Display options
Share it on

Children (Basel). 2021 Dec 02;8(12). doi: 10.3390/children8121114.

Lexical and Grammatical Errors in Developmentally Language Disordered and Typically Developed Children: The Impact of Age and Discourse Genre.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)

Aleksandr N Kornev, Ingrida Balčiūnienė

Affiliations

  1. Department of Logopathology, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, 194100 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
  2. Department of Lithuanian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania.

PMID: 34943310 PMCID: PMC8700286 DOI: 10.3390/children8121114

Abstract

Persistent lexical and grammatical errors in children's speech are usually recognized as the main evidence of language delay or language disorder. These errors are usually treated as a sign of a deficit in language competence. On the other hand, some studies have revealed the same kinds of grammatical errors in children with developmental language disorder (DLD) and in typically developed (TD) children. Quite often, DLD children use grammatical markers properly, but sometimes they do this erroneously. It has been suggested that the main area of the limitations in DLD children is language performance but not language competence. From the perspective of the resource deficit model, the error rate in DLD children should be influenced by the cognitive demands of utterance and text production. We presume that different genres of discourse demand a different number of cognitive resources and, thus, should differently impact the error rate in children's speech production. To test our hypothesis, we carried out an error analysis of two corpora of child discourse. The first corpus contained longitudinal data of discourse (personal narratives, fictional stories, chats, and discussions) collected from 12 children at four age points (4 years 3 months., 4 years 8 months., 5 years 3 months., and 5 years 9 months. years). Another corpus contained discourse texts (fictional stories and discussions) collected in the framework of a cross-sectional study from 6-year-old TD and DLD children; the DLD children had language expression but not comprehension difficulties. A comparative analysis between different discourse genres evidenced that the genre of discourse and age of assessment impacted the error distribution in the DLD and TD children. Such variables as the lexical and morphological error rates were impacted the most significantly. The results of the two studies confirmed our hypothesis regarding the probabilistic nature of lexical and grammatical errors in both DLD and TD children and the relationship between a cognitive loading of the genre and the error rate.

Keywords: derivational errors; developmental language disorder; grammatical errors; language errors; lexical errors; preschool age

References

  1. J Child Lang. 1983 Jun;10(2):401-14 - PubMed
  2. Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Aug;55:301-11 - PubMed
  3. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Apr;48(2):405-25 - PubMed
  4. Cogn Sci. 2015 Aug;39(6):1396-418 - PubMed
  5. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000 Jan-Mar;35(1):83-93 - PubMed
  6. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):53-9 - PubMed
  7. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2007 Nov-Dec;42(6):665-81 - PubMed
  8. Dev Neuropsychol. 2004;26(2):571-93 - PubMed
  9. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Feb 1;60(2):379-392 - PubMed
  10. Autism Res. 2014 Dec;7(6):720-30 - PubMed
  11. Pediatr Rehabil. 2001 Jul-Sep;4(3):119-36 - PubMed
  12. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1994 Aug;86(2-3):227-72 - PubMed
  13. J Child Lang. 2008 Nov;35(4):735-71 - PubMed
  14. Clin Linguist Phon. 2010 Aug;24(8):622-45 - PubMed
  15. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;53(1):37-45 - PubMed
  16. Cortex. 2005 Jun;41(3):399-433 - PubMed
  17. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Oct 1;2(10):389-98 - PubMed
  18. Dev Sci. 2014 May;17(3):352-65 - PubMed
  19. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1998 Jul 1;29(3):132-147 - PubMed
  20. J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Oct;35(5):1064-75 - PubMed
  21. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 09;369(1634):20120403 - PubMed
  22. Child Dev. 1993 Aug;64(4):960-81 - PubMed
  23. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 May;17(2):194-206 - PubMed
  24. J Neurophysiol. 1999 Jul;82(1):255-9 - PubMed
  25. Psychol Rev. 1986 Jul;93(3):283-321 - PubMed
  26. J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Oct;36(5):868-82 - PubMed
  27. Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):737-51 - PubMed
  28. Am J Psychol. 2002 Fall;115(3):415-50 - PubMed
  29. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Dec;41(6):1363-74 - PubMed
  30. Infant Behav Dev. 2015 May;39:42-52 - PubMed
  31. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0158753 - PubMed
  32. J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Jun;33(2):220-8 - PubMed
  33. Child Neuropsychol. 2013 Sep;19(5):516-39 - PubMed
  34. Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;33(1):75-103 - PubMed
  35. Lang Speech. 1990 Jan-Mar;33 ( Pt 1):19-29 - PubMed
  36. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Jul 5;49(3):424-433 - PubMed
  37. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Oct 25;62(10):3808-3825 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support