov 06;6:421-6 - PubMed
- Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003 Dec;2(4):323 - PubMed
- Nutrients. 2018 Jul 29;10(8): - PubMed
- Arch Dis Child. 2012 May;97(5):436-9 - PubMed
- J Clin Nurs. 2020 Dec;29(23-24):4633-4644 - PubMed
- Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008 Jul 13;366(1874):2377-88 - PubMed
- Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Sep;24(9):760-4 - PubMed
- Diabet Med. 2017 Sep;34(9):1252-1258 - PubMed
- MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2007 Jul-Aug;32(4):223-9 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1398-1405 - PubMed
- Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2018 Mar 29;11:93-104 - PubMed
- Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jul;129:32-42 - PubMed
- Rev Prat. 2018 Jun;68(6):607-610 - PubMed
- J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov-Dec;25(13-14):2499-2510 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13;376(15):1419-1429 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2013 Jul;36(7):2009-14 - PubMed
- J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2018 Jul/Aug;39(6):508-515 - PubMed
- Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Sep;10 Suppl 12:71-81 - PubMed
- Pediatr Diabetes. 2007 Aug;8(4):220-7 - PubMed
- JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Dec 1;171(12):1176-1183 - PubMed
- Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 5th Jan 2017;130(1):39-44 - PubMed
- Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb;18 Suppl 2:S223-33 - PubMed
- Anesth Analg. 2018 Feb;126(2):691-698 - PubMed
- J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2020 Jun;27(2):247-255 - PubMed
- J Child Fam Stud. 2016 Jan 1;25(1):176-188 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S66-S76 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2003 Apr;26(4):1052-7 - PubMed
- Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Oct;19 Suppl 27:105-114 - PubMed
- Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2019 Jan 28;139(2): - PubMed
- Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Jul;16(7):460-75 - PubMed
- J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jul;75(7):1439-1449 - PubMed
- Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb;18 Suppl 2:S248-52 - PubMed
- Diabet Med. 1998 Jul;15(7):539-53 - PubMed
- Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Mar 22;11:50 - PubMed
- Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018 Apr;42(2):186-194 - PubMed
- Diabetes Metab J. 2019 Aug;43(4):383-397 - PubMed
- Health Psychol. 2017 Mar;36(3):236-244 - PubMed
- Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 May;22(3):482-494 - PubMed
- Pain. 1993 Nov;55(2):195-203 - PubMed
Publication Types