Display options
Share it on

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Dec 14;15:2809-2819. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S340971. eCollection 2021.

Factors Associated with Adherence to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Among Young People with Type 1 Diabetes in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Patient preference and adherence

Wencong Lv, Jiaxin Luo, Qing Long, Jundi Yang, Xin Wang, Jia Guo

Affiliations

  1. Clinical Nursing Department, Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
  2. Nursing Department, School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.

PMID: 34938070 PMCID: PMC8686228 DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S340971

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) plays a crucial role in the maintenance of glycemic control in young people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), but most of them do not perform SMBG as recommended. Few studies comprehensively explored factors that correlate with adherence to SMBG among this population on the basis of a framework. Hence, the aims of this study were to describe adherence to SMBG among young people with T1DM in China and explore its associating factors according to the Self and Family Management (SFM) framework.

METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on young people with T1DM in Hunan Province of China from July to August 2020. Based on the SFM framework, self-reported questionnaires were organized for the collection of data on adherence to SMBG, socio-demographic and clinical factors, resources, health care system, and personal factors. Factors associated with adherence to SMBG were determined through multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 165 young people were invited, of which 122 (73.9%) completed the questionnaires. The mean age was 12.41 years (SD = 3.18), and the proportion of young people who adhered to SMBG was 53.3%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that children aged 8-12 years (OR = 0.188, P = 0.002), from two-parent families (OR = 0.232, P = 0.019), and with better personal factors (eg, with more information of SMBG, OR = 1.072, P = 0.020; lower diabetes-related worry, OR = 0.917, P = 0.031; higher level of pain during SMBG, OR = 1.852, P = 0.001), had better adherence to SMBG.

CONCLUSION: Nearly half of the young people with T1DM were not adherent to SMBG in China. Clinicians need to pay more attention to adolescents from single-parent families with regard to their adherence to SMBG. Providing management strategies of SMBG, including delivering SMBG-related information, decreasing diabetes-related worry, and relieving pain related to SMBG, may improve adherence.

© 2021 Lv et al.

Keywords: influencing factors; self-monitoring of blood glucose; type 1 diabetes mellitus; young people

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  1. Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S148-S164 - PubMed
  2. Nurs Outlook. 2015 Mar-Apr;63(2):162-70 - PubMed
  3. Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 Nov;20(7):997-1006 - PubMed
  4. Diabetes Metab J. 2018 Dec;42(6):480-487 - PubMed
  5. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96 - PubMed
  6. Am Psychol. 2016 Oct;71(7):539-551 - PubMed
  7. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2011 Oct;121(10):333-43 - PubMed
  8. Diabet Med. 2017 May;34(5):732 - PubMed
  9. Lancet. 2018 Jun 16;391(10138):2449-2462 - PubMed
  10. Diabetes Care. 2011 Sep;34(9):1943-5 - PubMed
  11. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):60-76 - PubMed
  12. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 May;35(4):415-25 - PubMed
  13. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Feb;8(1):75-83 - PubMed
  14. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Mar 17;11:128 - PubMed
  15. Diabetes Educ. 2011 Jan-Feb;37(1):85-94 - PubMed
  16. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2013 Nov 06;6:421-6 - PubMed
  17. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003 Dec;2(4):323 - PubMed
  18. Nutrients. 2018 Jul 29;10(8): - PubMed
  19. Arch Dis Child. 2012 May;97(5):436-9 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Dec;29(23-24):4633-4644 - PubMed
  21. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008 Jul 13;366(1874):2377-88 - PubMed
  22. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Sep;24(9):760-4 - PubMed
  23. Diabet Med. 2017 Sep;34(9):1252-1258 - PubMed
  24. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2007 Jul-Aug;32(4):223-9 - PubMed
  25. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1398-1405 - PubMed
  26. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2018 Mar 29;11:93-104 - PubMed
  27. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jul;129:32-42 - PubMed
  28. Rev Prat. 2018 Jun;68(6):607-610 - PubMed
  29. J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov-Dec;25(13-14):2499-2510 - PubMed
  30. N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13;376(15):1419-1429 - PubMed
  31. Diabetes Care. 2013 Jul;36(7):2009-14 - PubMed
  32. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2018 Jul/Aug;39(6):508-515 - PubMed
  33. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Sep;10 Suppl 12:71-81 - PubMed
  34. Pediatr Diabetes. 2007 Aug;8(4):220-7 - PubMed
  35. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Dec 1;171(12):1176-1183 - PubMed
  36. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 5th Jan 2017;130(1):39-44 - PubMed
  37. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb;18 Suppl 2:S223-33 - PubMed
  38. Anesth Analg. 2018 Feb;126(2):691-698 - PubMed
  39. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2020 Jun;27(2):247-255 - PubMed
  40. J Child Fam Stud. 2016 Jan 1;25(1):176-188 - PubMed
  41. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S66-S76 - PubMed
  42. Diabetes Care. 2003 Apr;26(4):1052-7 - PubMed
  43. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Oct;19 Suppl 27:105-114 - PubMed
  44. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2019 Jan 28;139(2): - PubMed
  45. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Jul;16(7):460-75 - PubMed
  46. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jul;75(7):1439-1449 - PubMed
  47. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb;18 Suppl 2:S248-52 - PubMed
  48. Diabet Med. 1998 Jul;15(7):539-53 - PubMed
  49. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Mar 22;11:50 - PubMed
  50. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018 Apr;42(2):186-194 - PubMed
  51. Diabetes Metab J. 2019 Aug;43(4):383-397 - PubMed
  52. Health Psychol. 2017 Mar;36(3):236-244 - PubMed
  53. Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 May;22(3):482-494 - PubMed
  54. Pain. 1993 Nov;55(2):195-203 - PubMed

Publication Types